For 46 years, American hockey fans waited for this moment.
On Sunday, Team USA delivered. A 2–1 overtime win over Canada. Jack Hughes with the golden goal. Connor Hellebuyck turning aside 41 of 42 shots. The anthem rising. The flag stretched across shoulders slick with sweat and ice shavings. A gold medal earned the hard way.
It was the first U.S. men’s Olympic gold in 46 years.
And almost immediately, parts of the media went looking for a way to undercut it.
Newsweek did not frame the story as a historic American victory. It framed it as controversy. Its emphasis was not discipline, sacrifice, or a generational goalie performance. It was “rigged.”
The piece centered on a disputed “too many men on the ice” moment and then elevated anonymous social media complaints as the spine of the narrative. This is what it chose to spotlight:
You don’t call TOO MANY MEN but you call a 4 minute double minor?!
— manda 🥀 (@amxndareviews) February 22, 2026
RIGGED get out of here BYE. #CANvsUSA
RIGGED THERE WAS TOO MANY MEN ON THE ICE
— Made In Canada (@MadelnCanada) February 22, 2026
No formal protest. No overturned ruling. No evidence of cheating. Canada had a 5-on-3 power play and failed to score. The United States won in overtime. That is not scandal. That is sport.
ALSO SEE: Trump Has Epic Phone Call With US Olympic Hockey Team, Patel on Hand As He Invites Them to SOTU
USA Reclaims Hockey Gold, Edging Out Canada - 46 Years to the Day After the Miracle on Ice
Yet Newsweek converted random online frustration into implied legitimacy. It treated viral anger as if it were substance. It took unverified accusations and placed them at the center of a story about an American championship. Rather than neutral framing, that is narrative selection.
And the groundwork for that narrative was being laid even before the puck dropped.
Twenty-four hours before the gold medal game, HuffPost published a piece preemptively casting suspicion on American pride.
The headline: “There’s A Name For The Discomfort You’re Feeling Watching The Olympics Right Now.”
Before Team USA had even played for gold, readers were being coached on how to manage the moral tension of cheering for their own country. The article quoted therapists diagnosing patriotic pride as “cognitive dissonance.” It warned of the “weird mix of excitement and discomfort” that might accompany chanting “USA.”
It advised:
“If waving the American flag or chanting ‘USA!’ makes us feel grossed out or ashamed, we can cheer for individual athletes.”
Before the game was even played, HuffPost had already framed visible patriotism as something potentially embarrassing. It did not respond to controversy. It anticipated it. It instructed readers to distrust their own pride in advance.
So while American players were sacrificing teeth, blocking shots, and representing their country on the world stage, elite outlets were rehearsing how to shrink the moment. One primed readers to doubt the integrity of a win. The other primed them to doubt the legitimacy of their own celebration.
Then the win happened.
President Trump phoned into the locker room to congratulate the team. It was joyful, unscripted, unmistakably American.
“Congratulations. That was an unbelievable game... You're going to be proud of that game for 50 years.”
The players shouted back. They talked about medals. They talked about the White House. Pride without apology.
Across the country, Americans and the players responded the same way.
"This is all about our country right now. I love the USA... We're so proud to be Americans."
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 22, 2026
— Jack Hughes, @usahockey 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/XI9tcdKein
That is the divide.
Regular Americans saw a team that earned a victory. Newsweek saw an opportunity to amplify foreign accusations of cheating. HuffPost saw a teachable moment about the dangers of chanting USA.
One side celebrated effort and excellence. The other hedged, qualified, and moralized.
The players did not apologize. They did not hedge. They won.
HuffPost told readers to feel uneasy before the game was even played. Newsweek told them to question the win after it was over.
That is not a coincidence. It is instinct.
When America triumphs, too much of the legacy press reaches for suspicion. They elevate anonymous outrage. They launder bitterness into controversy. They treat patriotism like a diagnosis and victory like an asterisk.
The team earned gold. The country stood up and cheered.
The media squinted.
And that reflex — that inability to let an American win simply be a win — is the real story.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member