
Earlier today, my colleague Jennifer Van Laar posted on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s vehement denial of a scurrilous and uncorroborated story run by the New Yorker. This would be different than the scurrilous and uncorroborated story run by the Washington Post a week ago.
I have to admit I was heartened to hear Kavanaugh was going to fight and that President Trump is saying he will not pull the nomination because over the weekend the cruise directors in the GOP and the conservative movement were beginning to agree that Kavanaugh had to withdraw because otherwise we might actually have to fight and anger Democrats to get this nominee approved. The fact that Kavanaugh has been cleared for this interview indicates the White House is going to fight this one out to the end:
INBOX: Judge Brett Kavanaugh and his wife, Ashley, sat down for an exclusive interview with @FoxNews' Martha MacCallum. The interview will air tonight at 7 PM. pic.twitter.com/9vQv4pJd5d
— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) September 24, 2018
In a sign that the GOP is beginning to solidify behind the Kavanaugh nomination, Senate Majority Leader “Cocaine” Mitch McConnell went to the floor of the Senate today to excoriate Democrats over their tactics and to express support for Kavanaugh.
Sen. McConnell: "This shameful, shameful smear campaign has hit a new low…Senate Democrats and their allies are trying to destroy a man's personal and professional life on the basis of decades-old allegations that are
unsubstantiated and uncorroborated" https://t.co/CRzeNUqXzA pic.twitter.com/aMEXDjN26Z— ABC News (@ABC) September 24, 2018
McConnell: "This fine nominee to the Supreme Court will receive a vote in this Senate in the near future."
— Kevin Daley đ (@KevinDaleyDC) September 24, 2018
McConnell says: Before the week is out both Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh will be heard under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee – We'll have an up or down vote on Kavanaugh on the Senate floor in the very near future
— Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) September 24, 2018
Actually, the only person in the entire Ford fable who hasn’t given evidence under oath is Christine Ford (here | here).
âITâS DESPICABLE.â McConnell is enraged about the Supreme Court nomination battle, calling it âa choreographed smear campaignâ designed to inflict âmaximum damage at the last minuteâ upon Brett Kavanaugh. pic.twitter.com/RdIcKhsj7m
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) September 24, 2018
As I’ve said several times, McConnell isn’t motivated very much by pubic policy. What he is motivated by is respect. He demands his due as majority leader and if you cross him, he will retaliate. What the Democrats have done here is turn the Kavanaugh hearing into something like playing dwarf-toss in a Florida bar. He doesn’t like that because it reflects on him and it is a blatant lack of respect being shown him.
I don’t know how this plays out, but right now it looks like Kavanaugh will get an up-or-down vote by the Senate.
Full Text
âLet me start with a quote: âI’m going to fight this nomination with everything I’ve got.â That was the Democratic Leader on television mere hours after Judge Brett Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court. Others pledged their opposition before he was even named. Before they’d reviewed a lick of evidence. Before they’d heard a minute of testimony. The Democrats had already made up their minds and chosen their tactics: delay, obstruct, and resist. Whatever it took — whatever the truth really was — they were going to do whatever they could to stop this qualified, experienced, and mainstream nominee.
âDemocrats have signaled for months theyâd put on whatever performance the far-left special interests demanded and throw all the mud they could manufacture. Well, itâs not like they didnât warn us. But even by the far leftâs standards, this shameful smear campaign has hit a new low. Iâll get into the specifics in just a moment. But I want to be perfectly clear about what has taken place.
âSenate Democrats and their allies are trying to destroy a manâs personal and professional life on the basis of decades-old allegations that are unsubstantiated and uncorroborated. That is where we are. This is what the so-called âResistanceâ has become. A smear campaign, pure and simple. Aided and abetted by members of the United States Senate.
âEight weeks ago, Democrats on the Judiciary Committee received a letter from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford with an uncorroborated allegation of misconduct. She had requested the matter be handled discretely and confidentially. The responsible next step would have been alerting the full committee so a confidential, bipartisan investigation could begin. Committee staff would have followed their standard practice for investigating background information. Senators could have questioned Judge Kavanaugh in their meetings, or in closed session, while respecting Dr. Ford’s request for confidentiality.
âBut Democrats didnât do any of that. They sat on Dr. Ford’s letter for seven weeks. They kept it secret. They did nothing. They bid their time. And then they threw Professor Fordâs wishes overboard and leaked it to the press. Our colleague from Delaware has himself indicated that either the Ranking Memberâs office or the Democrat committee staff likely leaked the document. As Iâve noted, we know the chain of custody of the letter went through the Democrat side of the Judiciary Committee.
âSo, does this sound like Democratic Senators take their responsibilities seriously and want to get to the truth? Or does it sound like a choreographed smear campaign that ignored Dr. Ford’s request for confidentiality in order to inflict maximum damage at the last minute on Judge Kavanaugh and his family?
âThis is an allegation of misconduct which all four supposed witnesses either flatly contradict or are unable to back up. In addition to Judge Kavanaugh, the other three supposed witnesses have said they have — quote — âno knowledge,â âno recollection,â and âno memoryâ of the alleged incident. Itâs not just one alleged witness disagreeing with the allegations — itâs literally every person who was supposedly there. One of these supposed witnesses said she does not even know Judge Kavanaugh.
âSo all the witnesses that Dr. Ford says were present at the party have told the Committee — on the record and under penalty of felony — all confirm that they do not remember any such party, do not know Judge Kavanaugh, or have never seen him do anything remotely like what has been alleged. And this unsubstantiated allegation stands entirely at odds with everything weâve heard about Judge Kavanaughâs character from those who have worked with him and socialized with him, dating all the way back to high school.
âBut Democrats wouldnât let a few inconvenient things — like a complete lack of evidence, or an accuserâs request for confidentiality — get between them and a good smear. Itâs despicable. And the contrast with the completely professional conduct of Chairman Grassley could not be starker.
âAs soon as Chairman Grassley learned about this allegation, he handled it through proper channels. He immediately began gathering the facts. His office promptly conducted a transcribed interview of Judge Kavanaugh — in which, under penalty of felony, he unequivocally denied the last-minute allegation. And the office received statements from all the other supposed witnesses that either directly contradicted the story or denied knowing anything about it.
âWhatâs more, Chairman Grassley ensured that Dr. Ford could be heard in a forum of her choosing â either here or in California; either in public or in private; either with the staff or with the Members. He has gone above and beyond to accommodate her requests. Thanks to him, we have a fair and open hearing scheduled for Thursday. Dr. Ford will be able to state her allegation under oath, and Judge Kavanaugh will be able to respond.
âBut the smear campaign didnât stop there. That was just âAct One.â According to the reporter of this second allegation, the accuser, quote, âcame forward because Senate Democrats began looking…â And now theyâre calling for even further delays and further obstruction over a second, decades-old allegation that is so thin and unsupported that the New York Times refused to even run a story about it.
âThis claim is so dubious that the New York Times passed on the story entirely after it looked into it. Hereâs why the New York Times declined to publish. It — quote — âinterviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story and could find no one with firsthand knowledge.â Not one person âwith firsthand knowledgeâ to support the allegation — but rather multiple, on-the-record denials. Again. The Times also reported that the claimant said she, herself, is uncertain of her claim. Thatâs the New York Times, whose credo is âall the news thatâs fit to print.â And it found this latest last-minute allegation not even fit to print.
âBut that hasnât stopped Judiciary Committee Democrats from shoveling it into their smear campaign and demanding for yet further delays. They kept this one secret from Republicans, too, by the way. Evidently, several Democratic offices knew of this allegation for at least a week, but like with Dr. Fordâs claim, they sat on this one, too — so the Committee could not take any proper action. They just wanted it to wind up in the press.
âAnother orchestrated, last-minute hit on the nominee. And now theyâre acting like itâs a legitimate reason to delay things even further. As though they hadnât already announced themselves as completely opposed to his nomination, anyway. As if they hadnât already promised the far left they would lead the fight to bring this nomination down — whatever it took, whatever the cost. Letâs put aside the last-minute, unsubstantiated smears. Letâs return to the facts. Letâs have a fair hearing on Thursday.
âHere are the facts we do have: Hundreds of men and women who have known Brett Kavanaugh across his life have written or spoken out that he is a man of strong character and tremendous integrity. Numerous witnesses testified before the Judiciary Committee that he is a trusted mentor, a loyal friend, and a lifelong champion of women. More than 75 women gathered last week to share their decades-long knowledge of Judge Kavanaugh as a, quote, âresponsible guy who treats us with kindness and respect,â and a âtrue gentleman in all aspects of his life.â
âAnd separately, of course, it remains beyond reasonable dispute that Judge Kavanaughâs legal brilliance and excellence on the bench make him one of the very most qualified Supreme Court nominees in the history of our country. All these facts are quite clearly on one side. Maybe thatâs why the Democrats are so panicked. Maybe thatâs why they are so willing to try to bring down this nominee.
âIn the meantime, a good and honorable man and his family are receiving death threats. They are the subject of smears. And are facing Senate Democrats who say he has no presumption of innocence because they donât agree with his judicial philosophy. Well, before the week is out, both Judge Kavanaugh and Dr. Ford will testify, under oath, before the Judiciary Committee. Chairman Grassley has made sure the facts will be heard. Judge Kavanaugh and the American people deserve nothing less. And I want to make it perfectly clearâJudge Kavanaugh will be voted on here on the Senate floor. Up or down, on the Senate floor, this fine nominee to the Supreme Court will receive a vote in this Senate in the near future.â
=========
=========
Like what you see? Then visit my story archive.
Follow @streiffredstate
I’m on Facebook. Drop by and join the fun there.
=========
=========






Join the conversation as a VIP Member