With Roe v. Wade in the Balance, the Left Is Changing Its Tune From 'What Are Women?' to 'We Are Protectors of Women'

(AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Americans, and especially women, are struggling and starving under Bidenflation. If my neighborhood feed is a barometer, mothers are crying for help as they experience the diminishing returns of high gas and food prices. The Democratic Left sees no problem using children for medical and social experiments without parental consent, and any mention of the uniqueness and exclusivity of the female gender is couched as “hatred” and an offense to the transgender agenda. Our newest Supreme Court Justice cannot even define what a woman is, because in her own words, “she’s not a biologist.”

Advertisement

But now that Roe v. Wade hangs in the balance, suddenly protecting “women” and their reproductive rights is at the forefront again.

Hypocrisy much?

Riddle me this: How can Congress protect a woman’s right to choose when they are incapable of defining what a woman is?

Bet the Democrats didn’t see that coming. Or maybe they did, and count on the women who vote being Pavlovian Dogs… or just stupid. That dog whistle of SCOTUS limiting their “reproductive rights” is ringing loud and clear again, and on cue, the Left is salivating. The fact that you are free to reproduce is why you are now making the choice to kill your unborn child, so that term in and of itself is an oxymoron.

But this hijacked language, making words mean something completely different than the true definition, is on brand for these folks. The sacrament is all—and it doesn’t matter that everything they’ve done up to this point has been laser-focused on destroying women, including the bloodlust of abortion.

Now that a SCOTUS draft opinion leaked that looks like Roe v. Wade may indeed be overturned, Democrats have pivoted, painting themselves as the only hope for women’s body autonomy. This leak of a SCOTUS opinion is shocking and unprecedented, and shows the length the Left will go to in order to maintain control.

Advertisement

RedState has documented this true scandal here, here, here, and here. As I wrote Monday evening, this is one of the reasons why some idiot leaked the draft opinion by Justices Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Coney-Barrett: to gin up the base. The deeply disturbed populace who think killing their pre-born babies is a manifest right, and “hands off my uterus!” are screeching on the Supreme Court steps as I write. My Body, My Choice was shot to hell for two years when these same Karens were demanding you mask up and vaxx up or lose your job and ability to interact and move freely in society.

Now, it’s back on the menu.

From my reading of history, Lincoln and Eisenhower were both pro-life. But Senate Majority Leader Schumer Schemer isn’t the brightest bulb in the box. He and Cruella Pelosi are poster children for the term, “useful idiot.” Emphasis on idiot.

Following the Speaker and the Majority Senator’s lead this Tuesday morning, Democrats are in full-court press, demanding everything from a national sanctuary law protecting abortion rights, to packing the Supreme Court. Female Congresspersons?… I don’t know, I’m not a biologist… are pontificating and protesting in State houses in California, Illinois, Oregon, New York, and other left-leaning states that claim to care about women. One idiot in Illinois had the nerve to include the term “birthing persons” in her speech.

Advertisement

Confused much?

And Dementia Joe’s handlers had to prop him up for a statement defending Roe and speaking out about the leaked draft opinion.

President Joe Biden on Tuesday said a woman’s right to have an abortion is “fundamental” in his first statement following a published draft of a Supreme Court opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade.

“I believe that a woman’s right to choose is fundamental,” Biden said in a statement. “Roe has been the law of the land for almost fifty years, and basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.”

Here he is babbling on about how all the basic mainstream religions have concluded that when human life exists is a question. Your deeply Catholic president, folks.

And “Basic fairness?” If unborn babies could speak, they would argue that it is grossly unfair to rip them from the womb. Don’t they have a right to live?

Advertisement

In his statement on Tuesday, Biden wrote that if the court does overturn Roe, “it will fall on our nation’s elected officials at all levels of government to protect a woman’s right to choose. And it will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November. At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.”

I’m old enough to remember when Dementia was rambling about transgender seniors. Whatever is (or is not) bouncing around his head, it certainly has nothing to do with a concern for women.

Just ask January Littlejohn, whose 13-year-old daughter was swept up into the transgender agenda without her consent:

A Florida mother has sued her daughter’s school after teachers launched a ‘transgender support plan’ without asking for parental consent, reports say.

January Littlejohn said her then 13-year-old daughter had a group of friends who were ‘obsessed’ with anything to do with the LGBTQ community.

She told how when three of them began identifying as trans or non-binary her daughter said she was confused about her own gender.

She said she and her husband brought their daughter to a councilor to help her work through her confusion and began doing research to understand the subject.

But weeks later Littlejohn revealed school bosses had spoken to the youngster about changing her name and which bathroom she wanted to use.

Advertisement

Or those female Penn swimmers, who the NCAA disenfranchised for the sake of “fairness” to the biological male, transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.

In response to the NCAA’s recently updated transgender policy, Lia Thomas’ teammates have spoken out against her.

Sixteen members of the University of Pennsylvania’s women’s swimming team, in a letter sent Thursday to school and Ivy League officials, asked that they not take legal action challenging the recent policy change. The updated NCAA policy has the power to remove Thomas, a transgender woman, from competing at next month’s NCAA championships.

Thomas competed for the Penn men’s team for three seasons before undergoing more than two years of hormone replacement therapy as part of her transition. She now competes on the Penn women’s swim team, and has dominated NCAA competition: She has posted the fastest times of any female college swimmer in two separate events this season.

Thomas’ dominance in the women’s field has sparked debate about competitive fairness within the Quakers’ team and throughout the sport.

Not a peep about support for women or “believe all women” from the Leftist base when it comes to maintaining safe spaces for women and girls. But the Democrats have always been selective about their supposed concern and care for women. Basically, if it’s going to fit their agenda, fill their coffers, and sway votes their way, it’s all tea and roses.

Advertisement

The law of unintended consequences: This calculated leak to foment outrage and influence a SCOTUS vote has exposed them, showing they have no leg to stand on.

Sponsored

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos