In his latest act as a moderate Democrat Governor, California's Gavin Newsom vetoed yet another bill that he would have gladly embraced six months ago.
California activists against caste discrimination faced a defeat on Saturday as Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the bill that would add caste to a list of protected categories under the state’s existing anti-discrimination laws.
In a statement, Newsom called the bill “unnecessary”, explaining that California “already prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, and other characteristics, and state law specifies that these civil rights protections shall be liberally construed”.
“Because discrimination based on caste is already prohibited under these existing categories, this bill is unnecessary,” he said in the statement.
The hundreds-year-old caste system divides people based on birth or descent. While caste discrimination has been banned in India for more than 70 years, recent pieces of legislation in the U.S. have pushed it into the spotlight.
Seattle became the first U.S. city to add caste to its anti-discrimination laws earlier this year, and Fresno, Calif., became the second last month. Proponents of making caste a protected class say that it will protect those in the lowest division in the caste system from bias in housing, education and technology sectors.
As RedState exclusively reported, the grounds were majority manufactured by the California Civil Rights Division (CRD) and an activist class who wishes to exist in a colonial bubble of divisiveness rather than embrace the opportunities that exist in a new country and a new era. Milind Makwana was a Dalit American of the supposedly marginalized caste, but he spoke out against SB 403 and strangely and sadly died of a heart attack after speaking to the Cupertino City Council to oppose the bill. Makwana famously described the bill as:
"a disco ball on a Monday morning. If you look at the proposed resolution SB 403, and if you peel off the shiny exterior, what you will find inside is a costume party of hidden racial discrimination and Hinduphobia for Asian-Indians."
WATCH:
I know specifically the CRD, I know from this case [Cisco Corporation], I am against any form of government overreach, whether it's CRD or any other division of the government. The citizen's rights, have to be protected as long as these agencies ensure that everyone is treated equally in front of the law. Everyone is given the same amount of recourse and everyone heard fairly and not gaslighted and labeled. I am perfectly okay with that, right? It needs to be transparent and it needs to show what it's doing because at the end of the day, it is our taxpayers money that is funding these organizations. So, we need to hold these agencies accountable.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member