Mom of Loudoun County Rapist Disgustingly Blames Victim, Defends Son's '15-Year-Old Hormones'

AP Photo/Cliff Owen

Warning: This article is going to set your hair on fire. Don’t say I didn’t warn you. OK, here we go.

The Loudoun County, Virginia, mother of the skirt-wearing teenager accused of raping a female classmate in a girls’ bathroom is now speaking out in defense of her son. Not the normal defense we might expect from a mother who loves her son — not even close. The woman not only despicably said her transgender son simply wanted sex; she blamed the 15-year old girl for being old enough to defend herself.

Before we continue with this disgusting article, keep in mind that a judge in October found the unnamed teen guilty of rape in the assault of the girl in May.

Yeah, well, judge, that’s not how Mommy Dearest saw it. (Emphasis, mine.)

“He’s a 15-year-old boy that wanted to have sex in the bathroom, with somebody that was willing. And they’re twisting this just enough to make it a political hot button issue.”

See what I mean? It gets worse. Far worse. 

The mother also addressed the notion about whether or not her son is trans, bi-, or whatever the hell:

“He would wear a skirt one day and then the next day, he would wear jeans and a T-shirt, a polo, or hoodie. He was trying to find himself and that involved all kinds of styles. I believe he was doing it because it gave him attention he desperately needed and sought.”

The woman said her son wore a skirt that day because he has an “androgynous style.”

You know, what “normal” boy in search of himself doesn’t think it’s an awesome idea to rape a 15-year-old girl in a girl’s bathroom at school — right, mom? Ah, but Mommy Dearest said her son was worried about the girl he had just raped and sodomized.

“He was worried about her, asked her how she was feeling, touched her forehead, brought water for her. He’d mentioned something about hooking up with her, said they’d discussed it that day and that she was wishy-washy, was like, ‘Yeah, maybe, I still don’t feel well, we’ll see.”

The delusional woman said her son “depicted the rape as an accident” and said that he didn’t mean to insert himself into her anus.

“He said he was intending for vaginal and it ended up for 10 seconds as anal. He knew she was in pain. He said, ‘Are you okay?” She said that hurt. And he’s like, ‘What kind of pain?'”

The woman maintained her son “was showing genuine concern.”

Washington Examiner’s Tiana Lowe in a Twitter thread about the mother’s defense of her son said “this is what all rape apologists do.”

Loudoun County rapist’s mother: It was an ‘accident’ and a real victim wouldn’t ‘sit there and take it’ Read this, and you’ll understand just how so much went so wrong in so little time. Absent father, bad mother, and a walking red flag for a son.

Loudoun County (convicted) rapist’s mother: “If I was in a position where I was about to be raped, I would be screaming, kicking, everything. You’re 15. You can reasonably defend yourself. You’re not just going to sit there and take it.”

This is what all rape apologists do: blame the victim. She didn’t fight back hard enough, she wanted it, her skirt was too short, etc. But we ALL know the onus is on the perpetrator to simply not rape!

Loudoun County rapist’s mom: “He said he was intending for vaginal and it ended up for 10 seconds as anal.” Sorry, but the Virgin Mary herself knows that a man does not accidentally put his d*** in an anus, especially when we’re talking about 15-year-olds.

Two of Lowe’s tweets:

Spot-on, including the mother disgustingly blaming the girl:

“If I was in a position where I was about to be raped, I would be screaming, kicking, everything,” she said. “You’re 15. You can reasonably defend yourself.

You’re not just going to sit there and take it. And so, because there wasn’t a presence of a fight, he felt it was okay to keep going.”

According to The Daily Mail, the boy “has a checkered record when it comes to sexual indiscretions,” and in fifth grade, reportedly sent nude photos of himself to a female classmate. The girl’s parents reportedly agreed not to file charges in exchange for the school district keeping the boy away from their daughter.

Mommy Dearest confirmed the incident happened, said Daily Mail. And her response? She snapped:

“What the f**k does that have to do with anything?”

Inexcusably, the woman even tossed in a bit of feeling sorry for herself, in addition to worrying about how the incident is going to affect her son in the future.

“What are they trying to do? Did they hire an investigator to dig up everything and ruin him for the rest of his life? He’s been a challenging child his whole life, which I’ve dealt with myself.

“My son’s gone through multiple forms of counseling and therapy, resources here, at school, friends, family. It’s been 15 years of hell trying to get him to do better and be better.”

Finally, the despicable woman whined about authorities not allowing her to hear her “son’s side.”

“I didn’t hear my son’s side of it because he was being hauled into [juvenile detention] before I could talk to him. What is the end game on this?

“My son’s going to be on the sexual registry and be committed to Megan’s Law for the rest of his life because he had 15-year-old hormones.”

As we reported at the time, the infamous Loudoun County school board — and the equally contemptible “mainstream” media — attempted to cover up and minimize the entire disgusting incident.

Here are several of our reports:

Loudoun County Gives Disgusting Response to Alleged Cover-up of Rape Involving Transgender Policies

Parents Come out in Force: Demand Loudoun County School Superintendent Resign for Alleged Rape Cover-Up

Washington Post Turns to Victim Shaming of a Minor to Preserve Narrative in Loudoun County School Rape Case