Thoughts About China Attacking Taiwan...

AP Photo/Chiang Ying-ying, File

I think China will attack Taiwan at some point in the near future. Near future is a relative term, of course, because it could mean anything from next weekend to five years from now. But they are sending all the right signals and doing all the right things to foreshadow their intentions. They want that island badly, and they're probably not going to go away without trying to take it. At least as long as Xi is still breathing.

Advertisement

So, I guess the first question I have is, "Why didn't they do it while Biden was president?" He was weak, probably compromised by Chinese money, and was certainly non compos mentis Seemed like a prime opportunity for them, but I surmise that they simply didn't feel that the time was right. I doubt that they really care who's POTUS because I don't think they have much fear of the US military. Biden may have done nothing, or he may have done something in the event of an attack. Apparently, it didn't matter much to them. Trump will certainly do something, but again, based on their recent activities, they don't care what he'll do either. They have their own plans that will run on their own timetable. And they seem to be full of confidence in their abilities.

What's Holding China Back?

So, at times like this, I cannot help but wonder what's holding them up? Anybody who has read more than two Tom Clancy novels has a little part of themselves that says, "Hey, I can figure this out too!" After all, he got his initiation into the world of spy/military writing by wargaming and reading history books. He didn't have a formal background in military planning, but he talked to people who did, and he had a great mind for figuring stuff out. Well before the end of his life, military experts were coming to him with questions and opinions. I'm certainly not on that level, but I admit I do like to dabble. So before anybody flames me for being a know-nothing armchair quarterback, understand that I realize my experience and knowledge are very limited, but I am willing to learn. 

China is a large country that is obsessed with taking over a small country. This small country has chips. Lots and lots of chips, but these aren't chips that they can't make themselves, so it isn't about chips, or natural resources, or anything like that. I don't think anyway. Breakaway province and all of that, but I think, as these things usually are, it's simply about nationalism, hegemony, and power. They have a fair amount of money, and they want to use it to flex muscle by extending cheap loans to countries that can never pay them back. Which means they want to force some foreclosures in the future. Which means they want global assets to secure global aims.

Advertisement

Okay, so back to my other question: What are they waiting on? Only they know, but it could be a number of things. I'd like to contemplate some of the possibilities here. Maybe they are still testing reaction times with their encroachment into Taiwanese airspace. Every time they compel the ROCAF to take off and respond, they're putting wear and tear on Taiwanese jets and pilots. Parts burn out that can't be replaced right away, and pilots get fatigued. Sounds kind of frivolous, but it turns out this is a real thing.

The Challenge of Landing Troops

Maybe they're still working on the problem of landing hundreds of thousands of troops on the Taiwanese coast. The Chinese have always relied on mass quantities of men to achieve their military goals. Korea, everybody knows that story. And for a story not everybody does, see Vietnam in 1979. The Chinese launched a punitive attack (for Hanoi's decapitation of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, a Chinese ally) with 600,000 troops. The People's Liberation Army occupied a sizable portion of northern Vietnam, stuck around for a couple of months, lost around 26,000 dead, and then just up and left. They wanted to send a message that they could come in anytime they desired and do anything they wished. We want that new car in the showroom. We don't care how much it costs. So today, with Taiwan, they aren't going to care about the cost either, but they will care about the logistical problems of getting enough people on the island to saturate its defenses and absorb it like The Borg.

There are problems. The undersea shelf that Taiwan sits on is kind of shallow on the western side (facing China), and it actually has few beaches that aren't full of rocks, cliffs, and other such obstacles... on all coasts. If you want your landing craft to avoid destruction, you probably want some water under that keel because of mines, traps, and tides. If you want your troops to get a beachhead, terrain that favors your enemy is going to slow you down. Especially if your plans are reliant on pushing huge quantities of men onto that beach before they can be blown up by artillery, missiles, or bombs while massed there. So maybe they're in the process of working that out. Or it could be that they're still building the number of landing craft that they think they'll need. Might be that.

Advertisement

Right now, they're building some very interesting self-propelled landing barges that analysts are likening to the Mulberry harbors the Allies employed during the Normandy invasion. Think of Speed Racer's car up on the automatic jacks....only a lot bigger. And they come in three sizes. It's believed that they have 3-5 of these things, and they can move up and down with the tides by crawling vertically on their support pylons as needed. These have "bailey bridges" up to about 430' long that will reach over poor terrain from which to offload vehicles and men. I think if you're China, there's only one reason for constructing these. I guess a good question would be, how many of these will they need to carry out a successful invasion?

Vulnerabilities at Sea

Anyway, an invasion force of that size is going to have to be supplied by sea, which, of course, will be very exposed to US submarine attack. China has submarines of its own, slightly fewer than we do, but not nearly as capable. Most of those are diesel/electric, which means they have to surface about every 48 hours to recharge their batteries. A significant vulnerability. Ours are all nuclear. They never have to pop up in the daylight, if at all.  It's also interesting that the Chinese don't seem to be placing a lot of emphasis on producing submarines for an upcoming war effort. It's true that they're developing boats like the Type 095, which is supposed to have a water jet propulsion instead of standard props to keep noise levels down, as well as a lot of other whiz bangs, but that's a completely new class under construction and likely won't show up for work anytime soon. But right now, they are trying to sell submarines (that you would think they'd want to keep for a new war) to countries like Thailand and India. I think that's a little odd. Especially when they trail us in capability and generally rely on numbers to overcome such gaps.

Advertisement

When the Chinese do invade, they could lose a lot of ships, but with the largest merchant capability in the world, it may not matter how many hulls go down, but what type of cargo those hulls were carrying and how critical to their war effort those items were. Moreover, the US invests a significant amount of time and money in anti-submarine warfare (ASW). The Chinese don't. They put their efforts into anti-shipping, with most of their destroyer types emphasizing those types of weapons.

I would expect that Chinese efforts to conquer Taiwan will include resupply by air. That won't be able to deliver the numbers they need, and it will be a supplemental effort to a sealift as with many historic invasions. Transports are not stealthy, nor are they fast, so one can expect an attrition rate on those from either land-based missiles or fighter planes. But being a stone's throw away from home, Chinese airpower is certainly going to have the numbers to favor their efforts. Especially if the claims about their hypersonic missiles are true and will keep our carriers with their fighter wings loitering out around Guam. I don't know if there's really any reliable information about either their capabilities or our defenses against those. Maybe someone on here can enlighten. But an airlift will require that runways be captured at some point because resupply by parachute isn't ever going to be as effective. 

So now I guess it's time to look at the people involved. I'm not going to consider the US Navy right now because of the hypersonic missile threat. If it's as real as some analysts believe, and we have no effective defense against them, I'm not sure pushing them into the South China Sea is going to be a great course of action. You don't want to turn your best capital ships into floating hotels that never see their intended purpose (Tirpitz, Yamato, Musashi), but then again, you don't want to waste them (and the 5,000 men and women who crew them) on a fight they have no defense against. So I guess for us, that leaves the silent service. American submarine crews have a very long history and a very long learning curve of how to do things right. The Chinese don't. It's that straightforward. Those shortcomings will manifest themselves somehow in a fight, and it probably won't favor the Chinese Navy-Army, Army-Navy, or whatever they call it.

Advertisement

The Role of Airpower

I would expect the US Air Force will be showing up with bombers out of Guam and Australia and a lot of other stuff out of Japan, like fighters and surveillance. And I also expect the US Air Force will display their usual expertise and professionalism. They'll bloody some noses. I also expect that China will "punish" the Japanese for hosting the Allied war effort (I think that's how we'll look at it because Australia and Japan are probably going to get involved under the "You're Next" maxim) by extending the fight to their soil as a way to get their populations to pressure their governments toward neutrality. I don't think this will work and, at the same time, will probably invite direct airstrikes on the Chinese coast. China will saber rattle about nuclear retaliation, and Trump might respond with a typical "You want to take a swing at us that way, remember that you have 500 nukes and we have 5000." They probably think he's crazy anyway, but they do know he's unpredictable.

Anyway, back to people, particularly how the Chinese may fight. Their pilots have been aggressive to the point of ramming American surveillance aircraft. They've also done the reckless stuff that you read in the news from time to time (thumping, crazing, and near-misses). Like fighter pilots the world over, these are your Type-A personalities. I don't think any of them will shy away from a fight, and their effectiveness will come down to how well the equipment works and the numbers they put up since they have no experience. Experience in a flier counts for a lot because of rule #11. "The best pilots fly more than the others; that's why they're the best." So I think the Chinese-Air Force-Army...Navy-thing, or whatever they call that one, will show up. The actual Army is not going to be full of your Type-A personalities but a mix of everything. However, they will all be stamped from the same die. Probably very radical and very motivated. One would think they'd fight very hard because Beijing is likely telling them that Taiwan is really Chinese soil, so they're probably going to motivate the troops by saying, "You're fighting for your homeland." I think the plan will be to saturate and overcome since Beijing doesn't care how many death notices it has to send out to families. Nobody over there is going to be aware of the kinship they will share with other "gold star" mothers because Xinhua will just compartmentalize it all.

Advertisement

And What of the Taiwanese?

So, finally, we have the Taiwanese. I have absolutely no doubt that they will fight very hard and be extremely difficult to overcome. Taiwan is their home, Red China is their enemy, and I don't think any of them want to be subjugated and forced to live under the communist system. There are over 23 million of them, and they are all being asked to train for war on some level. I think that if they are initially overcome, they will resort to asymmetrical warfare, and given the fact that they share the physical characteristics and language of their enemy, it will be very hard for the PLA to pacify them all. As we have learned from past wars, they're difficult to win when you cannot tell your friends from your enemies. And maybe this is the main concern of the Chinese war planners. I don't know, and I don't think anyone else does either, but if Beijing is not threatened by this puzzle piece, it probably should be.

To conclude, I don't think a Chinese invasion of Taiwan is going to be a walkover. I think it will turn out to be a very bloody war of attrition and a festering wound for the Chinese. It is almost certainly going to cost them something in world trade and the state of their economy. Which right now, might just be a little bit iffy.

Editor's Note: Every single day, here at RedState, we will stand up and FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT against the radical left and deliver the conservative reporting our readers deserve.

Help us continue to tell the truth about the Trump administration and its major wins. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos