There is corruption. Then there is smiling politely while telling students that masculinity is a problem and billing the school district for it.
Welcome to California.
A report out of the New York Post pulls the curtain back on a cozy little arrangement involving California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom—or, as the governor prefers to call her, the state’s “First Partner.” Cute title. Less cute once you see the money trail.
Gavin Newsom's wife pushed weird gender films into California classrooms - while paying herself a fortune https://t.co/0u5DwCMYXu pic.twitter.com/zuWxwwejvn
— New York Post (@nypost) March 9, 2026
Siebel Newsom runs a nonprofit called The Representation Project. Its mission sounds harmless enough. Promote healthy gender roles. Encourage positive cultural change. The usual buzzword salad that fills grant applications.
But the organization does something else too. It licenses films to schools across the country. Thousands of them. And those films just happen to be produced by Siebel Newsom herself.
One of the documentaries is called The Mask You Live In. The premise? Middle school boys are being damaged by society’s expectations of masculinity. The real problem, apparently, is that boys are encouraged to be strong, competitive, or emotionally restrained.
You know. The traits that built civilization.
According to the organization’s own 2021 impact report, more than 5,000 schools across all 50 states have shown these films. That means 2.8 million students have sat through this ideological lecture. And the money is not small.
The Representation Project has pulled in more than $3 million in film sales and screenings. IRS filings show Siebel Newsom drawing a $150,000 salary, plus reimbursements that can reach another $150,000 annually.
So let’s pause for a moment. The governor’s wife makes films about gender ideology. Her nonprofit licenses those films to schools. And then the state government begins recommending those same films in education guidance. Anyone else getting this?
After Gavin Newsom became governor, California’s Board of Education and Department of Education started officially recommending the films in their educational materials. If that sounds like a conflict of interest, congratulations. You are paying attention.
Oh, but wait, there's more.
The Office of the First Partner actively pushed to get the films into low-performing schools. Because when students are struggling with reading and math, the obvious solution is a seminar on privilege and toxic masculinity. Forget phonics. Let’s get hooked on a feeling.
The irony here is thick enough to cut with a knife. California schools are collapsing academically. According to recent state assessments, large percentages of students cannot read or do math at grade level. But leadership priorities remain crystal clear. Fix masculinity.
No wonder no one in the state can solve for x or y.
The financial setup is even more remarkable once you see where these films are produced. Siebel Newsom’s for-profit company, Girls Club, produces them from the couple’s $9 million estate in Kentfield, California.
So the pipeline looks something like this.
- Films are produced at a multimillion-dollar mansion.
- The nonprofit licenses them to schools.
- The state government recommends them.
- Students watch them.
- And the First Partner gets paid.
All of it wrapped in the moral language of empowerment.
Now, to be fair, some defenders will say the screenings are voluntary. No one is forcing schools to buy them.
Maybe so. But when the state education bureaucracy recommends a program, that recommendation carries weight. District administrators listen. Teachers listen. Grant programs listen.
Government nudges are rarely neutral. But the bigger question here is not just California. Imagine a future with an expanded reach of this nonsense.
Gavin Newsom has been positioning himself for national relevance for years. He has the donor network, the media friends, and the ambition. He also has a political brand built around exporting California’s cultural model to the rest of the country.
If this is how things operate at the state level, imagine the scale if that mindset reached Washington. Imagine federal education departments recommending ideological films tied to the president’s family business. It sounds ridiculous, but five years ago, most people would have laughed if you told them public schools would spend class time debating whether boys should even act like boys. Tell that to my sons, who spent last night catching bullfrogs in a pond barehanded.
Yet, here we are.
The ideology is bad enough. The conflicts of interest are worse. But the most revealing part is the assumption behind it all. The assumption that government power exists to reshape culture first and educate children second.
Parents are finally waking up to it. They feel it. That is why school board meetings across the country look like courtroom scenes from SVU. Moms and dads are tired of watching classrooms turn into laboratories for elite social theories.
They want their kids to read well. Write clearly. Think critically. They do not want their sons told that masculinity itself is the problem. If Gavin Newsom ever decides to take his political show national, voters might want to remember this little arrangement back home.
Because when politicians talk about “representation,” it is usually not your kids they are representing.
It is themselves.
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member