The Gift That Keeps on Giving: DSA Co-Chair's Remarks on Taxing Americans Do Not Go Well

AP Photo/Jon Cherry

As we reported, Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) national co-chair Megan Romer dropped a stunning admission, when she appeared on Fox News and confirmed a list of the unhinged things that her organization supports. 

Advertisement

Then, she also made a telling confession that she hadn't been contacted by any Democrats asking her to tone down what she is saying. That says a lot. Instead, the Democrat leaders are saying "big tent," and not calling them out. 


READ MORE: DSA Co-Chair Confirms Its Extreme Agenda in Stunning Admission on Live TV

DSA Co-Chair Admits: Not One Dem Has Asked Her to Tone Down Calls to Abolish Senate, Presidency


But apparently Romer still wants to be the gift that keeps on giving, opening eyes into how awful socialism is. She went into the typical diatribe against millionaires during an interview on The New Yorker Radio Hour with David Remnick. 

Among the things she said was that the DSA believes in "taxing the hell out of millionaires." In perhaps an unusual move for a liberal media outlet, Remnick then asked what exactly that meant. Her surprised face at about seven seconds in shows she didn't expect it. It doesn't go well. 

Advertisement

Romer replied, "Yeah. You know, again, I don't have, like, a solid…" 

Remnick pressed, "But shouldn't you?" 

Romer stammered, "Umm, that's a good question." Yeah, so why can't you answer it? It's almost as though it's an empty slogan that you haven't ever been really asked to justify before.

Remnick kept at it, "If you're the co-chair of the DSA, shouldn't you be more specific than just taxing the hell out of something? What exactly do you mean?"

Then Romer delivered up a word salad worthy of Kamala Harris, as Remnick looks on quizzically, trying to understand. 

'So it's democracy, right? We have to look at what we have to spend, and what we need. We don't want to depend on the existence of millionaires, because that means people are still getting exploited. So yeah, we need to look at what we need to pay for in the interim, what sort of tax base we need for that to happen, and build from there." 

That sounds like she wants to tax people based on how much they want to spend. Yikes. Can you imagine how much that would be, based on all the things that the DSA wants to take over? And unless that's voted on by the individual voter, no, that isn't "democracy." Plus, we're not a pure democracy; we're a constitutional republic. 

Apparently the very existence of millionaires means people are being exploited. So I have a few questions. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is a socialist, worth a couple of million dollars, according to reports. Does that mean people are exploited because he's a millionaire? So, maybe he should be redistributing one of his three homes to us, right? 

Advertisement

But this is how shallow and economically silly such comments are. The Republicans need to put these things in ads and point them right at the Democrats, who have encouraged this, and warn of what might be coming if Democrats manage to take back power. 

People had thoughts. 

Editor’s Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical Left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its successes. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos