Seems Like a Good Idea - Department of Agriculture Moving Closer to Agriculture

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File

Decentralizing the federal government had been a talking point in conservative circles for some time. Now it looks like this is getting underway.

On Friday, the Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, announced something that Washington is actually doing something that makes sense - sending the Department of Agriculture out to places where, you know, agriculture happens. It's an idea that's long overdue.

Advertisement

Secretary Rollins said:

From the beginning, he (President Trump) talked about draining the swamp, and I know you, Bill, remember this very well. For those of us out in America at the time, we didn't all know what he really meant. Now, here we are, fast forward 10 years later, and this is literally what he has tasked his cabinet to do: To deconstruct the administrative state in Washington, DC. This is aligned with our Founding Fathers' vision, of over 250 years ago, where the government should be closer to the people. But under Republicans and Democrats, all these years, the coalescing of power in Washington, DC, has just gone on and on and on, but no more. 

So yesterday, USDA announced we're going to be moving most of our headquarters staff out into the country, in the five cities, the five states that you mentioned, taking our, getting closer to our constituents, the farmers, the ranchers, the producers, the firefighters, USDA has the largest firefighting contingency in America. We fight the wildfires out across the west of our country. Our food stamp program, all of the above, ensuring that we're moving out closer to the people of America. And this is what the Founding Fathers envisioned. It will be cheaper, it will be more efficient, and we'll be able to do better.  

Advertisement

Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO), who hails from a state with a huge agricultural sector, was quick to weigh in:

What are the advantages of this move? There are several.


Read More: Let's Be Real: Nobody's Starving Here in the United States.

Who Are Your Neighbors? Chinese Buyers Are Purchasing More Than US Farmland


First: Moving the Department of Agriculture out into the heartland, where agriculture actually takes place, makes a great deal of sense. Very few food crops are grown in the District, after all, and we might suspect that few people with knowledge and experience in growing such crops would be interested in a full-time career job in that city. This places a built-in limit on the value that the Department of Agriculture can provide.

Second: This is the first step in what should be a much larger move. Decentralizing the federal government not only moves the various aspects of that government closer to the people, but it also could serve a national security concern, of not making it so easy for a potential enemy to destroy the entire federal government in one go.

Advertisement

Breaking up the Department of Agriculture, moving it out into the agricultural areas, is an idea whose time has come. Many long-time Washington bureaucrats may not want to make the move; fine. USDA will do fine without them, and in the heartland, they can find new employees who are actually familiar with agriculture.

It's a good start.

Editor's Note: Radical leftist judges are doing everything they can to hamstring President Trump's agenda to make America great again.

Help us hold these corrupt judges accountable for their unconstitutional rulings. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos