On Wednesday, I wrote about the infuriating atrocity committed by a woman named Lindsay Clancy. For those who didn't read it, Clancy strangled her three children, ages 5, 3, and 8 months, after having her husband leave the house to run some errands.
The trial for the murders is now underway, and Clancy's attorneys are attempting to find her guilty by reason of insanity, not intent, holding up her postpartum depression and the myriad of medications (most of which she apparently hadn't taken) as the true culprit. Victory, at least for her, means Clancy spends a long time in psychiatric facilities and not life in prison.
As I wrote Wednesday, she must be found guilty of intent, and that's in large part because she needs to be made an example of for the cult-like followers she's developed since the start of her trial. If you're on social media, you've likely seen them by now. Feminists and anti-male psychopaths who have created an entire subculture around Clancy being innocent. Not just of intent, but of murdering her children in the first place.
Read: Lindsay Clancy's Insanity Defense Cannot Excuse the Murder of Her Three Children
At the very least, they want to paint her as a victim for women who have to endure the trials and tribulations of womanhood in a world where men are in control.
It's the same nonsense on a day that ends in "Y," only this time the victimization extends to "she was having a hard time because everyone failed her, and her murdering her children wasn't her fault. It was everyone else's."
“It could be me.”
— Kangmin Lee | 이강민 (@kangminlee) August 20, 2026
Lock all of these women up. I’m not even exaggerating they are a threat to any children in their immediate vicinity pic.twitter.com/98mfUOzYRe
So we might be cooked pic.twitter.com/hcNGNsByqE
— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) August 20, 2026
To be clear, she was having a lot of mental illness issues. That much is true, but according to the facts, the idea that she's some victim of the century is, itself, insane.
The cult that sprung up around Clancy doesn't just stop at seeing her as the victim of a system that failed her. Some of these people are so desperate to see her as innocent that they're saying it's all a conspiracy and the husband is the one who actually did it. Moreover, her confession that she killed the children was actually something he had gaslit her into believing.
All of that is nonsense, of course. If you want to know why, this woman explains it well, but I'm not going to dive too deeply into it myself.
Warning: video contains explicit descriptions of violent acts
The “same, lindsay” trend is weird and disturbing + I debunk some of the claims surrounding Patrick Clancy pic.twitter.com/bT7rHGwUzF
— Chloe (@ItsAllPoliticss) August 19, 2026
What I do want to dig into is something I covered a bit earlier on Thursday. The background reason as to why this cult sprang up.
As I wrote in my last VIP piece, turning someone into a psychotic radical who will pardon the worst crimes based on who committed them is based on the Marxist idea of pushing people into "oppressor" vs "oppressed" groups, and they do this by deconstructing Western systems:
When they say "systems," what they're really saying is "foundational elements." For America, that would be things like capitalism, Judeo-Christian values, God-given rights, and liberty-based philosophies. If you want to destroy America, you make these foundational elements seem oppressive. Not oppressive generally, mind you, just oppressive to certain groups. If there isn't a system oppressing a group they need to feel victimized, then just create one.
If you need women to feel oppressed and victimized, then create a mustache-twirling villain called "the patriarchy," a nebulous system with the sinister intent of limiting women's rights. You'll hear the word pop up every time feminists want to control something or kill a child.
Modern feminism is based heavily on Marxist ideology. It is one of the largest "oppressed" groups there is. Even if these feminists who dress in pink and are showing up to worship at the altar of a child murderer aren't Marxists, they've been heavily influenced by it to believe that a woman who killed her own small children isn't at fault because she is one of the "oppressed"... just like them.
Clancy can't be guilty because if she is, then that's a loss of power over society. She's not a victim. She's a criminal, and if victimhood is power in our society, then it gives modern feminism boundaries it can't cross. Accountability is the opposite of power.
This is one of the reasons I said in my last article that Clancy must be found guilty of intent, because if she's not, then you're going to see a lot more horrendous things happen under the excuse of the offender being a victim of something. This would include more dead children.
So, these feminists must do whatever they can to make sure Clancy is somehow innocent. Somehow, some way. The collapse of Western society and the establishment of new systems could greatly benefit from this.
Now, to be sure, a lot of these women are just useful idiots who don't know how brainwashed they are, but some of them know exactly why they're urging support for Clancy. They know how society can bend to them if they do.
