It is clear that our media complex is in a concerted effort to bring down FBI Director Kash Patel, but the methodology reveals the hollowness of the charges. This, of course, all stems from the report made in The Atlantic just over a week ago, but after all of the shrieking and arm waving over this, once you analyze the process, we can see the flaw in the entire approach.
This is a serving of a drink with a mountain of garnishes, lighting a float of rum, and featuring a tiny umbrella and a lit sparkler, all for a concoction that is not at all potable.
READ MORE: The Atlantic’s Kash Patel Hit Piece Is Backfiring - Badly
To start, the original article by Sarah Fitzpatrick arrived after being shopped around other outlets. There had to be resistance based on the detail of not a single source being willing to go on the record. Meanwhile, numerous individuals from the Bureau were on the record, steadfastly denying the claims. After coming out Apr. 17, all through the weekend, there was light interest in following up the report at other outlets. In fact, when Reuters attempted to do the usual “independently corroborated” gameplay, the outlet confessed it had been incapable of confirming any of the sourcing.
It was only after Kash Patel filed his lawsuit against Fitzpatrick and The Atlantic that news outlets had the safety to report on accusations against him. The rest of the week was more revealing. Instead of concentrating on the specifics of the article, it was more likely reported that this lawsuit served as a threat against the press freedoms in this country. Clearly, the media's need to be free to defame people at will, with no expectation of being called out for reckless journalism.
Fitzpatrick, all the while, maintained her integrity, and then ramped up her charges. She was verbally spiking the football on a podcast at The Atlantic, insisting that since her publication of the claims, she has been receiving a flood of comments from others confirming her reporting. And in keeping with the quality of her work, still not a single person is on the record.
Followup interview in The Atlantic with author of the piece on Patel, Sarah Fitzpatrick: "Since publishing the story, [she] has been “inundated” w/ sources corroborating her reporting:" “I stand by every single word of this report.”https://t.co/HJu2QohfvW
— Harry Litman (@harrylitman) April 23, 2026
So, we are allegedly now up to dozens of people reporting on Patel’s drinking being a blatant problem, and not a single piece of verifiable evidence has been shown that amounts to anything concrete. Nobody has put their name on a report? No documented incidents have been logged? With all the claims of Patel supposedly partying to excess while off-hours, there have been no cellphone images captured anywhere?
This does not measure up; the sheer force of claimed testimonials would indicate that, at some point, actual proof would emerge. Instead, it remains as secondhand gossip, from unverified individuals. And now, the desperation gets worse.
At The Intercept, they claim to have found “new” evidence of Patel’s drinking history. Do not get excited. This is on par with ordering a Mint Julep and being served generic bourbon from a plastic bottle, with toothpaste for “flavor.” Trevor Aaronson reportedly has the details of Patel being arrested once for public intoxication, and another police incident involving public urination.
Now, if this got your blood heated, please be calmed. These incidents took place over 20 years ago. And Aaronson peacocking over having unearthed something scalding is also rather tepid. He found these episodes courtesy of…Kash Patel himself. Both of these legal scrapes were revealed in a letter of disclosure that Patel filed with the Florida bar in 2005.
FBI Director Kash Patel disclosed in a 2005 letter that he'd been arrested for public urination. He also described a public intoxication arrest in 2001.
— Trevor Aaronson (@trevoraaronson) April 24, 2026
These details come as Patel faces scrutiny over alcohol use.
My story in @theintercept. https://t.co/scwLtwy0Tb
Allow me to grasp the significance from Trevor here. We are supposed to be impacted over a pair of involvements that took place over two decades ago, when Patel was in college?! If Trevor thinks revealing a frat guy was involved in drinking incidents is some sort of breaking news, I will just go ahead and be embarrassed on his behalf. Frankly, I’d be more concerned to learn Patel never had a drop of alcohol while at university.
As Erica Knight, an FBI communications figure, has noted, Patel previously had his emails hacked during the Biden years, and he was also targeted in the Arctic Frost investigations, instigated by Jack Smith. Then you have him going through the crucible of a Senate confirmation hearing. Yet after all of those invasive explorations, the most damning evidence found on him is in a letter he filed himself, decades ago, that has been available all this time.
It is under these withering claims that the press and the Democrats are bellowing that Patel needs to be removed from his position as head of the FBI.
NEW: A top White House official tells me that Kash Patel is likely the next Cabinet-level official to go.
— Dasha Burns (@DashaBurns) April 25, 2026
“It’s only a matter of time,” the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter, told me.
There are several reasons, the official said, but top among… pic.twitter.com/FUKftCuZNg
NEW: A top White House official tells me that Kash Patel is likely the next Cabinet-level official to go.
“It’s only a matter of time,” the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter, told me.
There are several reasons, the official said, but top among them is the number of negative stories centered on Patel is “not a good look for a Cabinet secretary,” and Trump is fed up with the level of distraction.
More in @playbookdc
Let that detail sink in. The nation’s top cop needs to be eliminated based on evidence that all would be tossed out of court. The storyline is the administration wants him gone based on all the smoke the press has created, which has so far been shown to be clouds from a fog machine. It is pure wishcasting from a press corps that has shown they know this is a manufactured “scandal.”
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.







Join the conversation as a VIP Member