I've taken a severe dislike to the Ms. Rachel brand. The more Rachel Accurso and her troupe appear in the news, the more I'm convinced there is something very sinister going on in the heart of America's most popular children's entertainer.
I definitely don't mean to sound hyperbolic, because I don't think I'm being that at all when I say that Ms. Rachel is seriously bad for your kids and this country.
I've been writing about her for some time. At first, I came at her like she was a reasonable person, trying to explain why half the country was so wary of someone introducing people who come from the LGBT community on her show, giving her the benefit of the doubt that her New York surroundings blinded her to the reality of the rest of the country. However, it was soon proven that she was far more deliberate than she initially let on.
It was pretty clear she had a political agenda and was going to use children around the world to achieve it. After a few incidents involving trying to invite Dylan Mulvaney onto her channel to star in a video, and consistently pouring out her heart to the children of Gaza to the Western world while completely ignoring the Israeli children killed by Hamas, I'd had enough.
Read: It's Time for Parents to Ditch Ms. Rachel
It only got worse as she effectively became friends with New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and promoted universal childcare, a communist idea that has no business even being considered in the United States of America. The fact that she proceeded to try to convince Christians that the only way to be good Christians is to subscribe to the socialist idea of it only disgusted me more.
In my last article highlighting the danger that is Ms. Rachel, I covered how Accurso was crashing out after being caught liking antisemitic Instagram posts. She attempted to tell everyone it was an accident, but it was an accident that was pretty hard to accidentally do.
I came to the conclusion that Ms. Rachel is actually a political puppet and should be banned from anyone's home that has any love for the United States, or their children, for that matter.
Read: Ban Bad Kids Programs, Not Just to Protect Your Kids, but to Protect the Adults They'll Become
Fast-forward to this Monday, and if there was any doubt, this story should cure you of any hope you might have had for her.
As reported by NBC News, Accurso had a video call with Deiver Henao Jiminez, a nine-year-old boy who was held with his parents at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center in Texas. Dressed as Ms. Rachel, she can literally be seen starting by asking if he misses his friends and his school. The rest of it: the boy saying the food hurts his stomach, and that he just wants to get out to go to his spelling bee.
Anyone who's paid attention for long enough knows that this video was likely arranged to be as heartbreaking as possible. In fact, Accurso notes that she first became aware of the Dilley holding facility when Liam Conejo Ramos was abandoned by his father, who was trying to evade ICE, and both were sent there once he was captured. Accurso also commented on this moment as well, leaving out the detail that the child was left alone as the father attempted to escape ICE, and it was ICE agents who protected him until his father was retrieved.
According to Variety, Accurso is trying to get the facility closed down:
Accurso is now working with lawyers and immigration activists “to close Dilley and make sure that kids and their parents are back in their communities where they belong.”
In the article, she finishes out with one of the most insufferable things I've ever heard a child performer say:
“I am political,” Accurso told the news outlet. “It’s political to believe that children are worthy of love and care, and that every child is equal, and that our care shouldn’t stop at what we look like, our family, at our religion, at a border.”
Funny.
Where was she when the Bibas family, including the small children in Hamas's "care," were confirmed dead?
She gave no mention to them at all until people came down on her for neglecting to mention them, and even then, the statement she gave was a clear "afterthought" that reeked of "Fine, I'll say something."
If she's so concerned for children, then why isn't she pushing back against the child-trafficking and child-porn crimes being stopped thanks to ICE? Do they get no credit for taking these people off American streets? Does she not care about the children, both American and otherwise, who are kidnapped, bought and sold, and forced to do horrific things?
Funny how she seems to have no words for them, but she really wants you to pay attention to a certain kind of child... the child the left can use to make the right look bad.
If we lived in Ms. Rachel's world, then your child would not be safe. Not from illegal immigrants kidnapping them, not from LGBTQ+ activists trying to confuse them, not from Democrats trying to force themselves into your child's education, nothing. They would be in constant danger from an AWFL with a headband and an annoyingly high voice with an agenda that does not include your child's well-being.
Ms. Rachel should be banned from any home with a small child who is loved by their parents.
