Election integrity was a key element in President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign. In March of 2025, shortly after resuming office, President Trump signed an executive order (EO) intended to increase election security and assure election integrity in American elections. A key component of that EO was the requirement for voters to provide proof of citizenship, establishing that they are eligible to cast their vote in federal elections, before being allowed to cast a ballot.
That doesn't seem an unreasonable requirement, unless you're a Democrat.
A U.S. District judge has now overturned that provision of the president's order.
Donald Trump’s request to add a documentary proof of citizenship requirement to the federal voter registration form cannot be enforced, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
US district judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington DC, sided with Democratic and civil rights groups that sued the Trump administration over his executive order to overhaul US elections.
She ruled that the proof-of-citizenship directive was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers, dealing a blow to the administration and its allies who have argued that such a mandate is necessary to restore public confidence that only Americans are voting in US elections.
“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote in her opinion.
The Constitution, in Article I, Section 4, states:
The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
There is no mention of responsibility or authority in Article II, describing the Executive Branch, over elections.
The ruling prohibits the US Election Assistance Commission from carrying out this portion of the EO:
The ruling grants the plaintiffs a partial summary judgment that prohibits the proof-of-citizenship requirement from going into effect. It says the US Election Assistance Commission, which has been considering adding the requirement to the federal voter form, is permanently barred from taking action to do so.
As of this writing, the White House has not responded to this ruling, although it's a safe bet President Trump will have something to say about it in time.
Read More: Bottom Line: Without Honest Elections, There Can Be No Republic
Democrats Insist It Never Happens—So Why Did 2,700 Illegal Immigrants Appear on Texas Voter Rolls?
A White House fact sheet on the original EO states in part:
- This Order strengthens voter citizenship verification and bans foreign nationals from interfering in U.S. elections.
- The Election Assistance Commission will require documentary, government-issued proof of U.S. citizenship on its voter registration forms.
- Agencies like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Social Security Administration and Department of State must provide states with access to Federal databases to verify eligibility and citizenship of individuals registering to vote.
- The Attorney General will prioritize prosecuting non-citizen voting and related crimes, including through use of DHS records and coordination with state attorneys general.
We might point out that Congress could act on this matter; the Constitution does clearly give them the authority to "make or alter such regulations."
It's likely that Judge Kollar-Kotelly's ruling will be appealed by the administration. Stay tuned.
Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.
Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.







Join the conversation as a VIP Member