One Good Reason Why Biden Would Tap Hillary Clinton for U.N. Ambassador

Democratic National Convention via AP

The Washington Times, Fox News and the Independent are abuzz over rumors that Joe Biden’s transition team is considering former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for United Nations Ambassador.

This is indicative of Joe Biden: always failing forward.

The former Secretary of State wears the Benghazi deaths like an albatross around her neck, as ably documented by davenj here, here, here, AND here.

Clinton is an abysmally failed and embittered presidential candidate. How do you pay for a doctored dossier to smear your opponent and derail his campaign, and end up getting derailed yourself?

“Once upon a time, a presidential candidate named Hillary Clinton resorted to drastic measures to defeat her opponent, Donald Trump. However, during the campaigning season, she realized that her past sins during her tenure as secretary of state were catching up with her. So, in an act of desperation, her team concocted a false narrative claiming that Trump was collaborating with the Russian government to swing the result of the election in his favor.

“Unfortunately for Clinton, her grand scheme failed miserably, and Trump won the election, much to her disappointment.”

So, on what planet would anyone think she’d be a good candidate for U.N. Ambassador?

Fox claims that

“Clinton was ‘being discussed’ as a potential pick because it would purportedly raise the prestige and standing of the U.S. after President Trump’s time in office.”

Clinton’s partner in Benghazi crimes, the Lyin’ Susan Rice, took to Twitter to pooh-pooh the idea:

 

My colleague Robert A. Hahn agrees:

“Biden offering the UN Ambassador slot to Hillary Clinton is meant as an insult, and will be taken as an insult. That’s a slot they use for bright up-and-comers to give them a gold star to put on their resumes. It is not something you offer a former Senator and Secretary of State.”

Even Irish Parliamentarian Mick Wallace thinks it’s a terrible idea, reigniting the cry of Hillary for Prison. Who would have thunk?

The only reason I see is that Clinton will jump start the corrupt Clinton Foundation and reestablish the access pipeline between U.S. government policymakers and corrupt foreign governments. Tens of millions of dollars were funneled through the Foundation in 2016 with the hope that a Clinton Presidency would allow dictators easy access to America’s foreign policy secrets. Those wasted dollars disappeared once Clinton lost spectacularly. Open Secrets reported on this precipitous decline in revenue, and that the Foundation is now operating in the red:

“The Clinton Foundation’s $30.7 million revenue last year is less than half the $62.9 million it raised in 2016 as Clinton was at the height of her presidential campaign. Each of the two years since Clinton’s loss in the 2016 election has seen the organization’s revenue drop to record lows, raising less than any fiscal year in more than a decade — a sharp contrast to the $249 million raised during Clinton’s first year as secretary of state.”

The Bidens and the Clintons could see this as the perfect opportunity to resurrect the enrichment train for both crime families. After all, Hunter is tainted. Even if the investigations go away, he is too exposed. So Biden needs a new gravy train, and Clinton needs a reason to leave her house, as those speaking engagements have dried up along with the corrupt dollars.

Donald Trump single-handedly drained the Swamp. Hillary Clinton could single-handedly fill it back up.

It would not be out of character for these craven carcasses.