Donald Trump Jr. Explains Evolution of Democrats on 'Believe All Women' in One Brutal Tweet

AP Photo/Brynn Anderson

The “Believe All Women” mantra that became all the rage in Democratic circles in 2018 during the hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was not anything that serious-minded people who were truly concerned about female victims of sexual assault should have ever glommed on to.

Advertisement

The primary reason, of course, was that in doing so, one was undermining the core basis behind the concept of due process where the accused are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law (or, in some cases, the court of public opinion absent an actual courtroom).

The second reason was that the phrase was subjective; its users – most often radical activists on the left including progressive feminist groups, only seemed to care about (believe) women who stepped forth with sexual harassment/assault allegations when the allegations were being made against a male public figure who was presumed to be pro-life, which is what happened after Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of rape.

The rank hypocrisy of said feminists was on full, ugly display for all the world to see after then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) was accused by multiple women in 2021 of sexual harassment and in one instance of actual assault. As we learned later after the disgraced Democrat reluctantly stepped down, women’s groups who ostensibly operated from a #MeToo mindset were found to have actively aided Cuomo in the smearing of his accusers.

And in 2020 after then-Democrat candidate for president Joe Biden was accused of rape by former Senate aide Tara Reade, some feminists stepped forward to admit that they didn’t care if Biden was a rapist – that they’d vote for him anyway.

Advertisement

In any event, as the old Virginia Slims cigarette ads once suggested about women, “you’ve come a long way, baby” or not at all, really, when one considers the Democrats’ evolution on “Believe All Women” from the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing days, to the ones for Amy Coney Barrett, to now during the Ketanji Brown Jackson hearings, where Brown infamously declared Tuesday that she could not define what a woman was because she’s not a biologist:

The point here, of course, is that pretty much any topic that relates to women, whether it be in “believing” them or “supporting” them or allegedly championing their causes, every single bit of it is nothing more than cheap, intentionally divisive theater for Democrats. As noted above, their believing, supporting, and championing is all subjective, purely based on the politics of the person being accused rape, being a handmaiden, etc.

Worse still, this is not designed to benefit or advance women in our society in any way, shape, or form. In reality, it’s designed to advance the careers of Democrat movers and shakers in the media and entertainment industries, at think tanks, and in government. It’s just as simple (and repugnant) as that.

Advertisement

The realization of all this was a big reason why I left liberalism behind and became a conservative long ago. I just wish more women could see beyond the coordinated emotional manipulation being done by the left and do the same. The world would be a much better place for it if they did.

Related: If You’re a ‘Feminine Products’ Company and You’re Doing This to Women, You’re Doing It Wrong

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos