Groypers. The movement built around Nick Fuentes with a more rigid interpretation of “America First.”
Everyone has an opinion about them. Almost no one is asking an important question.
Why does it exist?
In Florida, a gubernatorial Republican candidate has drawn significant attention from online “America First” circles that overlap with the Groyper ecosystem. In California, a Republican candidate for State Treasurer openly positions himself against the party structure and echoes a similar anti-establishment posture. In Los Angeles County, a Republican candidate became enough of a concern in a congressional race that party leaders moved to counter him directly over perceived ties to that same ecosystem.
Related: Choose Better Heroes: The Democrats Keep Struggling Now That They Own Hasan Piker
None of these candidates are dominating their races. None represent the core of the Republican electorate. And yet they are resonating with a segment of conservatives.
By’rone wants to turn Florida into a Section 8 ghetto https://t.co/y0bjhWNxvN
— James Fishback (@j_fishback) January 11, 2026
We had soapbox speeches and I listened to the people while donors paid $225 to listen to Ted Cruz. Then the people asked me to speak.
— David Serpa (@Serpa4Treasurer) April 13, 2026
Most people can’t afford a $200 convention, $225 to see Ted Cruz, gas, food, and hotels in San Diego, but the party doesn’t care about people.… pic.twitter.com/fz9rdoC35f
We had soapbox speeches and I listened to the people while donors paid $225 to listen to Ted Cruz. Then the people asked me to speak.
Most people can’t afford a $200 convention, $225 to see Ted Cruz, gas, food, and hotels in San Diego, but the party doesn’t care about people.
They care about money.
OnlyFans Republicans.
Red Light Whores.
Political Prostitutes.
Judas, but without the guilt afterward.
The very system we organize against is how we cast our votes in the Republican Party.
Failure is in the design of the system.
Proxies: Voting on behalf of voters who are not present.
Electronic voting: What most Republicans are against.
Leadership influencing votes:
Telling people how the Chair suggests voting,
Or how the committee suggests voting, during a vote from a microphone.
Let’s make it clear:
They weren’t just against ME.
They are against US.
I’m not a billionaire.
I’m not rich.
I’m a combat veteran.
A dad with 5 kids.
I want to make a difference.
I no longer want peace.
There will be no political quarter.
We are only interested in ending careers.
Do not waive a white flag when you see us.
We came for peace to Convention.
We wanted to give you the option.
You chose a war you are ill equipped to wage.
I will never pull another punch.
The Republican Party is no different than the Democratic Party.
Tell me I’m wrong.
Two wings. One bird.
One big club.
You ain’t in it.
When I saw the rhetoric around convention, it was clear I had to do what is necessary to keep the door open for the next generation of Republicans.
It was no longer about winning.
It was about freedom of speech.
This convention was not a loss, however.
We won BIG! We killed a Resolution against America First.
We converted Boomers to America First.
We won hearts and minds for America First.
Everyone is tired of endless war.
Everyone is tired of being poor.
Everyone is tired of corruption.
Everyone wants prosecutions.
We are tired of struggling in the richest state, in the richest country on earth.
A land our forefathers imagined.
A land our great-grandparents built.
A land lost by our parents.
A Republic left to us to restore.
We have so little left to give but we will give all of it.
You can’t take anything from a generation that was never given anything in the first place.
You showed us who you are…
Now, it’s about total victory.
We will remember every name, every slight, every baseless accusation, every whispered word.
The Republican Party deserves exactly what happens next.
Remember, it was your choice.
I’m ready to die for it.
I know where I’m going.
Are you ready to die for it?
Do you know how you fight when your back is against the wall? I do.
“But whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” America Only
California First
Christ is King
Legacy media outlets frame this as evidence of extremism inside the GOP. The conclusion is that it must be confronted and contained. On the other side, many conservatives dismiss it as overhyped, arguing these candidates are marginal and not representative of the broader party. Even within Republican circles, some describe figures associated with the movement as little more than online agitators with limited real influence.
Both perspectives focus on classification. Neither explains what is driving it.
Because movements do not grow based on what they are called. They grow based on what they provide. To understand that, you have to go back to where this started.
Before it showed up in campaigns, it showed up in culture.
This did not begin as a traditional political operation. It began online. The “Groyper” meme was circulating as early as 2015 and gained broader traction by 2017 as a more niche and intentionally provocative offshoot of the broader Pepe the Frog meme culture. In those spaces, it was less a joke than a signal, helping to establish a shared identity within certain corners of the internet.
In 2018, Massachusetts congressional candidate Shiva Ayyadurai incorporated Groyper-style imagery into campaign materials, signaling to a niche online audience that most of the political world was not yet paying attention to. At the time, it looked like fringe behavior. In hindsight, it looks more like an early indicator of how internet subcultures would begin translating into political signaling.
What began as commentary started surfacing in real political spaces. Not just talking about politics, but participating in it. Not just criticizing institutions, but attempting to enter them.
That transition is what changed the dynamic. It is also what has triggered concern inside the party.
An internal memo from the California Republican Party in February warned of a movement described as a radical and divisive iteration of “America First” ideology emerging within its ranks. It also highlighted the movement’s strategy to build influence from within: run candidates in primaries, secure delegate and committee roles, and expand over time.
The American experiment requires a moral compass. When antisemitism and other forms of hate goes unchallenged, our silence becomes a license for prejudice. As leaders, we don't just 'oppose' hate, we drown it out. Because on this issue, silence is consent, and we will not be… https://t.co/AX7v5KUsGO
— John Park (@cagopvicechair) March 18, 2026
At the same time, not everyone on the right agrees with that assessment. Some argue this is still largely an online phenomenon with little connection to actual Republican voters. And there is truth in that.
Read More: Trump Fires Back at Megyn Kelly After She Claims US Troops Died for Iran or Israel
But small groups do not need to be dominant to matter. They only need to be persistent, organized, and able to reach the next group of participants entering the system. That is where this movement has found traction, with younger voters.
A lot of younger conservatives are entering politics in an environment where institutions feel distant and outcomes feel disconnected from participation. They are not being drawn in by policy papers or traditional messaging. They are being drawn in by clarity, identity, and the sense that someone is willing to explain how the system actually works.
You do not have to agree with that explanation to understand why it resonates.
One of the more overlooked aspects of this movement is that it does not always fit neatly into the categories used to describe it. Recent reporting has highlighted the presence of nonwhite participants and defenders within the same ecosystem, even as it is widely labeled in racial terms.
That contradiction should not be ignored.
It suggests the appeal is not as simple as critics assume. It is not just about ideology. It is about something broader. It is giving young people something they feel they are missing.
That is why labeling Groypers as fringe does not stop them. In some cases, it reinforces the movement. It strengthens the outsider identity that drives engagement in the first place.
Some on the right have been sounding the alarm. They argue that failing to confront these ideas risks allowing them to reshape the Republican Party itself. And that warning should be taken seriously.
Please read this important column, and share it.
— Jon Fleischman (@FlashReport) April 14, 2026
The Right Must Confront Antisemitism Or Be Defined By It
A dangerous strain of antisemitism is emerging inside the Republican coalition, and failing to confront it now will redefine the movement into something unrecognizable,… pic.twitter.com/glba3W9hwX
Please read this important column, and share it.
The Right Must Confront Antisemitism Or Be Defined By It
A dangerous strain of antisemitism is emerging inside the Republican coalition, and failing to confront it now will redefine the movement into something unrecognizable, and terrible.
Link in first comment below…
But confronting something effectively requires understanding why it is happening in the first place. Without that, the response will always lag behind the problem.
The divide has now reached the top. President Donald Trump has begun openly criticizing figures and networks associated with this space, signaling that he sees it as a threat to the coalition he built under the “America First” banner. (You can see the full Truth Social post here.)
𝗗𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗱 𝗝. 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗲 𝟬𝟰:𝟮𝟴 𝗣𝗠 𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝟬𝟰.𝟬𝟵.𝟮𝟲𝟳
— Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) April 9, 2026
I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for…
I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the Number One State Sponsor of Terror, to have a Nuclear Weapon — Because they have one thing in common, Low IQs. They’re stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too! Look at their past, look at their record. They don’t have what it takes, and they never did! They’ve all been thrown off Television, lost their Shows, and aren’t even invited on TV because nobody cares about them, they’re NUT JOBS, TROUBLEMAKERS, and will say anything necessary for some “free” and cheap publicity. Now they think they get some “clicks” because they have Third Rate Podcasts, but nobody’s talking about them, and their views are the opposite of MAGA — Or I wouldn’t have won the Presidential Election in a LANDSLIDE. MAGA agrees with me, and just gave CNN a 100% Approval Rating of “TRUMP,” not Hand Flailing Fools like Tucker Carlson, who couldn’t even finish College, he was a broken man when he got fired from Fox, and he’s never been the same — Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist! Or Megyn Kelly, who nastily asked me the now famous, “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” question, or “Crazy” Candace Owens, who accuses the Highly Respected First Lady of France of being a man, when she is not, and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me, the First Lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace, in fact, it’s not even close! Or Bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things, and lost his entire fortune, as he should have, for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming it was a hoax. These so-called “pundits” are LOSERS, and they always will be! Now Fake News CNN, The Failing New York Times, and all of the other Radical Left “News” Organizations, are “hailing” them, and giving them “positive” press for the first time in their lives. They’re not “MAGA,” they’re losers, just trying to latch on to MAGA. As President, I could get them on my side anytime I want to, but when they call, I don’t return their calls because I’m too busy on World and Country Affairs and, after a few times, they go “nasty,” just like Marjorie “Traitor” Brown, but I no longer care about that stuff, I only care about doing right for our Country. MAGA is about WINNING and STRENGTH in not allowing Iran to have Nuclear Weapons. MAGA is about MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and these people have no idea how to do that, BUT I DO, because THE UNITED STATES IS NOW THE “HOTTEST” COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! President DONALD J. TRUMP
That shift raises the stakes. But it does not answer why this movement is happening.
Calling something toxic does not explain why it attracts attention. Calling it fringe does not explain why it is now surfacing in real races. And ignoring it does not make it go away.
The Groyper movement is not the Republican Party nor is it the dominant force in the GOP.
But it is not nothing.
It is something that has moved from the edges into the conversation, from online spaces into actual campaigns, and from commentary into participation. And when something is consistently dismissed, actively opposed, and still manages to grow, the issue is not just what is it.
The issue is, what is it responding to? And what gap is it filling?
If you want to confront this movement, you first have to understand why it exists. Right now, most people don’t. And that is why it keeps growing.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member