Premium

Mamdani Explains in Explosive 2020 Video How He Fooled White Liberals

Anna Connors/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Zohran Mamdani didn’t just say the "quiet part out loud." He shouted it with a bullhorn.

Mamdani’s explanation of the Democrat Party’s bait-and-switch of identity politics to communism is useful because it shows how radicals prey on various types of tribalism.

There may be no stronger tribalism than that of woke white women. It’s just that they are bound together by their support of the “other” rather than their support of Americans.

Mamdani's revelation came from a June 2020 TASCTV segment that was recently uncovered by End Wokeness.

The New York City mayor knows exactly how to tell different constituents in the Democrat Party exactly what they want to hear.

Here is what he revealed about foreign-born Democrats' manipulation of white liberals using identity politics and ideological warfare.

“I think that minority communities, because we have never had representation, we are tied much more to identity. White communities—they’ve had representation forever—and so for them their tie is a little less identity and a little more ideology. 

And so what I mean by that is we have a lot of voters here who think of themselves first as progressive voters, and so we reach out to them speaking about our platform, our progressive platform. And you’re very right that you need someone in the middle to be a validator, someone to tell them to trust us, believe in us. We’ve had that with Tiffany Cabán and Cynthia Nixon…”

There you have it. Much like you see with Muslim-majority countries around the world, they have adopted the language of socialism in order to draw international support for Islamist agendas and to raise money from white liberal donors.

But this Red-Green alliance will not result in any Christmas presents. That’s because Muslim extremists are simply telling liberals what they want to hear, meanwhile backing policies that are fundamentally illiberal, discriminatory, and undemocratic.

In Michigan, Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed has backed radical policies that would make many Americans’ heads spin. He has defended sharia law against a ban in the state of Oklahoma and told an audience straight up, “You may not hate Muslims, but Muslims for sure hate you.”

Then there is the issue of Hasan Piker, an Islamo-communist Twitch streamer who casually spouts violent rhetoric, calls for ethnic cleansing of white people, and on one podcast, he supported the goal of Mamdani’s housing adviser Cea Weaver to “impoverish the white middle class.” Piker is also a fan of El-Sayed.


READ MORE: El-Sayed to Americans in 2018 Video: 'You May Not Hate Muslims, but Muslims for Sure Hate You'


Only “useful idiots” would support their own destruction. Why wouldn’t socialists want to raise up the lower class, instead of seeking to impoverish the middle class?

Because their goal is to destabilize America and to ultimately destroy it. Saul Alinsky also despised the middle class. As he said in an interview with Playboy:

“With rare exceptions, our activists and radicals are products of and rebels against our middle-class society. … Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for change, and the power and the people are in the big middle-class majority.”

Although he had disgust for the white middle class, Alinsky repeatedly stressed the practical necessity of organizing it rather than writing it off, because even a fully organized coalition of the poor would still be a minority. He described middle-class discontent as useful “organizational material” and urged rubbing raw the “sores of discontent.”

Islamo-communists like Mamdani and El-Sayed may seem to be coming out of the woodwork, but their paths were already cleared by stealth radicals who came before them.

Thus, we shouldn’t be surprised that “mainstream” Democrats, from Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to California Gov. Gavin Newsom to former President Barack Obama, are lining up to support El-Sayed.

Democratic bigwigs are rushing to embrace Michigan Senate hopeful Dr. Abdul El-Sayed and present a united front, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom expected to visit him Monday and former President Barack Obama giving him a call.

The Dem powerbrokers are seemingly trying to soothe moderates in the Wolverine State who might have found El-Sayed too extreme during the bruising Senate primary and encourage them to back the progressive in November.

Newsom, a long-speculated 2028 aspirant, hailed El-Sayed as a “fighter” and called for Dems to unite due to the “existential” moment the country faces.

It’s not like these political heavyweights are suddenly intrigued with communists running in the Democrat Party. There have been communists in the Democrat Party for decades; they were just better at hiding it.

Now, Democrat voters are on the verge of plunging more states and cities into socialism, because white women think it would be "bigoted" to vote against foreign-born radicals, even if they are Muslim extremists whose support for sharia entails subjugation under the "patriarchy," intolerance of minorities, and undemocratic governance.

There is a term for that: It’s called “suicidal empathy.”

Recommended

Trending on RedState Videos