We’re all aware of a sickness in our public life right now. To be honest, I'd call it much more of a spiritual attack from darkness. But at the very least, it's a widespread cultural delusion of gender ideology. The symptoms are not coming from the parents who are asking hard questions. It is coming from the people who cannot tolerate those questions.
This week, video surfaced of Madeline Mann, a UCSF administrator, threatening to kill a woman for speaking out against gender transition surgeries on minors. The target was Beth Bourne, a mother who has been critical of medical interventions pushed on children struggling with gender dysphoria. Instead of rebutting her arguments, Mann escalated to a death threat.
San Francisco @CA_Dem convention (Feb. 21) — A trans activist tells @bourne_beth2345: “I'm gonna hunt you down and f—king kill you.”
— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) March 2, 2026
Why? She was being told about how much doctors, clinics & hospitals were making performing trans surgeries on children.pic.twitter.com/J8bIw38hzZ
We are not talking about a random anonymous troll online. We are talking about a university administrator tied to one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the country, the University of California, San Francisco. UCSF is not a fringe activist blog. It is a powerhouse in medical research and pediatric care. Parents trust institutions like that with their children’s lives.
And one of its administrators is caught on video threatening violence against a critic of child gender surgeries.
If you want to understand where we are as a culture, start there.
ALSO SEE: The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization
Falling Like Dominoes: NYU Langone Health Hospital Will End Its 'Transgender Youth Health' Program
Madeline Mann is married to Merlin Mann, a podcaster who has built a brand in progressive tech circles. Together, they reportedly transitioned their daughter at age 15. That is not ancient history. That is a recent, life-altering decision made while their child was still legally a minor.
Now think about that context. You have a family that made a deeply controversial medical choice for their teenager. You have a national debate raging about puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. And you have critics raising concerns about consent, long-term harm, and the explosion of diagnoses in adolescent girls over the last decade.
You can disagree with those critics. You can call them wrong. But when your response is to threaten to kill one of them, you are not defending science. You are revealing something darker.
For years, parents, pastors, and even secular feminists have been labeled bigots for asking basic questions. What are the long term outcomes? What are the regret rates? Why are so many clinics rushing kids through affirmation models with minimal psychological evaluation?
Instead of answering those questions, activists try to shut them down, resorting to labels and just the right amount of outrage. This pattern has been on a constant loop in our culture over the last decade. The loudest voices in any ideological movement eventually show their true posture. If your position is strong, you argue. If it is fragile, you threaten.
As a father of two boys, I cannot read this story without thinking about my own kids. Fifteen is still a child. Fifteen-year-olds cannot vote. They cannot sign contracts. They cannot buy alcohol. They can hardly keep up with their chores. Yet we are supposed to believe they can consent to lifelong medical interventions that alter their bodies and fertility.
And if you dare question that, some activist with institutional power might threaten your life.
Fanaticism at its worst.
Supporters of pediatric transition insist this is about love and affirmation. But love does not scream at mothers. Love does not threaten violence. Love does not demand silence. Love is patient. Love is willing to be examined.
The reality is that institutions like UCSF have staked their reputations on this model of care. Billions of dollars in research grants, pharmaceutical pipelines, and clinical programs are now tied to gender medicine. When critics challenge the foundation, they are not just challenging feelings. They are challenging power. And power does not like to be questioned.
Of course, the tragedy in all of this is that children are caught in the middle. Real kids. Confused kids. Hurting kids. They deserve careful, slow, cautious medicine. They deserve therapists who explore root causes, not clinicians who rush them toward irreversible decisions. They deserve adults who are steady and calm.
What they do not deserve is to become symbols in an ideological war so heated that administrators threaten to kill critics.
UCSF must address this threat publicly and decisively. Silence would send a chilling message. It would tell parents across the country that institutional elites are so invested in this ideology that they will tolerate intimidation to protect it.
This debate is not going away. More countries in Europe are scaling back pediatric gender interventions. More detransitioners are coming forward. More lawsuits are being filed against doctors who fast-tracked teenagers into surgeries they later regret. And thank God that in recent months, several rulings have made it clear that truth is not hate, biology is not bigotry, and the law will not be bullied into affirming delusion.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member