BBC's Laura Kuenssberg's Kamala Harris interview is a window not just into how bad Harris is as a political candidate, but how bad the American liberal media has been at their job, i.e., questioning her on important issues.
As we reported on Friday, Kuenssberg got Harris to drop some hints that she might run in the future and then nailed her on how bad her chances reportedly were — that she was behind The Rock in the betting odds.
That was pretty hilarious. But that wasn't all.
Kuenssberg dared to put THE question to Harris — the "Joe Biden cognitive decline" question.
Kuenssberg noted that Biden's issues had been the subject of "months of speculation around the world" and that they'd "asked Nancy Pelosi what was going wrong." But she said Biden didn't raise his frailty with Harris, and she didn't raise it with him. "That’s extraordinary to read in your account," Kuenssberg said to Harris.
Kamala's response was awful.
"I do reflect on whether I should have had a conversation with him, urging him not to run"
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) October 26, 2025
Former US VP Kamala Harris says she had concerns about Joe Biden’s ability to campaign for re-election but not about “his capacity to be president”#BBCLauraK https://t.co/CkTHGctZ4k pic.twitter.com/IAajQISKQQ
She said there was a "serious difference between capacity to be president of the United States and the capacity to run for president of the United States" and that her concern was about "his ability, with the level of endurance, energy that it requires, especially running against now the current president," but that she was never questioning Biden's capacity to occupy the highest position in the land.
Wait, what? Is she kidding? Actually doing the job is even more involved than running for it. Look at what President Donald Trump has been doing in the last day in Malaysia, not to mention everything he's done in the past several months. He hit the ground running and hasn't stopped.
READ MORE: Trump in Malaysia: Epic Trump Dance, Peace Accords, and Big Deals for US
Her answer doesn't even make any sense. Well, unless you're talking about other people running things behind the scenes for Biden at the White House. The fact that she says that reveals she doesn't grasp the requirements of the office for which she ran. Unless she wants to tell us more about what was going on at the White House and what people did for Biden?
Kuennsberg nailed her on that.
"Isn't it a strange message to the public to say, you know what you need to be tougher and more able to run a political campaign than actually to be the person behind the desk in the Oval Office, to be the person making decisions in the Situation Room. So did you just not think it was that bad or did you feel you just couldn’t raise it?
Exactly!
But again, Harris' answer was empty. She continued to say she was concerned about Biden running.
She says she does reflect now on whether she should have had a conversation with Biden about not running because of what it would require. But she said she wondered if it would have been an "effective and productive conversation," given what could appear as her "self-interest."
But that's exactly what the job entails: making hard decisions and pushing things. We see Trump doing it every day. Kamala can't even put that basic question to Joe Biden? And she thinks now that she's not "done" yet and might run in the future? Why would anyone vote for her when she doesn't seem to have the basic tools for the job? And she doesn't get what she's said in that answer: that Biden really wouldn't have trusted that coming from her.
Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.
Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member