Markets Shrug As Iran Shuts Hormuz, but Energy Risk Is Still Real

Iran’s temporary partial shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz this week did not spark an oil rally. Prices actually moved lower. But the calm market reaction should not obscure the underlying reality: A single chokepoint still carries enormous leverage over global energy flows, and that has consequences for American consumers.

Tehran partially closed the strategically vital waterway during live firing naval drills conducted by the Revolutionary Guard, citing security precautions.

The move coincided with indirect nuclear talks between the United States and Iran in Geneva that ended without a deal, though officials referenced agreement on “guiding principles” and said negotiations would continue

The scale is the story. As previously reported:

“About 13 million barrels per day of crude oil transited the Strait of Hormuz in 2025, accounting for roughly 31% of global seaborne crude flows.”

Nearly one-third of the world’s seaborne crude moves through that narrow passage. That is not a side note. It is a structural vulnerability.

Shipping groups downplayed the disruption. One industry official explained:

“The temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz was likely to cause ‘minor nuisance and delays’ to inbound shipping headed for the Persian Gulf — but no major disruptions.”

Markets agreed. Brent crude fell 1.8 percent to $67.48 per barrel, and West Texas Intermediate slipped 0.4 percent to $62.65. Traders treated the move as signaling, not supply shock.

New Development: Iran Diplomat Signals Nuclear Talks If US Eases Sanctions

The diplomatic context remains unresolved.

“Iran temporarily partially closed the vital Strait of Hormuz for Revolutionary Guards military drills Tuesday as indirect nuclear talks with the United States wrapped up in Geneva without a deal but with agreement on guiding principles.”

Talks continue. Tensions continue. The leverage remains.

Here is the part that matters for U.S. policy.

Oil trades on global benchmarks. When risk rises in the Persian Gulf, pricing reflects it everywhere. That filters into fuel costs, transportation expenses, and inflation expectations. American drivers do not need a tanker delayed in the Strait of Hormuz to feel the effects. They need only a futures market that prices in geopolitical risk.

This was the first such Strait measure since U.S. threats of military action in January, unfolding amid heightened regional positioning. Even described as a readiness and deterrence drill, the timing during active negotiations underscores that energy transit routes are part of the strategic chessboard.

For Washington, the takeaway is simple. Domestic production, refining capacity, pipeline infrastructure, and strategic reserves are hedges against chokepoint leverage. The more resilient U.S. supply becomes, the less pricing power hostile actors gain from demonstrations in narrow waterways.

Markets may have shrugged.

The chokepoint still exists.

As long as nearly one-third of global seaborne crude moves through that corridor, American consumers remain exposed to Middle East volatility. That is not alarmism. It is arithmetic

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump and his administration’s bold leadership, we are respected on the world stage, and our enemies are being put on notice.

Help us continue to report on the administration’s peace through strength foreign policy and its successes. Join RedState and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.