Science Journal Blasts Star Wars for Othering, 'Orientalism' and White Saviorism

(AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)

Science, as you may have heard, has evolved.

These days, the field of study’s leaving the laboratory to solve societal woes.

Cases in point:

Medical School Hosts Seminar on ‘Body Terrorism’ Against ‘Fat LGBTQ+ People’


Science Journal Decries Racism in Geology, Claims Black People Are Too Scared to Hold Hammers

Mental Health Journal’s Article on ‘Parasitic Whiteness’ Laments There’s ‘Not Yet a Permanent Cure’

Lately, the discipline’s pummeling a problematic science fiction saga.

In the new edition of Scientific American, five experts offer analysis.

“Within the narrative world of Star Wars,” they observe, “to be a member of the Jedi is seemingly to be a paragon of goodness, a principled guardian of order and protector of the innocent.”

Yet, evil is afoot.

For one thing, the holy order’s corrosively corporate:

“Jedi” is more than just a name: It’s a product. Circulating that product’s name can promote and benefit the corporation that owns it, even if we do not mean to do so. We are, in effect, providing that corporation — Disney — with a form of free advertising, commodifying and cheapening our justice work in the process.

Moreover, keepers of the peace don’t keep with inclusion:

Those unfamiliar or uncomfortable with Star Wars­­ — including those hurt by the messages it sends — may feel alienated by the parade of jokes, puns and references surrounding the term “Jedi.”

Most egregious, the world of blasters and battle droids is rife with that most dastardly of Dark Sides: white supremacy.


“Star Wars has a problematic cultural legacy,” the paper laments.

The space opera franchise has been critiqued for trafficking in injustices such as sexism, racism and ableism.

Consider “so-called ‘Slave Leia.'”

Her being bound, the article asserts, employs the “first leading woman” in an “Orientalist subplot.”

Orientalism, essentially, otherizes anything not strong, masculine, and Western.

Additionally, Star Wars “conflates ‘alienness’ with ‘nonwhiteness.'”

It often relies “on racist stereotypes when depicting nonhuman species.”

Beyond that, Darth Vader’s vehicle should sport a parking placard:

The series regularly defaults onto ableist tropes, memorably in its portrayal of Darth Vader, which links the villain’s physical disability with machinic inhumanity and moral deviance, presenting his technology-assisted breathing as a sinister auditory marker of danger and doom.


Down with white centerism:

[T]he bodies and voices centered in Star Wars have, with few exceptions, historically been those of white men. And while recent films have increased gender and racial diversity, important questions remain regarding how meaningfully such changes represent a departure from the series’ problematic past. Indeed, a notable segment of the Star Wars fandom has aggressively advocated the (re)centering of white men in the franchise, with some equating recent casting decisions with “white genocide.”

And why is Scientific American so interested in Star Wars?

As the authors explain, an acronym has “become a popular term for branding academic committees and labeling STEMM…initiatives focused on social justice issues.”

Hence, a disturbance in the Force:

The abbreviation JEDI can distract from justice, equity, diversity and inclusion.

When you think about the word JEDI, what comes to mind? Chances are good that for many, the immediate answer isn’t the concept “Justice” (or its comrades “Equity,” “Diversity” and “Inclusion”).

Furthermore, “The Jedi are inappropriate mascots for social justice.”

They are a religious order of intergalactic police-monks, prone to (white) saviorism and toxically masculine approaches to conflict resolution (violent duels with phallic lightsabers, gaslighting by means of “Jedi mind tricks,” etc.). The Jedi are also an exclusionary cult, membership to which is partly predicated on the possession of heightened psychic and physical abilities (or “Force-sensitivity”). Strikingly, Force-wielding talents are narratively explained in Star Wars not merely in spiritual terms but also in ableist and eugenic ones: These supernatural powers are naturalized as biological, hereditary attributes. … The heroic Jedi are thus emblems for a host of dangerously reactionary values and assumptions. Sending the message that justice work is akin to cosplay is bad enough; dressing up our initiatives in the symbolic garb of the Jedi is worse


So there ya go.

Might midi-chlorians be dog whistles for whiteness?


It’s all significant to note.

In closing, a look at the films’ toxically masculine, nuttily religious, in-desperate-need-of-defunding white supremacists:

And let’s not forget the two most powerful KKK members in the star system:

Other white nationalists leading the Rebellion:


For final proof of Aryan Nation protagonism, consider the saga’s villain.

I give you the Supreme Leader, head of the Empire and the Sith — who in no way should be confused with a white male:

If you’re looking for white supremacy, as we’re perpetually informed, it’s as nearby as can be.

But you’ll also find it in a galaxy far, far away.

For those who doubt it…just follow the science — like a good wookiee.

Sorry — wokie.



See more pieces from me:

Revolt in Ship Shape: School District Cancels a Columbus Vessel Cartoon, but Is It in Vain?

Dr. No Means No: New James Bond Director Accuses Sean Connery’s 007 of Rape


Riveting Reversal: University Cancels Segregated ‘Antiracism’ Training

Find all my RedState work here.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos