Earlier this week, I wrote an article about how far the UK had fallen. So much so that while the Islamic insurgency in the country is a definite issue, the larger issue is the fact that the people's own government has drifted so radically to the left that it turned against them.
If the UK is to reverse what's going on in their country, they're going to have to do something to radically alter the government first.
And it goes all the way to the top:
Kicking Kier Starmer out is a good start, but this doesn't stop once he's done. It doesn't even stop once the Labour Party is kicked out of office. Many of the laws that would make Americans' jaws drop were passed under governments that weren't just leftist.
The UK's Online Safety Act 2023 was enacted under the Conservative Party government — the British equivalent of a center-right party. Critics argue the law, combined with existing UK speech laws, has contributed to police scrutiny of allegedly “offensive” online speech, including cases where officers have visited people over social media posts. The King himself has recently said the state was moving forward with Digital ID.
Read: The British People Are Facing a Threat Far Greater Than an Islamic Takeover
As if to prove what I'm talking about here, a story popped up a few days ago about a young man named Henry Nowak.
Nowak was stabbed to death by a man named Vickrum Singh Digwa. Now, to be clear, Digwa is not a Muslim. He's Sikh, but this distinction doesn't change the overall point.
According to reports, Nowak, 18, was walking home drunk and sending his friends videos on Snapchat. He ran into Digwa, 23, and according to the story Digwa fed the police, Nowak began attacking him. So Digwa pulled out his knife and stabbed him eight times.
Neighbors immediately call the police.
In a sane world, the moment police showed up, they would've arrested Digwa. Clearly, you have a teenager who's been stabbed multiple times. He's bleeding profusely, and authorities would know that, because the blood trail Nowak left behind as he tried to flee Digwa indicated such.
But the police didn't arrest Digwa. He made the claim that Nowak was being racist toward him, and the police arrested Nowak instead. The teen told them he couldn't breathe because Digwa had stabbed him in the lung, and he was drowning in his own blood, but the police shrugged him off.
"I can't breathe" were Nowak's last words before he died there on the sidewalk in police custody, while his killer was nearby, healthy and uncuffed.
🚨 18-year-old student Henry Nowak filmed a Sikh man openly carrying an 8-inch knife.
— Michael McCarthy (@punishablepress) May 16, 2026
Moments later he was stabbed 4 times.
When police arrived, they handcuffed Henry who was fatally stabbed because the attacker claimed he was the racist.
He drowned in his own blood. pic.twitter.com/cIajFDYAFq
A few things to point out here.
It's illegal to carry knives around in the UK, but Digwa is allowed to carry his because his Sikh blade is part of his religion.
According to the BBC, after the altercation went down, Digwa's mother, 53-year-old Kiran Kaur, attempted to hide Digwa's knife. She, too, is now on trial.
The question is, why would Digwa and his mother feel the need to do that if everything Digwa said was true?
But the point to focus on here is that when police arrived, they didn't bother getting all the information or assessing the situation. A claim of racism was made, and the kid who was literally bleeding out and trying to warn authorities that something was severely wrong was clapped in cuffs and placed on the ground as blood was literally seeping from his wounds.
All it took was for the non-white person to claim a white person committed a racist act, and that was enough for British authorities.
The bottom line of this story is that British authorities effectively helped a non-white person kill a white person based on the claim that the white person was being racist.
In a just system, not only would Digwa get the maximum punishment for his crime, but the arresting officers would also face justice; however, I'm not sure that they would be considered as having done something wrong by the current British system. Judging by the stories coming out of the UK, this is the new "by the book" way to handle these situations.
The British are guilty until proven innocent, especially if they're white.
