I checked the Wikipedia entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners a couple of weeks ago when I was writing an article about Hunter Biden and referencing Eric Schwerin, the president of the investment company. Hunter was one of the co-founders of the company. Joe Biden has constantly maintained he knew nothing about his son’s business, but Schwerin acted as something like a business manager, in some respects, over Biden’s affairs, according to the emails on Hunter’s laptop.
As my colleague Mike Miller reported earlier, Schwerin also sat down with Joe Biden at the Obama White House, and visited the White House nearly 20 times — yet another instance of Joe Biden’s claim being proven false.
But, it sounds like another effort to obscure the facts and relationships might be underway in this matter.
That Wikipedia entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners that I had previously been able to check just got deleted earlier this week (Wednesday) — on the basis that it was “not notable,” just as the investigation into Hunter Biden seems to be coming to a head. Talk about an effort to control information. They made clear that it was about stopping “conspiracy” theories about Hunter Biden.
“This organization is only mentioned in connection with its famous founders, Hunter Biden and Christopher Heinz,” said a Wiki editor identified only as Alex, who additionally warned that “keeping it around” ran the risk of the page becoming “a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden.”
Arguments to merge the story with Hunter Biden’s official wikipedia page were also overruled.
The brief article was thin on details and in bad need of an overhaul, but did provide information about the company’s founding by Hunter Biden, Devon Archer and Chris Heinz.
Translation: we don’t want you to know the truth and the relationships. If their entry is honest, how would lead to “conspiracy” theories? The problem of course is the truth. This is the same thing that Twitter and other media did in 2020 to stop people from finding out the truth about the laptop.
— Dr. Nickarama (@nickaramaOG) April 23, 2022
— Dr. Nickarama (@nickaramaOG) April 23, 2022
It’s disturbing that it’s coming from Wikipedia, which is supposed to operate like an encyclopedia but cannot be trusted, according to its cofounder, who calls it “propaganda” for the left-leaning establishment. “There’s a very big, nasty, complex game being played behind the scenes to make the article say what somebody wants them to say,” Sanger has said.
It must be asked: What else might they be deleting, when it comes to Hunter Biden?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member