BBC Editing Scandal Rocks the Executive Suites - Top Officials Step Down, As Brian Stelter Excuses Them

Last week, some troubling — albeit unsurprising – revelations came out of the BBC realm. Reports showed that a film made a year ago at the British news outlet had completely contorted a speech that President Donald Trump gave on January 6, 2021. What has been surprising is that this has led to accountability, as a pair of BBC senior staffers resigned Sunday over this scandal.

Director-General Tim Davie and news chief Deborah Turness each tendered their resignations over the flap concerning a documentary the outlet put out last fall, which presented manipulated audio of Trump’s speech to make him appear as if he had commanded the crowd to conduct the riot on the Capitol that fateful day.

The BBC documentary “Trump: A Second Chance” was released just ahead of the general elections, a clear effort to influence the vote, and the egregious manner in which the network contorted Trump’s words exploded on the newscape last week. The attempt to paint him as culpable in the attacks that played out later that day was beyond blatant.

The BBC had cut together disparate portions of Trump’s speech, and masked the editing with a video cutaway as his words were played out. In it, they presented Trump urging people to back the Republicans in the Capitol, then their editing included an unrelated section of the speech as saying his supporters needed to “fight like hell”, making it appear he was provoking the violence that day.

Notably, the outlet chose to omit the portion where Trump urged peace: “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.” President Trump has sent a legal note to the network calling for a retraction and restitution.

The edited segment, though put out one year ago, gained notice when it was exposed fully by The Daily Telegraph that an internal review of the broadcast was made, as well as concerning other instances of lapses in journalism ethics. This review was sent to the top executives at the BBC. After an initial report on the editing in this documentary, the Telegraph published the contents of that memorandum.

Upon her departure, Turness took on the accountability, but then attempted to deflect accusations of partisan operations at the BBC.

“Our journalists are hardworking people who strive for impartiality, and I will stand by their journalism. There is no institutional bias. Mistakes are made, but there’s no institutional bias.”

This reframing of the effort has also been seen stateside, as none other than Brian Stelter weighed in on this weekend's developments. Instead of looking critically at the actions that have ensnared these top-rung executives, Stelter tried to recast the editing as a mere error that somehow flummoxed those putting together this documentary, timed to be released just days ahead of the election.

In a vacuum, a more-than-a-year-old editing misstep by unnamed producers would not cause the very top heads of the BBC to roll. But... pic.twitter.com/en62ptNFCQ
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) November 10, 2025

Please, Brian. How can you possibly classify what they did as a “misstep”?! The pieces of his speech that were cut together were not close enough for an oversight in editing. The BBC omitted the words that called for calm responses, and the portion that was added to recast Trump's words came from a portion of his speech spoken nearly an hour later. The editing completely recalibrated what Trump was saying. And further, the audio chicanery was intentionally hidden by making a video edit to hide the subterfuge at play.

But this pathetic excuse-making avoids what has been a central issue at the BBC, at least for the past few years. The news outlet has had many instances where it had to correct or retract its coverage of the Israel-Gaza war, as its errors have routinely been in favor of Hamas or been outwardly critical of Israeli actions. The internal memo also had numerous instances where BBC News had differing reports on the conflict from those seen in BBC Arabic, which frequently whitewashed details and atrocities by Hamas.

There was also the major scandal we covered in February, after the network put out another documentary, “Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone.” In that feature, the network highlighted the life of a young boy and other children, who were shown to endure hardships in the war-torn region. Not long after its release, problems were exposed.

The network initially took credit for the production, but then it was learned that the children were actually related to Hamas leaders. Then, a cameraman for the film was also shown to have Hamas ties. The BBC then shifted 180 degrees, saying the “documentary” was made by a separate film company, and disclosures were added to the feature. Once it was seen as a piece of pro-Hamas agitprop, the concerns reached into the halls of the British government, and ultimately, the network pulled the documentary entirely.

Tim Davie said of the debacle, “I lost trust in that film and therefore I took a decision to take it off iPlayer.” This episode had been called at the time by Samir Shah, Chairman of the BBC, a “dagger to the heart” of the network’s reputation. Now we are seeing that this journalism behavior is not a case of a one-off issue, but a problem with its entire operations.

When you have regular news reports that are error-prone, as well as completely compromised documentaries delivered on the regular, this is a reality that cannot be dismissed with “missteps.” This represents an institutional rot that has been brought about by a bias allowed to operate for some time. The BBC has become a deeply flawed entity, one in need of severe repairs.

Editor’s Note: After more than 40 days of screwing Americans, a few Dems have finally caved. The Schumer Shutdown was never about principle—just inflicting pain for political points.

Help us report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.