Have you noticed the Fortnight Foibles seen in the media services in recent months? It has become a pattern in the desire to bring down President Trump that a news item will be THE most important issue in the press, reported with intensity, only to be dropped blithely in service to the next big issue promised to impact his leadership.
For a time, recall, we were supposed to be outraged that Trump was supposedly razing the White House for his Ballroom. That gave way to the Schumer Shutdown hysteria. When the government reopened, and the neutered Dems looked inept, almost instantly, the Jeffrey Epstein emails reared up and were said to be the demise of Trump. Then Congress voted to release the Epstein Files, and nothing happened, so the Sedition-6 released their video and occupied the press for a spell, until their claims of illegality in the military were dispelled by their inability to note any specific instances.
Now it has segued to accusing Secretary Pete Hegseth of ordering a “double-tap” strike on a Venezuelan drug runner watercraft, where survivors were seen, and he supposedly called for a follow-up strike to take them out. Now the press is convinced they have Hegseth dead to rights, with their overcaffeinated talk of murder, war crimes, Nuremberg Trials, and his being sent to The Hague.
READ MORE: Washington Post Accuses Pete Hegseth of 'Illegal Order' to Kill Drug Runners, but Is It Real?
That Narrative About Hegseth and the Strike on the Drug Boats Just Imploded Even More
We are on the verge of this latest news cycle spinning into irrelevance. The desperation is telling as the very storyline they have been pushing is about to completely unravel. One indicator that a narrative is falling apart is when the language changes to contort around the uncomfortable introduction of facts.
Case in point: We see the ocean-borne version of “Maryland Man” being employed, as the press is attempting to recast these targets as innocent fishermen being targeted by our military. ("Fishermen" with Mercury quad-outboards at full throttle, carving the ocean at 40 knots without angling gear.) We need to laugh along as Rachel Maddow tries to sell this fable, insisting that we see an administration that is inventing a war strictly so it can then randomly deport people from Venezuela.
You can practically see tinfoil on @Maddow’s head as she uncorks this Blue-anon theory for drug boat attacks.
— Lie-Able Sources (@LieAbleSources) December 5, 2025
She unspools a conspiracy that Trump wants to arbitrarily deport Venezuelans, so he invented a war to justify their expulsion?
This is proof that they lost the script. pic.twitter.com/s3EyDSQVz7
If, like me, you are curious why the administration wants to specifically deport all Venezuelans, sadly, you will not find an explanation. This is because, in wanting to explain her conspiracy theory, Maddow resorts to a conspiracy theory to do so. She needs to deny that drugs are being shipped, so she concocts another reason for the attacks and cooks up her own rationale that is devoid of rational thinking.
But there is another reason this media narrative is collapsing, and it is of their own making. The press has focused entirely on the details of this September boat attack (dare we say “pounced” or “seized”?), and in so doing, trapped themselves. By insisting to us that this was a double-tap strike, they say this violated international law, that any survivors should have been captured and granted due process. However, they have dredged up a problem, and it goes back to their favored leader, Barack Obama.
While revisionists love to look back and claim he was among our most peaceful leaders, President Obama was actually well known for one international policy – drone strikes. This was a preferred method of engagement for his term, as it allowed him to say that he avoided conflicts with boots on the ground. It couched his leadership as a peaceful enterprise, all while he was actively hitting enemy targets, and did so while compiling his share of civilians eliminated as collateral damage. But more than using drones, Obama also used the double-tap method, and in a more severe and offensive manner.
The Hegseth controversy that the press is desperate to create involved a second strike that took place within moments of the same mission. The call made by Admiral Frank M. “Mitch” Bradley to hit the target again was made while looking at the footage in real time and determining that the watercraft was not sufficiently immobilized. The Barack Obama double-tap method was entirely different.
In those attacks, the second strike from drones would occur after first responders and/or civilians in the area were on the scene, becoming casualties as the follow-up hit was executed. By comparison, those secondary hits are far more egregious.
In the drug boat instances, we see orders to take out the boat and the occupants, yet in the use of a secondary strike on the very same human targets, we are supposed to become outraged. In the Obama examples, there were multiple instances where hostiles were initially engaged, but the secondary strikes occurred after locals had descended onto the impact area for rescue and recovery. There were even instances where Obama-era attacks reportedly would hit funerals where other terror targets convened, and also took out collateral citizens
While reported at the time, the Obama double-tap events rarely rose to a level of war crime accusations. While select outlets or individuals may have voiced a concern, there was not the chorus of news outlets promoting this idea like we have been hearing this week. So we have to believe Hegseth and the administration are culpable of murder when a second hit eliminated the intended targets, but Obama’s secondary attacks that involved residents of a region do not rise to this level of criminality?
Already, we have fissures forming in the original reporting, as the Washington Post story that “broke” this detail has been contested by a New York Times follow-up that has dispelled many of the contentions put forth by WaPo in its claim. Normally, in the effort to hit President Trump, outlets will independently corroborate a story to entrench its validity. To see the Times take that contrarian position speaks to the flawed reporting.
Now, the “double-tap” language the press preferred is harkening back to the sainted Obama administration and its more grievous tactics in employing this method. This reality will lead to a dawning, and as a result this current outrage is sure to subside. As this current news cycle is about to become distaff, we can look forward to Monday, when the next fortnight of outrage is certain to begin percolating.
Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.
Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member