Texas Senate Candidate James Talarico denies that we need stronger election integrity laws.
As a Texas state legislator, he opposed election security measures, such as a ban on drive-through voting and unsolicited mailing of ballot applications.
He even stood against S.B. 1, a bill that required voters to provide documentation of their right to vote, such as a driver’s license, an election identification certificate, or the last four digits of a Social Security number.
Whether or not you agree these standards are sufficient to prevent illegal voting, Talarico wouldn’t even go along with these modest safeguards.
Then he railed against the Lone Star State for taking a stand against illegal voting.
"I will say that we already have a lot of voter suppression in Texas. It’s baked into our laws. I’ve fought fiercely against many of those laws when they were coming through the legislature," Talarico said.
"Texas is one of the hardest places to vote in the country as a result. It’s why we see such low voter turnout in our state compared to other states," Talarico said.
These are the shopworn rejoinders that Americans can expect Democrats to make anytime a law is proposed to strengthen our election system.
“It makes it harder for people to vote.”
Illegally. They forget that word every time, as is the case with the immigration debate.
Broadly speaking, conservatives aren’t against voting; they are against illegal voting. Conservatives aren’t against immigration; they are against illegal immigration.
We may have just figured out another reason that James Talarico isn’t concerned about stopping illegal voting. He may now have some explaining to do on that score himself.
That is because it is generally illegal in Texas to register to vote or to vote using an address where you do not actually reside (including a parent’s home if you do not live there), particularly if done to vote in a specific district.
Residence is defined by domicile — your home and fixed place of habitation to which you intend to return after any temporary absence — not merely a mailing address or family property you do not inhabit.
“Except as otherwise provided by this code, a person may vote only in the election precinct in which the person resides,” Texas law states.
READ MORE: Brandon Gill Has a Genius Plan to End the 'Foreign Invasion' of Birth Tourism
What do we have here? This report from The Federalist includes evidence suggesting multiple possible election-law violations on Talarico's part:
Woke warrior James Talarico sounds like your classic mama’s boy. The 37-year-old Texas Senate candidate reportedly shares an individual checking account with his mother, a frequent contributor to his campaigns.
And records obtained by The Federalist show the Democratic Party’s great white hope for blueing up deep red Texas used his mother’s Austin address to register to vote in order to launch a previous campaign — an apparent violation of Texas election law.
It’s an interesting twist in the key Senate race, given that Talarico has accused his opponent, Republican state Attorney General Ken Paxton, of illegally voting in elections from the “wrong address.”
So, it’s even worse that he may have broken the law by allegedly registering to vote unlawfully.
If you’re wondering if Talarico actually voted, as I did, then here he is boasting about it in November 2022:
I voted for fully-funded schools.
— James Talarico (@jamestalarico) November 1, 2022
I voted for universal health care.
I voted for legal marijuana.
I voted for sane gun laws.
I voted for clean air and water.
I voted for safe, legal abortions.
I voted for good jobs with a living wage.
I voted for @BetoORourke. pic.twitter.com/gilQkljTvq
But did Talarico vote illegally?
The details of the Talarico case are mildly amusing, because they rest on the 37-year-old getting a lifeline from his mommy:
In early December 2021 (eight days before the candidate filing deadline), the Democrat registered to vote at his mother’s home address in Austin, according to Texas voter registration files. There’s no evidence, sources say, that Talarico lived at his mother’s home during the period. Even if he did, the candidate would have to have resided there for at least a year before launching his House campaign.
The Texas Constitution is clear: Candidates running for Texas House seats must have resided in the state for two years prior to the election, and at least one year in the districts they’re running to represent.
In 2022, after running in the party primary and listing his mother’s address on his election forms, Talarico purchased a home at 1402 Manford Hill Drive in Austin — in the 50th House District. The three-bedroom property, built in 1972, boasts an assessed value of $407,500, according to Zillow.com.
Talarico’s campaign did not return The Federalist’s request for comment.
Now, it appears to be worse than it looks. That’s because Talarico used that same residence, the one belonging to his mother, to launch his Texas House race.
That was after he was “gerrymandered” out of the 52nd district.
So, you can add to Talarico's potential legal violations questions about whether his Texas House candidacy also complied with the state's residency requirements.
As if there weren’t enough pretzel turns in this story, Talarico has accused his rival Senate candidate Ken Paxton of illegally voting in elections, as The Federalist notes.
But the would-be preacher who in 2021 described himself as “a Christian who hates Christianity” while pandering to “a “nonbinary, transgender, Latinx theologian on the autistic spectrum,” had plenty to say about Paxton after a hit piece accused Paxton of using “an address where he did not live while voting in six elections in the past two years, including in May’s runoff that made him the Republican nominee for U.S. senator.”
It didn’t take long for the Texas attorney general to seize on the news:
James Talarico has proven he has zero regard for Texans and the rule of law.
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) July 28, 2026
He's been lying to voters and shamelessly committing election fraud to hold onto power. https://t.co/JffI4F2IHn
“James Talarico has proven he has zero regard for Texans and the rule of law,” Paxton wrote on X.
“He's been lying to voters and shamelessly committing election fraud to hold onto power.”
A bold statement. The gauntlet’s been thrown.
Now, we’ll have to see if the soy boy comes back at Paxton to slap him with a glove.
In the meantime, it looks like Talarico may be in a bit of legal trouble.
Editor’s Note: We voted for mass deportations, not mass amnesty. Help us continue to fight back against those trying to go against the will of the American people.
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.







Join the conversation as a VIP Member