As RedState reported, President Donald Trump has lifted his moratorium on attending the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner. Saturday will mark his first-ever attendance at what has been dubbed "the nerd prom," with journalists glad-handing and congratulating one another for being their not-so-fabulous selves. Think, the Academy Awards, with less attractive people.
Weijia Jiang, President of the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA), said on X, "We're happy the president has accepted our invitation and look forward to hosting him." Trump graciously agreed to attend in light of this year marking the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, and First Lady Melania Trump will be coming along with him.
But for certain journalists, this is all too cozy and Kum-bah-yah. They don't want President Trump to come to the dinner and have a good time. They want their fellow D.C. journalists to rise up to "force protest!" What does that mean? Will the journos break out into chants of "This is what democracy looks like?!" or sing, "Which side are you on?" Or will they do a synchronized dance in their tuxes and come-jump-me heels?
According to the letter being shared by all the left-wing hacks, a group of 250 journalists signed a letter demanding the WHCA bow to their wishes. The signatories include Sam Donaldson (who?), Dan Rather (he's still alive?!), and Jackie Judd (huh?), among others.
The letter reads, in part:
To the Officers, Board of Directors, and Members of the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA):
We, the undersigned, call upon the White House Correspondents' Association to use the occasion of the White House Correspondents' Dinner, to forcefully demonstrate opposition to President Trump's efforts to trample freedom of the press.
The dinner has long served as a symbol of the vital and irreplaceable role of a free press in American democracy and a celebration of the First Amendment and the journalists who uphold it. President Trump's systematic, sustained, and unprecedented attacks on the free press (detailed below) render his presence at such an event a profound contradiction of its purpose.
The collective weight of the administration's actions — retaliatory access bands, coercive regulatory investigations, frivolous lawsuits against the press, defunding of public broadcasting, dismantling of international broadcasting, physical restrictions on journalists, personal verbal attacks on reporters, assaults on the media in official White House press releases and social media posts, the arrests of journalists, and the pardoning of those who committed violence against the press — represent the most systematic and comprehensive assault on freedom of the press by a sitting American president.
Read More: Trump Broke Them: The President Will Attend His First White House Correspondents' Dinner
Already Terrible WHCA Appoints a New Head, and Somehow Manages to Get Comically Worse
So, President Joe Biden called lids at 11 a.m., rescinded press access to 440 media outlets, and limited press to selected outlets and pre-programmed questions. But President Donald Trump holds press scrums on the tarmac of Joint Base Andrews on the regular, and answers questions unscripted and off-the-cuff, wherever he goes. Trump also responds to journalists' calls to his cell phone at all hours.
NEWS: President Trump just told me over the phone that he disagrees with Energy Secretary Chris Wright's assessment that gas prices may not drop until next year.
— Julia Manchester (@JuliaManch) April 20, 2026
“No, I think he’s wrong on that. Totally wrong," Trump said.
So, who, exactly, is a threat to the First Amendment?
Take all the seats, whiners.
There is a long tradition of presidents attending the White House Correspondents Association Dinner. But these are not normal times, and this cannot be business as usual with the press standing up to applaud the man who attacks them on a daily basis.
We understand that some journalists plan to wear pocket handkerchiefs or lapel pins with the words the First Amendment. And continuing in that spirit, we believe the White House Correspondents Association should take stronger action by issuing — from the podium — a forceful defense of freedom of the press and condemnation of those who threaten that freedom, followed by a standing toast to the First Amendment and a pledge to continue upholding such a critical cornerstone of our democracy. Speak forcefully, in front of the man who seeks to undermine our country's long tradition of an independent, strong, and free press.
Yeah, this is gonna be brutal. Trump takes down these folks' gotcha questions and poorly framed logic with precision. Trust me, whatever they have planned, he'll be loaded for bear.
We also urge the WHCA to reaffirm, without equivocation, that freedom of the press is not a partisan issue and that the Association will not normalize this behavior but instead fight back against any officeholder who has waged systemic war against the journalists whose work the dinner celebrates.
The letter ends with a two-and-a-half-page laundry list of "Trump Administration's Attack on the Free Press," along with the 250 signatories listed alphabetically.
Here is where these fauxnalists tank their entire argument. This screed is nothing BUT partisan. Where were their protests when President Barack Obama spied on then-Fox News correspondent James Rosen and then-CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson? Non-existent. They gladly toasted and took photos with the "first Black President" because he represented their values and the correct political leanings.
The fact that the people who signed on to this letter, and those who will attend the dinner, are still publishing under their bylines or trotting on to whatever news outlet finds them interesting to spout about how terrible Trump is, is proof that the First Amendment is alive and well, and their protests are merely performative theater. The legacy media loses credibility by the day, especially when they cannot even distinguish NAFTA from NATO.
New York Times mocked for bungling meaning of NATO: 'How embarrassing and sad' https://t.co/nuU4EulUVW pic.twitter.com/UkNfVkTc7Q
— New York Post (@nypost) April 3, 2026
There is real suppression of the First Amendment happening, though: look no further than California and the so-called "Stop Nick Shirley" Act that is designed to suppress independent journalism and free speech. That same Nick Shirley has done the work of helping to expose corruption and further the First Amendment, yet he has to hire personal security because he's getting death threats. This bunch thinks they're being targeted if their Starbucks order is wrong.
This dinner is the most vain-glorious event ever put on in DC - and that’s saying a lot.
I don’t know why any Republican would go. The press will toast itself, brag about how they are saving the republic, and only Democrats will agree.
The biggest threat to the press is the press. They’re the ones who lost their customers trust long ago.
This dinner is the most vain-glorious event ever put on in DC - and that’s saying a lot.
— Ari Fleischer (@AriFleischer) April 20, 2026
I don’t know why any Republican would go. The press will toast itself, brag about how they are saving the republic, and only Democrats will agree.
The biggest threat to the press is the… https://t.co/46UG4VfMm9
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member