Brooke Rollins Goes Full 'Find Out' on USDA Attorney Over Alleged Celebration of Charlie Kirk's Murder

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File

In the aftermath of the assassination of conservative leader Charlie Kirk on September 10th, we saw some truly depraved reactions from many on the left, including members of Congress, some in higher ed and the public school system, and in local Democrat Party chapters.

Advertisement

Others included healthcare workers and rank-and-file members of the working class who strangely didn't think about what kind of consequences they could face from their employers for openly expressing joy on social media platforms like TikTok and X over Kirk's murder.

Among them was now-former Carolina Panthers communications coordinator Charlie Rock, who on Instagram posted an image of Kirk with a note above the image that read, “Why are yall sad? Your man said it was worth it." Also included was a snippet of the Wu-Tang Clan song “Protect Ya Neck,” further evidence that Rock was mocking Kirk for getting shot in the neck.


READ MORE: Carolina Panthers Take Swift Action for a Change After Employee Allegedly Cheered Charlie Kirk's Murder


In recent days, another woke leftist found out the hard way that, at the very least, it's best if you keep such thoughts to yourself unless you want to flush your career down the toilet.

The woman's name is Ashley Jamieson, and up until Monday, she worked as a litigation attorney for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Her dismissal happened after screengrabs circulated on social media that appeared to show Jamieson allegedly not only cheering Kirk's death and referencing his children but also seeming to agree with another X user that more conservatives should suffer a similar fate:

Advertisement

On Friday, in response to another post from Libs of TikTok, USDA Sec. Brooke Rollins confirmed Jamieson would soon be on her way out the door:

Not surprisingly, Ms. Jamieson is playing the victim, denying she ever made light of Kirk's death and claiming without evidence that she was doxxed for defending another government worker whom she says was also doxxed. She also managed to throw in the "white supremacy" card for good measure, proclaiming she was targeted primarily because she was a black woman:

Strangely, though she stated she did not make light of Kirk's death, in another tweet, she is accusing the Trump administration of stifling dissent. But... if she didn't say the things that she's alleged to have said, how could this supposedly be about "stifling dissent"? Were they "stifling dissent" over something else she allegedly said? I'm so confused.

Advertisement

Presumably, at some point, this will become a legal matter, as Ms. Jamieson indicated in another tweet that she would be saying nothing more about this online pending the "next steps."  While it's unclear what those "steps" might be, one wonders if they will involve a scrubbing of her X account of other alleged fantasies regarding conservative deaths, assuming that hasn't been done already.

As always, stay tuned.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the woke left and corporate media? Please support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos