Hail Mary? Teachers Union Claims Reopening Schools is Rooted in 'Sexism, Racism, and Misogyny'

(AP Photo/Jay Reeves)

 

In Chicago, they’ve got a choice: Reopen schools, or don’t be racist.

And also: Don’t be sexist.

Or misogynistic.

Apparently, the schools are getting a threefer if they move either way, and the city’s teachers union is quick to remind ’em.

As reported by The Daily Wire, a now-deleted tweet by the Chicago Teachers Union asserted the push to swing open houses of learning’s doors was the absolute result of “sexism, racism, and misogyny.”

Not — it should be understood — a reasoned conclusion that everyone can get safely back to class.

Per TDW, the city’s November plan allows some public school parents to have their kids return as early as January 1st — special needs students considered “moderate” and “severe,” as well as prekindergarteners in particular.

And everyone has the choice to re-enter February 1st.

Moms and dads were told to make a choice by Monday.

And if Chi-Town’s infection-doubling rate slows, it’s full steam ahead.

But the teacher’s union thinks it stinks, and that puts everybody in a pickle.

Just ask the Wire:

[C]TU’s [president, Jesse Sharkey] has been adamantly opposed to allowing any teachers or students into school buildings, leaving the city scrambling to help thousands of low-income students who have little access to remote learning tools and whose parents may struggle to find child care and help with remote learning while they work.

So as Monday neared, the union allegedly brought out its biggest guns:

“The push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism and misogyny.”

The ol’ standbys.

The union filed an emergency motion on the 7th.

From the Chicago Sun-Times:

The Chicago Teachers Union is making its second legal attempt in as many months to put Chicago Public Schools’ reopening plans on hold, accusing the district of illegally refusing to negotiate health and safety conditions before ordering teachers back into classrooms.

CTU’s “seeking an injunction that would force the district to negotiate in good faith and reach agreements with the union on several issues before schools reopen, which the union says CPS has not done.”

So how could in-person courses negatively affect some races, but not others, or females, and not males?

President Jesse issued a statement dabbling in doubling down:

“CPS has stonewalled us for months as we’ve been trying to bargain enforceable safety standards for our district-run schools. We want our schools open as well, but we want it done safely, and not on the backs of the majority Black and Latinx students we serve.”

Reason Magazine begs to differ:

To say that sexism, racism, or any other -ism is at the “root” of the (thus far unsuccessful) reopening push is absurd and insulting. Stressed-out parents who want to send their kids back to the classroom are not motivated by animus toward teachers, and they are certainly not motivated by animus toward women or minorities. Indeed, many people who want schools to reopen are women and minorities. Pandemic-related closures have disproportionately affected inner-city families that rely on public education. Young kids of color are some of the hardest hit. More than 800,000 women have dropped out of the work force during the pandemic, in large part because they now have to take care of their kids.

Will the teachers union retreat their claims? Despite the deletion of the tweet, I’d says it’s unlikely.

Meanwhile, social media had some things to say:

One user recommended an alternate route:

Nonetheless, don’t be surprised if reopening schools is really about racism — according to seemingly constant headlines, it appears pretty much everything in America is.

-ALEX

 

Trey Gowdy is ‘Madder Than Hell’ at Nancy Pelosi for Her Partisan Pandemic Games

Doctor Who Told ‘Stop the Steal’ Ralliers to Remove Their Masks Has His License Revoked

Despite COVID-19, Toronto Keeps Open Safety Supply Stores – Like Sex Shops

Find all my RedState work here.

And please follow Alex Parker on Twitter and Facebook.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.