Virginia voters cast their ballots on April 21 on the question of the Democrats' gerrymandering scheme, and the “yes” side narrowly prevailed – by 3 points – after outspending the “no” side by greater than 3-to-1. Since then, the advocates have repeatedly harped that “the people have spoken,” as if that somehow settles the matter.
It doesn’t.
Because in Virginia, as in every constitutional republic, the Constitution, not a single election result, has the final say. And Virginia’s Democrat General Assembly trampled Virginia’s Constitution in its TDS stampede to take Virginia’s congressional map from among the most balanced in the country, to one of the most extreme.
That has caused some legal whiplash … to the Democrats.
That reality came into sharper focus last week when the Virginia Supreme Court refused to lift the injunction blocking certification of the referendum. If the justices believed this process was clearly on solid constitutional footing, they could have let certification proceed. They didn’t.
That qualifies as a ‘tea leaf.’
Now, let’s dispense with the spin. The LEGAL case isn’t about partisan advantage or which set of congressional maps someone prefers. It’s about whether the General Assembly followed the rules required to amend Virginia’s Constitution in the first place.
And those rules aren’t suggestions. They’re guardrails, designed to prevent exactly what happened here: a rushed, mid-election power play to rewrite the system in favor of those in power.
Start with the basics. To amend Virginia’s Constitution, lawmakers have to pass a proposal twice, with an intervening election in between. That intervening election isn’t a technicality, it plays a critical role in the amendment process. It gives voters a chance to weigh in on the people making the final call.
That didn’t happen here. Not in any meaningful sense.
The General Assembly didn’t push through its first passage until October 31, 2025 (fittingly on Halloween), right in the middle of a 45-day election that had been underway since September 19, 2025. More than one million Virginians had already voted by Halloween.
So, let’s be honest about what that means.
Over a million voters cast ballots without knowing that the redistricting system they had overwhelmingly approved just five years earlier was about to be dismantled. That’s not a minor glitch. That’s a direct blow to the integrity of the process.
And it gets worse.
The amendment was jammed through a special legislative session that wasn’t even called for that purpose. Then the Virginia Dems went on to try and side-step the Virginia Constitution’s requirement that no referendum take place until more than 90 days after the second passage of the proposed amendment – which happened on January 16, 2026. Given that ‘election day’ was April 21st, voting began on March 6, 2026. You don’t need to be very good at math to know that March 6th is not 90 days after January 16th.
These aren’t gray areas. These are basic requirements written to prevent exactly this kind of last-minute maneuver.
Then there’s the argument we’ve heard non-stop since the vote: “the people have spoken.”
Really? Does that override multiple violations of Virginia’s laws and its Constitution?
Because when the justices asked a simple question during oral argument, whether the outcome of the vote had any bearing on the constitutional issues before the Court, the answer from the state’s own lawyer was just as simple: no.
In one word, Virginia’s current Attorney General, the infamous Jay Jones, had the rug pulled out from under him … by his own lawyer!
DIVE DEEPER
Dems Called Out by VA Supreme Court Justices Over Brazen Gerrymander Power Grab
The Virginia Supreme Court Just Dropped a One-Sentence Hammer on Dems' Gerrymander Scheme
A vote doesn’t cure a constitutional violation. It doesn’t override the rules that govern how that vote came to be. If the process was unconstitutional, the result is void, period.
There’s also a bit of irony here that’s hard to ignore.
For years, the Dems have been telling us that early voting is sacrosanct, beyond criticism, beyond question. But when early voting got in the way of this particular power grab, the message suddenly changed: vote early at your own risk.
One of the plaintiffs in this case is a Democrat voter who supported the bipartisan redistricting system voters approved by a two-to-one margin in 2020. She had no idea her own representative was preparing to undo it mid-election. Had she known, she says she would have voted differently.
That’s not a hypothetical problem. That’s a real voter who was effectively kept in the dark.
And it’s exactly why Virginia’s Constitution imposes structure and timing on the amendment process.
The Virginia Supreme Court seems to understand the stakes. It has already moved with unusual speed, briefs filed within days, oral argument held almost immediately. And with good reason.
As of May 1, congressional district committee chairs begin receiving candidate filings. The Court knows that uncertainty over whether this referendum, and any maps that follow from it, are even valid cannot drag on.
A decision is coming. And it’s coming soon.
Here’s what that decision will determine.
If the Court finds the amendment process violated the Constitution, the referendum result is nullified. If the process survives but the maps fail constitutional scrutiny, they’ll have to be redrawn. And if everything is upheld, the political consequences will be significant.
But all of that hinges on one simple question:
Did the Democrat General Assembly follow the Constitution and laws of Virginia?
That’s the question before the Court, not whether one side won a close vote, not whether the outcome is politically convenient, but whether the rules were followed.
The votes were cast.
Now the Constitution gets its say.
Editor’s Note: Republicans are fighting for election integrity by requiring proper identification to vote.
Help us continue to report why Democrats oppose such obvious measures by joining RedState VIP and using promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member