During Donald Trump’s dramatic press conference Saturday night following the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, he brought up what for some might be an unlikely subject: his plans for a grand ballroom at the White House.
The project is already under construction, but it’s been like watching a ping pong game with leftist groups and activist judges making every attempt to stop the effort in any way they can. “It’s on!” one judge will rule. “No, it’s not — it’s a danger to Democracy!” another will decide the next day, throwing down a temporary restraining order.
In what is a great irony, the “progressives,” a group made up almost entirely of Democrats and hard-core leftists, are almost always against anything resembling “progress.”
The chaos at the Washington Hilton in D.C. proved two things, however: political violence, especially directed toward anything Trump, has been on a disturbing rise, and two, securing a hotel is a very difficult endeavor indeed. There are so many questions that will need to be answered in the upcoming days: why were the magnetometers so close to the ballroom? Wouldn’t it have been smarter to catch potential bad guys long before they got anywhere near their targets?
Meanwhile, was every single hotel guest vetted? Was each and every room searched? The hotel can accommodate over 1,100 occupants on any given night, so that’s highly unlikely. It would be a massive endeavor, and indeed, there are many reports that the suspect, 31-year-old Californian Cole Tomas Allen, was actually a paying hotel customer.
You would have none of these issues if such an event were held in a heavily fortified facility protected by the world’s finest security forces, a space with bunkers and countermeasures that they could tell you about, but then they’d have to kill you.
Trump’s ballroom, which taxpayers aren’t funding but instead private donations are, would be much more than just a party palace. Following yet another judge butting in earlier in April, Trump blasted him for not understanding that it isn't just a vanity project to honor the People’s House, it is a security issue:
Trump:
…[The judge is] attempting to prevent future Presidents and World Leaders from having a safe and secure large scale Meeting Place, or Ballroom, one with Bomb Shelters, a State of the Art Hospital and Medical Facilities, Protective Partitioning, Top Secret Military Installations, Structures, and Equipment, Protective Missile Resistant Steel, Columns, Roofs, and Beams, Drone Proof Ceilings and Roofs, Military Grade Venting, and Bullet, Ballistic, and Blast Proof Glass —which all means that no future President, living in the White House without this Ballroom, can ever be Safe and Secure at Events, Future Inaugurations, or Global Summits. This Magnificent Space will allow them to carry out their vital duties as the Leader of our Nation. Furthermore, the Ballroom, which is being constructed on budget and ahead of schedule, is needed now.
I don’t think that if you held an official dinner at a place like that, you’d have shooters firing rounds right outside the entrance. (And if they did… Buh-bye.)
MORE LEGAL DANCING: Trump Blasts Ballroom Judge, Reiterates Project Was Always About So Much More Than a Banquet Hall
DC Judge to White House: Security Exception Is Not a Blank Check for Your Ballroom
Trump alluded to just that in his presser:
.@POTUS: "We need the ballroom. That's why Secret Service—that's why the military are demanding it. They wanted the ballroom for 150 years for lots of different reasons but today is a little bit different because today we need levels of security that nobody has ever seen before." pic.twitter.com/Aw9oM1YQis
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) April 26, 2026
I sincerely doubt you’d see scenes like this playing out in the literal seat of our nation’s power, the White House:
The scene inside the Washington Hilton ballroom immediately after President Trump was rushed out of the White House Correspondents Dinner pic.twitter.com/dzaYREX3Ah
— Steven Nelson (@stevennelson10) April 26, 2026
One of California’s leading gubernatorial candidates, billionaire Democrat Tom Steyer, has recently been calling for leftists to “fight fire with fire” (a bit tone-deaf considering that state just suffered incredibly destructive wildfires, dontcha think, Tom?). That’s basically an incredibly unsubtle call to violence, but he’s far from the only one. “Mainstream” politicians like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), California Dem Gov. Gavin Newsom, and so many others have been ratcheting up the rhetoric to 11, and the results have been entirely predictable.
TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk was slain in cold blood, there have been three assassination attempts against Trump, and a health care CEO and father of two had his life ruthlessly exterminated at the hands of leftist hero Luigi Mangione. This is what they're demanding.
A heavily fortified facility that could keep the president safe — while also serving as a ballroom and a suitable place to host international dignitaries instead of fêting them in tents on the mud-plagued lawn — is clearly the smart move.
Makes the case for a super secure ballroom, doesn’t it? https://t.co/D0mdT74K7l
— Real Tim Donnelly (@PatriotNotPol) April 26, 2026
Which, of course, is the main reason Democrats oppose it. They’re acting all shocked on news programs around the country tonight, but this is what they've been calling for, and once again, this is what they've got.
Get out of the way, activist judges, and let people who have a clue do what they need to do: build the ballroom.
