New DOJ IG Report: At Least Six Terror Attacks in the Us by Perpetrators Previously Identified by the FBI

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File

The Justice Dept’s Inspector General just released an audit of the FBI’s efforts to identify homegrown violent extremists, Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Efforts to Identify Homegrown Violent Extremists through Counterterrorism Assessments. Here was the objective of the audit:


The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) efforts to identify homegrown violent extremists (HVE) through counterterrorism assessments. Our objectives were to review the FBI’s HVE-related casework and resource management and evaluate its policies and processes to assess HVE threats from October 2012 through September 2018.

Key findings:

Since September 11, 2001, HVEs have carried out over 20 attacks in the United States, some of which occurred after the FBI closed a counterterrorism investigation or assessment on the individual.

We further found that the FBI has experienced a substantial influx of reports of suspicious incidents, but has not developed comprehensive strategies for addressing t he challenges associated with the potential cross-over between terrorist threats and other categories of threats, for example, those posed by individuals with mental health issues and crim inal threats to life.

According to the FBI, between January 2015 and December 2018, it arrested 65 individuals who allegedly planned to conduct terrorist attacks in the United States.


Perhaps the most significant finding was that there were at least six attacks by HVEs in the US who were previously identified/investigated by the FBI, including Ft. Hood (2009), the Boston Marathon bombing (2013), and the Orlando Pulse Nightclub attack (2016). These are serious failures that cost American lives. Note the details of each of the six in the graphic in the below tweet:

Most of the recommendation made in the IG report had to do with internal policies, processes and procedures and read like the typical government gobbledygook. Here are a couple of the more easily-decipherable recommendations:

  • Review existing guidance for processing and systematically categorizing, assigning, and assessing threats and suspicious activities in the Guardian system that are related to counterterrorism threat-to-life incidents, and develop any additional policies and procedures required.

  • Develop and implement a comprehensive strategy for assessing and mitigating threats with subjects who have mental health concerns, which incorporates a requirement for field offices to establish a plan to utilize the resources and legal techniques specific to their area of responsibility to address this emerging threat, and deploy a training module to provide subject mitigation techniques when dealing with individuals suffering from mental health problems.


The entire report can be obtained and read at leisure here.

The end.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos