AI Is Gutting Paychecks - Gen Z Workers Have Declared War

The first measurable hit from workplace AI may already be landing in workers’ paychecks.

A new Apollo Global Management analysis of 321 occupations found that real wage growth in jobs with high AI exposure lagged by 6.7 percentage points after 2023, while employment showed no statistically significant decline, suggesting companies are capturing productivity gains through weaker wages rather than cutting headcount.

Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok summarized the findings:

“Workers in AI-exposed occupations are experiencing slower wage growth, while employment levels in these occupations remain unchanged.”

The model paired Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2015 through 2025 with Anthropic's Economic Index, which tracks actual Claude usage across occupations, then compared wage and employment changes in highly exposed jobs against less-exposed ones.

The damage was concentrated at the bottom. The lowest wage quartile saw a 10.7-point decline in real wage growth; the second quartile fell 5.4 points, the third four points. The highest-paid workers showed no significant effect. Service occupations posted a 24.3-point decline, though from a small sample.

Some of the raw occupational numbers were already ugly. From 2022 to 2024, real wages fell 6.1 percent for computer programmers, 5.4 percent for statistical assistants, 2.9 percent for software quality assurance analysts and testers, and 2.7 percent for database architects. Apollo estimates roughly 5.8 million U.S. workers currently hold highly exposed jobs.

The study has limits. Apollo matched 321 of roughly 800 BLS occupations, and its exposure measure is based only on observed use of Anthropic’s Claude. Industry changes unrelated to AI can also move wages sharply. Broadcasters, announcers, and radio DJs, for example, suffered a 52 percent real-wage drop despite receiving a relatively low AI-exposure score. Apollo’s findings are an early warning, not a final accounting of AI’s effect on pay.

Employees appear to have received the warning anyway.

When AI at the Workplace Is As Dangerous As DEI

An April survey from AI company Writer and research firm Workplace Intelligence found that 29 percent of employees admitted pushing back against their company's AI strategy, and among Gen Z workers, the share reached 44 percent. The resistance took concrete forms: refusing to use mandated systems, flagging security risks by deliberately routing work through unapproved tools, and declining to clean up AI-generated output that wasn't good enough to stand on its own.

Nearly half of the youngest workers in the American workforce looked at what the data confirms is happening to their paychecks and decided the answer was no. That's not entitlement. It's the same instinct driving the right-populist pushback against data centers and Big Tech consolidation. The survey respondents were already using AI at work, so this isn't ignorance of the technology. Of those who pushed back, 30 percent cited fear of automation, 28 percent pointed to security problems, and 20 percent said AI was adding work without adding pay.

Management’s response was equally revealing. Sixty percent of executives said they plan to lay off employees who cannot or will not use AI, and 77 percent said workers who refuse to become AI-proficient will not be considered for promotions or leadership roles. At the same time, 75 percent acknowledged that their company’s AI strategy was “more for show” than useful internal guidance. Only 29 percent reported seeing significant returns from generative AI.

Writer CEO May Habib criticized companies reaching for layoffs instead of reorganizing how work gets done: “Layoffs are not a viable AI strategy. ... AI transformation is ultimately about people.”

Sixty percent of the executives in her company’s survey said they plan to use that strategy anyway.

Workers are being ordered to adopt tools that may erode their negotiating position, while resistance can cost them a promotion or a job. AI super-users were three times more likely to have received both a promotion and a raise in the past year, and reported saving nearly nine hours a week, versus two hours for slower adopters.

Workplace Intelligence Managing Partner Dan Schawbel said that divide is already widening, according to the Writer/Workplace Intelligence survey: “This is a defining moment in AI adoption, and the gap between super-users and laggards is widening fast.”

Apollo has not proved that every AI tool cuts pay, and Writer is an AI vendor with an obvious stake in how companies manage adoption. Together, however, the two reports help explain why workplace resistance is spreading beyond the office technophobe. The same corporate class that spent years advertising its commitment to workers is now quietly pocketing the productivity gains while handing employees an ultimatum: adopt the tool that's shrinking your paycheck, or lose your job. The paycheck may be absorbing AI's first shock, and management has already decided who will be blamed for getting in the way.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.