I have to admit that “baseless” is just the latest in a long line of Democrat-spun words that triggers me! Because they are lying out their a$$e$. I don’t care what Rachel Maddow and the other fools at MSNBC (and a lot of others in the media) nervously bleat daily in trying to spin the reality of what happened last year. They are paid to spout the Democrat line and are liars. It’s a simple as that. And as Rasmussen polling reported on 20 July, even 37% of Democrats – 61% of all Americans – support investigating and fixing election integrity issues. Would the numbers be that high if people were confident that last year’s election was “the most secure ever”?

Good Morning !

The @GOP has raised hundreds of millions of dollars to investigate & fix election integrity issues. So when 37% of Democratic Party Voters agree here with Donald Trump, maybe that could be a sign as to where to invest the dough?

Story – https://t.co/4P7WjYPye8 pic.twitter.com/QwH8J8viFm

— Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) July 21, 2021

This report is the tenth in a weekly series conveying election-related information. Rachel and her cohort are oblivious to this information; they are willfully blind because they serve the Democrat Party. Each report contains new bombshells, and the trend is an ever-expanding interest among Americans about what really transpired last year – and the Democrat narratives are being roundly laughed off by most critical thinkers. The nine previous reports are linked here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here, and to reiterate, there are two excellent sources to catch up on independent analyses, reports, and other material involved election fraud during 2020. These should be at your beck and call for reference purposes as you engage with naysayers because the content is irrefutable:

• The 2020 Election Evidence Project is an incredible resource that continuously compiles evidence of election fraud – dozens and dozens of hot-linked sources.
• Promoting American Election Integrity has posted reports from their “team of authors of 2020 election-related analyses … whose expertise covers a wide range of fields (Cyber Security, IT, Statistics, Physics, Economics, etc.).”

Let’s move on to part ten in this continuing series:

Arizona.

• In a despicable and lying attempt to deflect from the hearing last week, the Democrat shills at the AP attempted to convey the falsehood that “Arizona county election officials have identified fewer than 200 cases of potential voter fraud out of more than 3 million ballots cast in last year’s presidential election.” This report was repeated endlessly in the legacy media echo chamber, for example by the virulently anti-Trump USA Today. In addition to the devastating information reported during that hearing as previously reported here, a USNA classmate nails them:

How interesting. With a detailed forensic audit in progress and all ballots in the hands of the auditors, the Associated Press is refuting the auditors by discussing the Arizona vote with the very officials probably most immersed in the perpetration of the fraud on Arizona’s voters. And not surprisingly, the AP agrees that there are no significant problems in Arizona.

The catch: Christie and Cassidy [the AP shills] call this Trump’s audit. It’s a tell, and its extension to ‘other battleground states’ with flimsy evidence shows that there will be a battle royale when the audit is complete and the report submitted does not match what the mainstream media has banked its future on.

• President Trump immediately put out a statement blasting that AP story. Gotta love that guy for not just rolling over like the RINOs constantly do! “When the real numbers are released, people will be shocked…” Remind me again when he has ever been proven wrong on the big stuff.

NEW!

"AP and other media outlets are doing major disinformation to try and discredit the massive number of voter irregularities and fraud found in both Arizona and Georgia. When the real numbers are released people will be shocked… pic.twitter.com/1YZru740Dg

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) July 17, 2021

• And state Senate President Karen Fann is a bit like Trump in her ongoing battles with the media, too. Trump led the way, and others are taking the baton:

That’s exactly right. When elections aren’t conducted according to the rules and electors block efforts to perform an audit, it’s very hard for people to accept the results https://t.co/76nhzdMn3U

— Karen Fann (@FannKfann) July 18, 2021

• Merissa Hamilton provided an excellent quick response briefing that debunks Maricopa County damage control tweets made after last week’s Senate hearing. “This briefing documents concerns with the responses by Maricopa County rapid response tweets to the Arizona Senate update with Cyber Ninjas, Mr. Cotton, and Ken Bennett on July 15th, 2021.”
• I really, really like this analysis of one particular number from the AZ senate hearing last week made by Harold Wren/Finch at The Library on Telegram:

11,326. A seemingly random number. A unique, specific number. So what’s in a number? 11,326.

That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in Maricopa County, AZ in the 2020 election.

That’s the exact number of people who illegally voted, had their votes counted, and added to the certified election results in AZ.

11,326. That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in AZ in Maricopa County and DID NOT APPEAR on any AZ voter rolls on 11/6/2021, but *magically* appeared on AZ voting rolls a month later.

Let me break down what that means:

11,326 people who weren’t registered voted in AZ illegally. Someone found this, and found they were not on the voting rolls.

Someone then added them to the voting rolls a month later, to try to cover this up & hide it.

The ONLY people who can change voting rolls is a state’s secretary of state.

Katie Hobbs. Soros bought & paid for Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

The same Katie Hobbs trying to stop the #AZaudit

You know what this shows?
1. Knowledge of the votes & no action taken to remove them from results.
2. Knowledge that someone was looking into it.
3. A DELIBERATE attempt to cover it up by illegally altering state records.

[Now it makes sense why Soros Democrat Katie Hobbs is flailing away trying to shut down the audit, doesn’t it?]

• Harold Wren/Finch then explained the implications of another key number reported at the hearing last week:

Maricopa County *deliberately* handed out over 168,000 *on-demand, election day* ballots that were on non-official, unsecure paper with alignment errors greater than 3000%.

What does that mean? Let’s break it down:

First, many of us including then-President Trump were urging people to vote on election day to prevent our ballots being intentionally lost or destroyed. This was also done to deny the cheaters a headstart in knowing how much fraud they had to produce to steal the Election.

The fraudulent, error filled ballots were designed to do two things:

1. Because of alignment errors, a legitimate vote for Trump would be scanned as a vote for Biden
2. Because Maricopa County told people to use & handed out sharpies & because the paper wasn’t thick enough, the sharpie bled through. This invalidated the ballot & it had to be duplicated. And these duplicates were nearly 100% cast for Biden.

This is especially egregious because the vast majority of all election day voters were Trump voters.

This was a planned fraud effort to *systematically* steal/invalidate election day votes from Donald Trump & down ballot candidates in Maricopa County.

• Here is what @KanekoaTheGreat on Telegram says about those 168,000 ballots and what is being referred to as “Sharpie-gate”:

168k ballots with calibration & bleed-through issues

-Printed off center on thin paper
-More Trump voters election day
-Previously DONT use sharpies
-Early voters DONT use sharpies
-Election Day USE sharpies
-Adjudication rate 11.27%
-Normal adjudication 2%
-Adjudicated ballots duplicated
-Duplicates missing serial numbers
-Duplicates not paired with originals
-What was original voters intent?

What possible excuse is there for printing ballots on thinner paper?

Why would election officials tell early voters to use pens and election day voters to use sharpies?

How much did thin paper and sharpies contribute to the more than 550% increase in adjudicated ballots?

Why are thousands of duplicated ballots missing serial numbers?

There is no excuse.

This is pre-planned, pre-printed, coordinated election fraud.

[And now the auditors’ report needs to confirm that evidence and more!]

• Harold Wren/Finch then explained the implications of a third key number from the hearing:

74,243 mail in ballots that were never mailed in Arizona were received, and counted, and were part of the certified election.

No records of these ballots exist in Arizona.

Do you know what that means? It means they used 74k fake, counterfeit mail in ballots to guarantee they had enough fraud to win in AZ.

There is no other explanation for 74,243 ballots that dont exist on record showing up and being counted.

• Here are some details from CyFIR’s Ben Cotton that he reported during last week’s Senate hearing:

1. Auditors have collected over 2,000 Terabytes of data, the vast majority is video footage.

2. What Maricopa County has toldthe public is often drastically different than their response to the legal subpoena.

3. Maricopa didn’t usea forensically secure process to clone drives. Dates and times were altered by their cloning process.

4. On March 11th, 2021 someone with Admin access to the (EMS) election management system ran a scriptthat produced 37,646 queries looking for blank passwords. The system has only 8 user accounts. (see below)

5. Windows Security Event Logs before February 5th, 2021 are missing.

6. Every election Administrator account, no matter the user, all have the same password.

7. When the Dominion software was installed in August 2019, Administrative passwords were created, and haven’t been changed since.

8. The vulnerabilitiesthat exist on the Maricopa election systems would take an average script kiddieless than 10 minutes to gain access to these systems.

9. Maricopa’s election system uses ibutton key fobs as the 2nd step in logins. Maricopa and Dominion have refused to provide these fobs to auditors.

[Read the rest here.]

• AG Mark Brnovich announced he is “looking into” allegations of illegal voting, but state Senator Kelly Townsend (R) wants to make sure he’s not just grandstanding. From Liberty Overwatch on Telegram:

AG’s Office Asks Secretary of State for Potential Evidence of Illegal Voting

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office has asked Secretary of State Katie Hobbs for potential evidence of illegal voting — a move that counters her request that he investigate a pressure campaign by former President Donald Trump’s allies to “stop the counting” last year.

The attorney general’s email response pointedly notes that Hobbs, a Democrat, hasn’t submitted referrals for double voting. It marks the first time in more than a decade a secretary of state has not done so.

[Townsend’s follow-up:]

This is a good start but I seriously want to know the intentions of the Arizona AG in regard to seeking truth about the findings thus far of the #ArizonaAudit. I suspect much of the American public want to know as well.
@GeneralBrnovichhttps://t.co/zQiBj6O5EC

— Senator Kelly Townsend (@AZKellyT) July 17, 2021

• State Senate President Karen Fann (R) called out the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors for not cooperating with the auditors again:

Wondering why Maricopa County prefers to tweet jabs instead of just sitting down and talking with the auditors If we work together we can finish this audit and let the voters know their ballots will be safe for future elections https://t.co/ZDCI6mPr6g

— Karen Fann (@FannKfann) July 17, 2021

• Maricopa County attorney Joseph LaRue is accused of lying to Sen. Fann by claiming that Maricopa isn’t participating in the Senate election audit because the auditors aren’t Election Assistance Commission certified, but the EAC doesn’t certify auditors, and he knows this:

A very disingenuous tweet@maricopacounty refuses to participate while being the only ones that know how their elections operate

Their strategy of gaslighting voters continues destruction of voter confidence and a toxic relationship with constituents https://t.co/LHyyt57qIA

— Merissa Hamilton (@merissahamilton) July 17, 2021

• According to National File, to obtain the routers and other evidence being withheld by Maricopa County, patriot organizers of the audit may attempt to obtain “a warrant for the evidence without going through the courts.” Legal backing for that move is detailed in the article.
• Here is how Maricopa County advertised the use of sharpies on Election Day (they KNEW what they were doing!):

Sharpies are not a problem for our tabulation equipment, and the offset columns on ballots ensure that bleed through won’t impact your vote. #yourvotecounts https://t.co/6iAjBkzunO

— Maricopa County (@maricopacounty) November 4, 2020

• Brian Cates on Telegram summarized Sharpie-gate:

They knew Sharpies bled through non-durable paper, which exactly why they printed thousands of ballots on the non-durable paper and got the Sharpies ready to hand out to all the TRUMP VOTERS they knew would show up on election day. To ensure the ballot was rejected by the tabulation machines in case the Sharpies didn’t cause enough bleed through, they also ensured these non-durable paper ballots were printed OFF CENTER. Once the ballot was rejected, that allowed them to either toss it or adjudicate it and switch it to a vote for Biden. Pretty crafty, eh? What did everybody learn here? Even with just paper ballots, these county officials have figured out a way to game the system and get a lot of ballots rejected so they can ‘fix’ them and ‘adjust’ them. How many elections have local and state officials pulled tricks like this to get ballots set aside and then ‘fixed’?

• @KanekoaTheGreat on Telegram also weighed in on Sharpie-gate:

#SharpieGate is real.

They printed election day ballots on thinner paper and told in person voters they “NEED” to use sharpies.

The majority of election day voters were Trump supporters and the Cyber Ninjas have documented how bleed-through issues due to sharpies and thin paper sent in-person ballots to adjudication.

The state of Arizona had a 550% increase in adjudicated ballots with over 11% of ballots being sent to adjudication.

In Maricopa, thousands of adjudicated ballots were duplicated and those duplications are missing serial numbers tying them back to their original ballots.

This is pre-planned, pre-printed, widespread election fraud.

• No one knows what would happen if/when it is finally determined that the election results were fraudulent. Here is what state Senate President Karen Fann said about it:

Fann told One America News Network (OANN), which has been covering the audit of Maricopa County, that the upper chamber has the ability to provide auditors with the materials they need—including via using subpoenas—but the certification of electors is a different matter. “The Senate body—we do not have the authority to do that. So, this is what we have said, and I want to make this very clear on the record,” [she said.]

[The only avenue: constant grassroots pressure on the political class at all levels to correct the error(s).]

• Attorney, scholar, and former White House legal advisor John Eastman disputed Sen. Fann’s statements in an interview with Steve Bannon on The War Room, as reported here:

Eastman told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.”

• Election expert David Shestokas explained further in an interview with TGP’s Jordan Conradson:

Conradson: Now, you’re a constitutional expert and an elections expert, what is the role of the state legislature in elections, and what authority does the Constitution grant them? 

Shestokas: The role of the state legislators, of course, the founding fathers wanted to put the control of elections as close to the people as possible. And so they set the rules, basically, to allow the state legislatures to pick the times, places, manners, and to regulate elections generally. But when it comes to the situation regarding the electors of the presidential choices of the Electoral College, The Constitution gives the states what they call plenary power. its one of the very few grants of plenary power within the Constitution and by that means the state legislatures have the authority by themselves without the participation of either the executive or the or the judiciary to, in fact, set the standards for choosing electors it’s in Article two, section one, and actually it’s easiest if I just read it directly because it says “each State shall appoint in such manner as the legislature thereof  may direct a number of electors equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in Congress.”

Conradson: So the state legislature has plenary authority over the electors in their state, what will it take to decertify Arizona’s election?

Shestokas: You know I want to note a couple of days ago, Arizona State Senate President Karen Fann made some comments in response to some questions in an interview about the limits on the power of the Arizona Senate, and I might mention that for the most part 99% of what Senator Fann had to say was correct because when asked about a question about the recall of electors, she said well the Senate doesn’t have that power, she’s correct in that regard because who has the power is the legislature in which case it would be the House and Senate, acting in concert.

• Finally, on the subject of “what happens next,” a respected USNA classmate weighs in on Telegram:

We will very probably advance shortly to the point where it is proven that “tampering [occurred] in several states where the vote was close — enough to change the result in the Electoral College.” We are going to have to put aside the screaming of those in the media and among Democratic officials that no matter what is found, the Presidential election must stand. It is and will be new territory, The Supremes will have to finally unpeel their butts from the sidelines. And one of three things might be possible:

1. A reelection in those states in which the vote was compromised to the point where the outcomes were in doubt or flipped.
2. The reward of the electoral votes in those states where fraud was found, fraudulent votes were thrown out or the fully audited results clearly indicated the results flipped to the formerly losing candidate, with a declaration of a new President.
3. A ruling by the Congress under the Twelfth Amendment or by the Supreme Court that electoral votes be reapplied and a new winner be declared.

There may be other possible remedies. And there is also the chance that there will be a massive sweeping of all of this fraud under the rug, and a contentious continuance of the present through 2022 and possibly through the 2024 election.

[One thing for sure: that’s going to take a lot of grassroots pressure!]

• Some ballot manufacturing/harvesting testimony from eyewitnesses will be provided in a court case, as reported here (the details in the article are explicit):

Eye witnesses to ballot manufacturing/harvesting operations in Arizona during and after the 2020 U.S. general election presented information to state officials in late 2020/early 2021. They were ignored.

The information is now being brought before a ‘We The People’ case using a ‘citizens grand jury’ in Georgia. Evidence is provided below ballots were sent to GA from AZ.

Georgia.

• This is the first of several excerpts of election analysis based on voter registration trends by former Army captain @RealSKeshel on Telegram; here is some of what he had to say about Georgia:

Biden – 2,473,633 (49.5%)
Trump – 2,461,854 (49.2%)

Much like Arizona, Trump set a high-turnout era boom with 373k added votes, solidifying support with standard conservatives and winning more black men.

Democrats on the other hand, though vote gain is expected with population growth, had been stuck in same 104k vote loop (Obama down 70k in 2012, Clinton up 104k), only for Biden to gain 597k in one election to win the state by an eyelash. 14,000 fraudulent votes kept David Perdue from winning on 11/3 and sent him to runoff.

Pattern is heavy cheating in metro ATL counties and shaving in northern GA exurban and rural counties that are massively pro-Trump. Estimate 311k excess votes (Gwinnett & Fulton 35k, DeKalb 30k, Cobb 25k).

If accurate on 311k excess, Trump margin should have been roughly 52.6 to 46.1 (6.5%) with a margin of 299k votes.

[Note: some readers are confused about what “excess votes” mean. Simply put, excess votes are the number of votes greater than the vote total that is possible. The best example we can use is that Biden received 120k more votes in the first two Maricopa dumps than his vote total for Maricopa at the end of the election — then “counted votes” for ten more days. Where did the excess votes go? Only the routers can tell us. Another example of excess votes in Maricopa is that there are 74k more absentee ballots than absentee ballots mailed out to voters. Yet another example would be more votes than registered voters in a particular jurisdiction.]

• Oops! It’s not just Fulton County. As reported by @disclosetv on Telegram, “VoterGA has obtained new evidence that the election discrepancies in other Georgia counties may be worse than those it uncovered in Fulton County.”

• In a continuing story, The Federalist is exposing more perfidy by Sec’y of State Brad Raffensperger. Did he knowingly spike efforts to investigate voter fraud after whistleblower reports and other evidence was made available to his office? His ongoing efforts to blame others won’t save his political career.

[T]wo of President Trump’s attorneys in the Georgia election lawsuit told The Federalist that both before and after the election contest was filed, the Secretary of State’s Office refused all efforts to address this and other illegal categories of voting identified by the president’s legal team and hindered their attempts to contest the election and resolve serious concerns regarding illegal votes cast and counted on November 3, 2020.

Cleta Mitchell, now a senior legal fellow for election integrity at Conservative Partnership Institute, helped lead the Georgia challenge. She told me “the Georgia secretary of state completely stonewalled every allegation of illegal votes.” “He just kept saying, ‘We have information that disputes these claims,’” Mitchell added, referring to the Secretary of State’s Office, “but he never made that information available.”

Raffensperger should not have proclaimed after the November 2020 election that there were not enough illegal votes to affect the presidential election’s outcome.

• The Federalist added another element to the story in a subsequent article. Raffensperger is spinning like crazy.

[W]hat we have then, is the Secretary of State’s Office defending the counting of the ballots of those who broke the law and even excusing those violations, while those who followed the law remained unable to cast ballots at all. One must wonder too how seriously the Secretary of State’s Office takes the investigation into the 10,000-plus residents if its COO frames those who violate Section 21-2-218 as merely “trying to exercise their right to vote.”

So which is it, Raffensperger? Are the 10,300-plus—and potentially up to 35,000—voters who may have cast ballots illegally in a county in which they didn’t live “just trying to exercise their right to vote”? Or did many of them deceive election workers by falsely signing an oath affirming they still reside in their old county?

• Is this a CYA move, or is it an attempt to shut down investigations into election fraud? Some cracks in the GA Democrat façade, or deviousness?

GA House Speaker David Ralston called for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) to look into election fraud in Fulton County, GA. … Ralston is the most powerful politician in Georgia, and the most feared. Fulton County Chairman Robb Pitts, who has infamously denied any criminality at all in his jurisdiction, has now asked for all GA counties to be investigated. … [We are very concerned about the GBI getting involved at all. Using state law enforcement will provide a vehicle to stop all other investigations and possibly cover up the crime altogether.

• US Senate and local Georgia Democrats like Stacey Abrams staged a “field hearing” on Monday in Atlanta for the first time in decades to promote the Democrat narrative that Republicans are infringing on voting rights by passage of new election integrity laws.

Michigan.

• Here are some excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis in Michigan:

Biden – 2,804,040 (50.6%)
Trump – 2,649,852 (47.8%)

MI tracks PA in terms of voter tendencies; since 2008, declining Dem participation and increasing Republican, especially under Trump. Obama lost 303k in 2012, Clinton another 296k. Trump gained 370k amidst this coalition shift in a shrinking state, only to be lapped by Biden with 535k after no new net positive Dem votes in 12 years.

As a general rule, states in population decline with a massive coalition shift (party switching) going on are not going to show massive gains for both sides. The counties in MI all track with PA counties. Not one clean county here – an easy Trump win as we saw on 11/3 in progress.

If Biden is 527k heavy, Trump margin of victory in MI was about 52.9% to 45.4%, or 7.5% overall (373k votes).

[Note: not a single green/clean county in Michigan! Where is the Republican Party?? See the next two bullets including the last bracketed comment for some reasons.]

• Michigan RINOs in the state House of Representatives folded in their attempts to “add an ID component to absentee ballot applications and to institute signature verification at polling places”:

Rep. Ann Bollin, who chairs the House Elections and Ethics Committee, told The Associated Press that she and many other House Republicans oppose a Senate-passed bill that would require absentee ballot applicants to include a copy of their photo ID, their driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number. Those who do not would get a provisional ballot and have to either verify their voter registration or their identity and residence within six days after the election for it to count.

[Refer to this Wednesday article about the Michigan GOP for some context.]

• As reported here, it looks like five counties are going to defy a cease and desist order and destroy 2020 election data through a battery swap-out maintenance action:

At least five counties in Michigan are reportedly moving ahead with the destruction of data from the 2020 Election on the voting equipment they used in the election.  The problem with this is that the procedure that the vendor is performing reportedly removes all data from the machines but federal law states that information related to the 2020 Election is to be maintained in safekeeping for 22 months after the election.  Also, all the counties in the state have been provided a ‘cease and desist’ order preventing them from removing the data from the machines.

[This is criminal; what are they trying to hide by breaking the federal requirement for preserving election data for 22 months?]

Minnesota.

• Here are excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis of Minnesota:

Biden – 1,717,077 (52.40%)
Trump – 1,484,065 (45.28)%

Trump is up 161k votes from 2016 as the state nearly dropped into the GOP column, but Biden is up 349k after two consecutive elections of fewer votes, including Clinton down 178k from Obama’s re-election. They will gain votes in 2020 thanks to third parties returning.

Fair share of green counties here, but there are a ton of rural, tiny counties with little play in numbers. Hennepin is a cesspool, and Ramsey a smaller version. Biden is 2x Obama’s high turnout era record gain, plus another 30k. I’ve afforded him Obama ’08 gain plus 25%, same as Ramsey, almost certainly high.

If Biden is 228k heavy, Trump would be within 5k votes, at 0.1% margin. I suspect I’m way light on Hennepin, and believe this was a 1-3 point Trump state. Ellison told you at 4 PM on 11/3 he didn’t have the votes.

• Some additional amplification/analysis from @RealSKeshel here:

Key points:

*MN resembles WI; PA/MI resemble each other. Third party vote very swingy coming back to two parties in MN.

*I have Trump down to the wire here, with Biden well over what I would call 200k excess expected votes.

*I have been generous to Biden, allowing 125% of Obama’s historic high turnout era (2004-present) gains in Hennepin and Ramsey.

*St. Louis Co. is way too high for Biden under recent trends, enough for local Dem mayors to endorse Trump in Iron Range.

*AG Ellison tweeted late in afternoon of 11/3 they didn’t have the votes to win the state, just before they won the Obama-Romney race margin, after Trump spent big time there and campaigned?

*WI and MN were 7-8% Obama states in 2012 and MN 2.3% left of WI in 2016. I have WI to Trump at 3.7%. I’m sure I’m light in Twin Cities and would expect it to tilt to Trump up to as much as 2.5%.

*Lewis won the Senate seat with numbers like this.

New Hampshire.

• Here are some excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis in New Hampshire:

Biden – 424,921 (52.71%)
Trump – 365,654 (45.36%)

NH was a near-flip for Trump in 2016, just under 3k difference. Trump’s anti-war stance made him a perfect fit to flip NH, as the Iraq War is a key reason Bush lost it in 2004 after carrying it in 2000. Working class shift in effect as seen in the Midwestern states, Dem peak being in 2008, with a heavy share of independent voters.

If Biden is 40k heavy, his lead would dwindle to 50.3 to 47.8% (2.5%), or just 19k votes. If there is vote flipping electronically, this is likely a Trump state. I had it two or less to either candidate (tilt) leading up to the election.

• The “final forensic audit report” of Windham township is out, and it smells as fishy as a 7-day-old Atlantic cod (see Keshel’s analysis above):

The overall findings of the final New Hampshire SB 43 Forensic Audit Report conclude that the discrepancy between election night totals and the recounts in Windham can be attributed to “unforeseen consequences and misfortune.” The report blamed the vote count differences for the candidates—specifically St. Laurent—on “harried election officials,” and the folding machine borrowed to fold ballots, as well as how they were “ironed” after being folded. Ballot “ironing” occurs typically with a coin or a scissors handle and is done to further flatten the ballot. Describing the fold debacle as an isolated incident exclusive to Windham, they insist there is no reason to believe the folding machine was adjusted to create the ballot fold problem. The report points out that the 402-page New Hampshire Election Procedure Manual contains no instructions on folding (or not folding) absentee ballots.

[Alfred E. Neuman: What, me worry?]

Oklahoma.

• An Oklahoma state representative has called for an independent forensic audit in his state:

Oklahoma State Representative Sean Roberts, R-Hominy, announced … that he is requesting the State Election Board Secretary call for a “forensic and independent audit” of the 2020 general elections in Oklahoma County and two other random counties in the state.

[Grassroots pressure is working once again!]

Ohio.

• Here are some excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis of Ohio:

Trump – 3,154,834 (53.27%) Biden – 2,679,165 (45.24%)

OH was a blowout in 2016, higher than most predicted, with the margin slightly lighter this year, but with more votes won by. This state, regionally, is clean, compared to the cesspools that are MI and PA. I estimate Biden to be 88k higher than trends, population growth, previous records, and population growth would suggest.

Most curiously (sarcasm), Cuyahoga Co. (Cleveland) didn’t appear to have nearly the level of interest in candidate Biden as Wayne Co. (MI) and nearby Allegheny Co. (PA) did. Biden gained just 18k votes, but with declining voter roll and a solid Trump gain, I still flagged 8k as class yellow.

Franklin is the only red, 15k excess, 19% over Obama ’08 new vote growth with solid Trump gain opposing.

If Biden is 88k heavy, Trump’s margin would have been 9.7% (54.0-44.3), a win of 564k votes.

[Yet another likely manipulation of the popular vote in a Red state to bump up The Hologram’s numbers.]

Pennsylvania.

• Here are some excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis in the state:

Biden – 3.458m (50.0%)
Trump – 3.338m (48.8%)

Even worse than I thought. PA was a slam dunk for Trump, with a 244k-12k (21 to 1 ratio) of net new registration in.4 years that previously predicted Trump flip in 2016.

This is horrific. Only 3 counties I see as relatively clean, with 27 classified as major. 60 of 67 counties should have been more GOP than last time per registration trends, but only 20 trended more GOP. This flipped Erie and Northampton, which should have been slam dunks.

Trump crushed Obama ’08 total in a shrinking state, only to be passed on strength of what I assess to be 504k excess votes!

Trump margin, if accurate, should have been 52.0% to 46.1% (5.9%), or 424k votes. A bludgeoning in keeping with registration trend.

• Another PA county is pushing back on state Sen. Doug Mastriano’s plan for a 3-county audit:

Commissioners in York County, in a recent letter obtained by The Epoch Times, told Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, that the panel he chairs, the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee may lack jurisdiction of elections oversight.

Commissioners also expressed concern with outside parties potentially gaining access to voting systems if a forensic probe does occur, pointing to a recent directive by the Pennsylvania Department of State that warned counties against providing such access. And they included questions about funding, wondering which body would be expected to pay for a probe.

But they left open complying with the requests if subpoenas were issued.

[Note: York is one of those counties marked red (serious concerns) by Seth Keshel. What are they hiding?]

• Soros-backed Democrat Secretary of State Veronic Degraffenreid is trying to get out ahead of the 3-county audit by decertifying voting machines in one of the counties:

Pennsylvania’s top election official has decertified the voting machines of a small southern county that disclosed that it had agreed to requests by local Republican lawmakers and allowed a software firm to inspect the machines as part of an “audit” after the 2020 election.

Degraffenreid notified Fulton County officials in a letter Tuesday that the inspection violated state law. It was done in a manner that “was not transparent or bipartisan” and the firm had “no knowledge or expertise in election technology,” Degraffenreid wrote.

[I say again, Democrats: what are you frantically trying to hide in Pennsylvania?]

Texas.

Here are some excerpts from Seth Keshel’s election analysis of Texas:

Trump – 5,890,347 (52.1%)
Biden – 5,259,126 (46.5%)

Estimating 675k excess votes for Biden, conservatively estimated. This would still give him a record high Dem vote gain, as he was up 1.38mm from Clinton, with Trump also up at a record number 1.21mm. Counties over 50k listed in spreadsheet screenshot.

No party [registration], heavy on 20 year pattern plus political trend. Trump trended Hispanic TX heavily Republican, but somehow “lost” Tarrant County and lost big margins in suburbs despite huge ~30% gains or more in all of them. Dem activity is obvious, many suburbs over 60% growth, huge urbans over 40%.

Put simply, massive Trump gains in San Antonio, Fort Worth, and Houston don’t agree historically with a corresponding massive Dem jump in those counties.

If accurate on 675k excess, Trump margin should have been roughly 55.4 to 43.1 (12.3%) with a margin of 1.3mm votes instead of 631k.

[In short, there were shenanigans going on even in ostensibly red Texas!]

• Here are some excerpts from state Rep. Steven Toth’s bill (HB241) requiring a forensic audit in every Texas county with a population exceeding 415,000 people: 

(a) The governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the house of
representatives shall appoint an independent third party to conduct
a forensic audit of the general election that took place on November
3, 2020.
(b) The independent third party appointed under Subsection
(a) shall audit every precinct in each county with a population of
415,000 or more.
(c) The audit under this section must begin not later than
November 1, 2021, and be completed not later than February 1, 2022.
(d) Not later than March 1, 2022, the independent third
party conducting the audit under this section shall submit a report
to the governor, lieutenant governor, speaker of the house of
representatives, and each member of the legislature detailing any
anomalies or discrepancies in voter data, ballot data, or
tabulation.

[More evidence that grassroots pressure is working!]

Wisconsin.

• Here are some excerpts from @RealSKeshel’s election analysis in Wisconsin:

Biden – 1,630,866 (49.45%)
Trump – 1,610,184 (48.82%)

WI is a little swingy with third party and independents, with more play in those numbers than PA and MI. Additionally, with a much smaller state, excess vote totals are lower. Estimating Biden at 139k statewide excess in a state he “won” by 21k, on the strength of a 3:42 AM vote drop on 11/4 of 168,000 ballots going 85/15% for him.

Dane and Milwaukee both appear to be 15k heavy (lenient). The state, mostly within these two counties, had 244k “indefinitely confined” voters due to COVID, 4x the amount they had in the previous election. This allows a workaround to voter ID. Trump still trended western WI, which was key to his 2016 win.

If Biden is 139k heavy, Trump margin in WI was about 51.0% to 47.2%, or 3.8% overall (118k votes).

• A state representative is upping the ante on audits thanks to revelations in Arizona and Georgia and grassroots pressure:

State Rep. Timothy Ramthun, a Republican, formally requested “a more comprehensive audit” from former state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who is leading a conducting a review of the election at the behest of Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos along with retired police officers, and the Legislative Audit Bureau, which lawmakers authorized earlier this year to investigate the election.

More in this separate report: “Ramthun wants Wisconsin’s Legislative Audit Bureau to look and see if Wisconsin had any machine-folded mail-in ballots, or ballots that were printed as opposed to filled in by hand. He also wants to know if there were some absentee ballots that came back too perfect.”

Miscellaneous.

• Let’s start of this category with an optimistic op-ed from Real Clear Politics about “the walls closing in on Biden” regarding election fraud. An excerpt:

Our democracy is being tested. Some of us want to know (if the election were truly as secure as Biden claims!) why Democrats are doing everything in their power to prevent the people from seeing the ballots, from accessing the voting machines and from confirming the chain of custody. What are they afraid of?

Maybe they are afraid of 259, the number of electoral votes that Biden would have if the election results from Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania were decertified. Remember, you need 270 votes to be elected president, and more and more people are wondering whether or not Joe Biden really was duly elected.

Let’s face it: This was not supposed to happen. The joint congressional session on Jan. 6, 2021, was supposed to put an end to all doubt. It was the last chance for the federal government to object to the results of the election, and various Republican senators and members of Congress were indeed going to object, but because of the incursion into the Capitol building that occurred that day, the best chance to publicly expose a national scandal evaporated as the media manufactured its last hit job on President Trump.

The walls are closing in, but this time it isn’t Trump who will be running scared.

• Social media personality @KanekoaTheGreat on Telegram reminds us that the GOP establishment (a/k/a RINO) are at odds with the Republican base about the 2020 election results:

In January 2021, Mitch McConnell called Trump’s election fraud claims “sweeping conspiracy theories”.

In February 2021, Ronna McDaniel told The New York Times that she thought it was a mistake to allow Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell to make claims about election rigging.

In May 2021, Kevin McCarthy said that “nobody is questioning the legitimacy of the election”.

Actually, Kevin, the majority of the GOP base believes that the 2020 election was stolen!

And, how are those “sweeping conspiracy theories” working out in Arizona and Georgia, Mitch?

[The RINO theory of “sweeping conspiracy theories” is a false as the Democrats’ “baseless claims” of election fraud, isn’t it? Time – and evidence! – have brought clarity!]

• @KanekoaTheGreat didn’t stop there. He turned up the gain on RNC Chairman Ronna McDaniel for sitting on over $200 million in donations from Trump supporters who expected the RNC to join election lawsuits but instead sat on their hands and pocketed the money. Last week, she finally squeaked about Fulton County fraud after months of silence. There must be a lot of rank-and-file Republicans telling the RNC to “stick it” on donations! Keep up the grassroots pressure, folks:

Wow! Ronna Romney talking about election fraud!

She managed to raise 9-figures off of election fraud without spending any money on election fraud!

There are about to be a whole lot of audits around the country that could use that money.

Unfortunately, Ronna Romney won’t be helping fund election audits because her uncle and a whole bunch of swamp RINOs love election fraud!

Election fraud allows swamp RINOs to push endless wars, broken trade deals, and continuous corruption without worrying about representing the will or earning the votes of the American people.

• Check out this short video montage of what Democrats were saying about electronic access to election management systems back in 2018 and compare that to their lock-step denials in 2021!

Here are Democrats in 2018 saying everything Mike Lindell says about voting machines pic.twitter.com/IFZ2sEhmZ9

— Fed Recruiter Poso 😎 (@JackPosobiec) July 19, 2021

• Harold Wren (formerly Harold Finch) on Telegram in the Library skewered a fake conservative for dissing election audits. These people are all revealing who they really are:

And tweets like this are why no conservatives take Eric Erickson seriously. He’s a useful idiot grifting off naive people and used like a lapdog by Leftists.

No, I do not take the “election audits” seriously. They are not real audits, but theater with a pre-ordained outcome determined to both perpetuate a grievance based on a lie and perpetuate a platform for grift against gullible sore losers.

— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 17, 2021

• Dave (a/k/a “Praying Medic”) provides a cautionary note on the uncertainty if/when enough election fraud is proven to have changed election results because these audits are unprecedented in US history:

Post-election audits of this magnitude have never been done. There is no clear constitutional remedy or historical precedent for changing the outcome of a fraudulent presidential election. We’re in uncharted territory. We don’t know with certainty how state legislatures will act if, and when, their audits find fraud. We have no way of knowing how the courts will respond. There is no reason to believe Congress will take action. It’s anyone’s guess as to whether state Attorneys General will investigate evidence of fraud.

[Relentless grassroots pressure will be required to reset the political class in the US and implement measures that guarantee real election integrity.]

• To be filed in the “tell us something we didn’t already know” file, the polls got it all wrong in terms of support for Trump, as reported by Newsmax:

“The AAPOR task force examined 2,858 polls, including 529 national presidential race polls and 1,572 state-level presidential polls. They found that the surveys overstated the margin between President Biden and former President Donald Trump by 3.9 points in the national popular vote and 4.3 percentage points in state polls, the Post reported.

Polls understated Trump support in nearly every state and by an average of 3.3 percentage points overall…”

• Lastly, here is the result of another form of grassroots pressure, as viewership of the legacy media has tanked over the last year, as reported by Glenn_Greenwald on Telegram (and I just love it!): “Without Trump, the Atlantic has lost more than half of its online audience in the last year alone. The NYT and the Guardian have lost 1/3 of theirs. MSNBC and CNN’s cable ratings are even worse.”

[Could increasing cynicism about their attempts to perpetuate the false Democrat narrative of “baseless claims of election fraud” be one reason? Almost certainly, along with lying about the Arizona hearing last week – a sure sign of panic.]

Conclusion. The trend is ever more evidence and revelations of election fraud in 2020. This is bad news for the Democrat Party and greatly strengthens Republican efforts to pass new election integrity laws in states around the country. And that trend also explains the increasing desperation of the Democrat-media complex to stonewall, obfuscate, lie, and attempt to explain it all away. Not going to work, as more Americans are getting red-pilled every day! Keep up the pressure on all of your elected representatives because it is having a positive effect.

The end.