‘Beyond the Pale’: Mike Johnson Defends Trump, Torches Dems Who Called for Military to Defy Orders

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

You just knew the moment President Trump posted remarks about a handful of Democrats engaging in sedition and treason on social media, along with the accompanying punishment for such acts, that the press was going to jump all over him for it.

Advertisement

Not the possibility that Democrats were actually engaging in seditious acts.

Shifting the focus is what the media does. It's why they might as well end the charade and admit they're on the payroll of the DNC. Their response has been no surprise.

Perhaps surprisingly, however, House Speaker Mike Johnson defended the President's remarks to a degree, noting that he's simply defining the terms while the Democrats have engaged in "wildly inappropriate" behavior.

As a brief reminder, RedState's Bob Hoge covered a video in which a group of Democrat lawmakers urged military troops and intelligence officials to defy orders from their superiors that they deem illegal. 


READ MORE: Dem Lawmakers Urge Military, Intelligence Personnel to Defy Authority in Not-at-All Subtle Video

Karoline Leavitt Drops Mic on Dems Calling on Troops to Defy Orders


Their phrasing in the video is very deliberate. They make no mention of President Trump, but they surely reference "this administration." 

They do not spell out which orders they are referencing, but make mention of those which are "pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens." Not subtle by any measure. They are calling for service members sent to enforce immigration laws and clean up crime in blue cities to defy their orders.

Advertisement

They are likely also referencing orders to incinerate narco-terrorists and their drug-running boats, defensive maneuvers to protect Americans as ordered by the President and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

The defense Democrats have mounted is that they explicitly refer to "illegal orders." The problem is, they're encouraging service members to personally interpret the orders as illegal. There is a vast difference between manifestly or patently illegal orders and those whose illegality is debatable, contested, or requires legal interpretation. The latter of which, refusing to obey an order one feels personally questionable, is itself illegal.

As they were not subtle, Trump, who is rarely shy about expressing his feelings, fired back on Truth Social. He referred to the actions of those involved—Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ),  Reps. Chris Deluzio (PA-17), Chrissy Houlahan (PA-6), Maggie Goodlander (NH-2), and Jason Crow (CO-6)—as "seditious behavior punishable by death."

Sensing an opening to create a rift, reporters sought Johnson's thoughts on the matter. He didn't waver, noting that the calls for sedition are the real problem here, not somebody who points it out when they see it.

 "What I read was he was defining the crime of sedition," Johnson said. "That is a factual statement. But obviously, attorneys have to parse the language and determine all that."

Advertisement

He handled it well. The Speaker then tore into the Democrats for their behavior, saying it was a "wildly inappropriate thing for so-called leaders in Congress to do to encourage young troops to disobey orders."

Johnson wasn't finished.

“For a senator like Mark Kelly or any member of the House or Senate to behave in that kind of talk is to me so just beyond the pale,” he said before concluding, “I’m not going to say anything more on it.”

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday made similar remarks, absolutely torching the media for keeping their eyes on Trump even as Democrats actively call for the military to rise up and defy him.

Advertisement

"Why aren't you talking about what these members of Congress are doing to encourage and incite violence?" Leavitt demanded to know.

"They're suggesting, Nancy, that the president has given illegal orders, which he has not," she added. "Every single order that is given to the U.S. military by this Commander in Chief and through this chain of command, through the Secretary of War, is lawful, and the courts have proven that."

Why aren't they talking about it? They're Trump obsession forbids them from doing so. And they, without a doubt, would love to see members of the military rise up and defy the Commander-in-Chief's orders.

  • Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos