California's Coastal Commission has formally apologized to Elon Musk — and not just in a press statement, or off the record. This is a signed, court-enforceable federal settlement.
At an October 2024 hearing on SpaceX's Falcon 9 launch program at Vandenberg Space Force Base, commissioners voted to block a U.S. Air Force proposal to expand the launch schedule and were explicit about why.
Chairwoman Caryl Hart declared Musk had "aggressively injected himself into the presidential race and made it clear what his point of view is," while Commissioner Gretchen Newsom accused him of "hopping about the country, spewing and tweeting political falsehoods, and attacking FEMA.” At the time, Musk had been providing free Starlink internet access to hurricane victims in areas FEMA had struggled to reach.
Those were not stray comments. They were the stated reasoning of government regulators immediately before casting their votes.
SpaceX sued, alleging the Commission violated the U.S. Constitution, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and the California Coastal Act by rejecting a federal proposal based on hostility to Musk’s politics rather than regulatory criteria. The U.S. Air Force did not wait for the courts to weigh in and instead invoked its federal authority to proceed with the expanded launch schedule over the Commission's objection, a blunt assertion of federal jurisdiction.
The settlement was unsealed on April 28, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. California Attorney General Rob Bonta signed off on April 16.
The apology in the agreement is unambiguous.
"The Commission acknowledges that Commissioners made statements, including during their October 10, 2024, hearing on the Base's Falcon 9 launch program, that showed political bias against SpaceX and its Chief Executive Officer and were improper. The Commission apologizes for those statements."
Paired with that language is a binding restriction. The Commission "specifically agrees that it will not take into account the perceived political beliefs, political speech, or labor practices of SpaceX or its officers" in any regulatory action going forward, making that limitation explicit and enforceable.
The permitting concession is equally significant. The Commission is barred in perpetuity from requiring a Coastal Development Permit for SpaceX's launch operations at Vandenberg's Space Launch Complexes 4 and 6 under federal Coastal Zone Management Act determinations. It retains only limited authority over certain off-base activities such as beach closures. Both parties bear their own legal costs, and the agreement includes a standard no-admission-of-liability clause that does not change the substance of the outcome.
Read More: SpaceX IPO Could Make Elon Musk the First Trillionaire
Elon Musk Is Moving Fast Because the US Chip System Is Broken
No judge compelled the apology. The Commission negotiated it voluntarily.
The lawsuit alleged the Commission's actions violated the First Amendment by factoring Musk's political speech into regulatory decisions, and the commissioners' own statements provided the evidentiary record supporting that claim. In this case, those statements are now reflected directly in the settlement itself.
The law applies to regulators, too. Officials who treat their mandate as a tool for punishing political opponents eventually produce exactly the kind of record that ends with a formal apology in federal court.
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member