Democrats are having a rough time on Capitol Hill as they face off against various former business associates of the Biden family. Tony Bobulinski took center stage during the morning session, with his opening salvo targeting Rep. Jamie Raskin and Rep. Dan Goldman.
WATCH: Bobulinski Accuses Hunter and Jim Biden of Perjury, Lights Up Raskin and Goldman
In it, Bobulinski went after the two congressional members for pushing talking points meant to falsely frame the Biden family as innocent victims of their own dealings. That led to a tense scene in which Raskin interrupted the witness' opening testimony, something that normally isn't allowed to happen, leaving Chairman James Comer to bring order back to the hearing.
That leads me to Goldman's turn at questioning Bobulinski. What's so great about the former Trump impeachment lawyer turned House member is that he thinks he's smarter than he is. He truly believes he's a legal wizard who can talk people into corners, yet time and again, he beclowns himself during public hearings.
In this case, Goldman attempted to trap Bobulinski by suggesting no one ever responded to the infamous "10 percent for the Big Guy" email. Unfortunately, the former didn't have his facts straight.
"That's a blatant lie Mr. Goldman, you know better"
— Media Research Center (@theMRC) March 20, 2024
Tony Bobulinski calls out Rep. Goldman for trying to cover for the Biden crime family. pic.twitter.com/FcFQ5wz9zZ
As Bobulinski points out, numerous people including Hunter Biden did respond to the email. That left Goldman stammering as he then tried to spin a new conspiracy theory: That the Biden family was actually standing against the corruption being pushed by Hunter Biden's business associates.
The problem for Goldman is that he's left arguing every single person around the Bidens was corrupt except Joe and Hunter Biden. That's not a narrative that washes. Upstanding people do not surround themselves with corrupt people, and the fact that the DOJ has chosen to prosecute numerous business associates of the Bidens is evidence of selective bias, not innocence on the part of the president and his son.
For example, Goldman and his cohorts want you to believe that someone like Gal Luft has been discredited for being prosecuted for FARA violations when Hunter Biden allegedly did the exact same thing regarding his interactions with CEFC China.
On the contrary, the prosecution of Luft points to broader criminality among those who were leading the operation. That would be members of the Biden family, most notably Hunter Biden. Further, Goldman also has zero evidence to support the idea that Bobulinski was fired because he was corrupt but the Bidens weren't.
None of this looks good for Democrats. If you are explaining, you are losing, and Goldman isn't very good at explaining in the first place.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member