Kamala Harris Starts a Substack: It's As Bad As You'd Think, and Her Coping With Losing Is Hilarious

Kamala Harris is likely to make another attempt to run for president in 2028.

However, she's already sabotaging herself with what she's revealing in her upcoming book and the moves she's making.

As we reported, she finally admitted that Joe Biden running again was "reckless," and complained about how the Biden team didn't appreciate her. Former Biden officials then shot back, saying she wasn't good at her job.

She also confessed she didn't pick former Biden Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a friend, as her vice presidential running mate because he is gay and thought that was “too big of a risk” for a black woman to run with a gay man.

Way to keep stepping in it, Kamala!

Oh My: Kamala Explains Why She Didn't Pick Pete Buttigieg As Her Running Mate

On Friday, there was another report, according to the AP, about something from her book. She said she didn't realize how bad what she said on "The View" was when she said it.

Asked whether she would have done anything differently than President Joe Biden, Harris replied by saying nothing “comes to mind” and adding that she had “been a part of … most of the decisions that have had impact.”
“I had no idea I’d just pulled the pin on a hand grenade,” Harris wrote in her book, “107 Days,” which is slated for release on Tuesday, according to the AP — “my staff were besides themselves” regarding how she had handed a “gift to the Trump campaign,” she noted, according to the outlet.

How could she not know that? How clueless can you be? I heard it, and I said, "That's it." And truly, it was. That finished her - if she ever even had any chance - when she couldn't articulate anything different. That cluelessness alone should disqualify her; it shows she has no judgment.

That wasn't the only thing showing her poor judgment this week.

Harris has apparently started a Substack. Talk about another bad move. In announcing it, she trips over a couple of things.

First, she puts out formulaic Democratic nonsense that sounds like she's running.

While my new book, 107 Days, focuses on the campaign trail and election, I also write about the state of our country and how we move forward.

What we must understand is that the dismantling of our democracy did not start with the 2024 election. And while there is already a lot… pic.twitter.com/Fj43mL6MSa
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 19, 2025

While my new book, 107 Days, focuses on the campaign trail and election, I also write about the state of our country and how we move forward. What we must understand is that the dismantling of our democracy did not start with the 2024 election. And while there is already a lot of damage done, there is still time to change course — because the power is still with the people. We must be strategic and tactical. Disciplined and bold. We must take to the streets and put forth a vision for the future worth fighting for. The answers will not come out of Washington, DC. They will come from We, the People.

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and yawn.

Although there is one sentence in there, "We must take to the streets and put forth a vision for the future worth fighting for." What exactly is she encouraging here? Remember, it was Kamala during the 2020 BLM riots who encouraged people to donate to a bail fund for people arrested. And once again, she's whipping up the dangerous rhetoric with the "dismantling of democracy." They can't stop with the demonizing and division.

However, the funniest thing in that X post is the graphic. She's pulling a "Hillary Clinton" - she wants us to think that people were regretting their vote for President Donald Trump (rather than her), that they were googling how to change their vote. Then she quotes Gore Vidal, "I told you so" and says she wishes she didn't have to say that. Bad people, bad people! You made her scold you and tell you that she told you so. Is she kidding? I have to admit I find this form of coping hilarious. Again, scolding people is not exactly showing good political instincts.

She had more coping in the Substack piece, which was poorly written, with typos and misused words. Believe me when I say it's not worth your time. I read it, so you don't have to. Here's a sample of how bad it is.

His victory was whisker-thin. He beat me by 1.5 percentage points in one of the closest elections in a century. A third of the electorate voted for me. But a third of the electorate stayed home. That means two-thirds of our country did not elect Donald Trump.
Two-thirds of us did not choose this man or his agenda.

Um, no. That still means more people didn't vote for you. He whipped you even in the popular vote. He won all the swing states. You lost, and lost badly.

She also played the "fascism" card, showing that she's not reading the room about how bad that is.

“This is how fascism begins,” warned Françoise Giroud, a journalist who served in the French Resistance. “It never says its name. It creeps, it floats. When it reaches the tips of people’s noses, they say:
‘Is this it? You think? Don’t exaggerate!’ And then one day it smacks them in the mouth, and it is too late to get rid of it.”
It is not too late for us, but we need to think both strategically and tactically.
When we go to the streets, as we will, we must not give them the spectacle they are craving. We will go out of love of our country and belief in its promise. We cannot let them lie about that.

Oh, please.

In the land of "dumb moves in the run up to 2028," it's a tight fight between this and California Gov. Gavin Newsom's podcast (while failing at being a governor).

Editor's Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about President Trump, his administration, and conservatives.

Help us continue to expose their left-wing bias by reading news you can trust. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.