Premium

Denmark Proves That When You Import the Third World, You Get the Third World

AP Photo/Mahmud Hossain Opu

Not that we needed more confirmation about this, but a little more info never hurt anybody... except for the globalists trying to force the third world on people. 

An interesting study out of Denmark effectively confirmed a pattern we all knew to be true about importing immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East, and this one covered a long time period of three decades. The study itself is in Danish, so reading it without translation tech is tough, but no worries, because people have been all over the study on Instagram and X. 

The study was covered by the Elder Millennial, but was also laid out by Molly Pitcher on X, who posted the overall results of the study for easy consumption: 

Denmark tracked 321 Palestinian asylum seekers granted entry in 1992 for nearly 30 years. 

Results for the original group:

 •  64% (204) convicted of crimes 

•  22% (71) sent to prison 

•  55% (176) on welfare Their ~999 children: 

•  34% convicted of crimes 

•  37% on welfare 

This isn’t integration—it’s a massive, multi-generational burden on Danish taxpayers. 

Uncontrolled migration without strong assimilation has real costs.  

Denmark saw it firsthand.

So, what you're effectively looking at is proof positive that leaders with a globalist mentality are making you pay for what is effectively a crime, welfare, and infrastructure cost increase. There is no benefit for you in any real capacity, except that those who believe they're being better, more noble people by importing trouble from the third world. 

Something that needs to be fully understood here, and it's something that is often labeled as racist, is that our Western culture is wholly incompatible with theirs. 


READ MORE: Britain 2026: Children Now Too Terrified to Walk Home Without Official Escorts

Chaos in Clapham: A Study in 3rd World Immigration and Cultural Clashes


Let's take melanin levels out of it for a moment and focus purely on belief systems. 

There are high-trust cultures and low-trust cultures. Western and Japanese cultures are generally high-trust cultures. If you were to park your car, open your trunk, and walk away for 24 hours, when you came back, everything in your trunk would likely still be there. In fact, you may have someone ringing your doorbell to tell you that you might have forgotten. 

High-trust cultures take these kinds of niceties and respect for others' property as a responsibility, because we know that our level of success depends on it. 

One year at a CPAC event, I lost my wallet, and my friends joked that once I got it back, I'd likely find more money in it than I'd lost. The truth behind the joke was that I was in a place where respect for that trust was at its statistical maximum.  

However, cultures from Middle Eastern areas are not brought up with this level of respect, thanks to various factors, be they religious or historical. The idea of a high-trust society is alien to many of them, or due to religious reasons, they may see this as an avenue for domination. Western culture wishes to maintain through selflessness and responsibility, but some cultures, especially those that practice Islam, don't share that mentality. Only one thing ultimately matters, and it's the spread of their culture. 

Even decency and protection of the innocent and pure are seen as something either bothersome or worth ignoring by their own cultural standards, which is wholly antithetical to the most common beliefs of Western culture. 

Take, for instance, this recent clip of a Muslim man who was caught trying to rape a 14-year-old girl, and explained that what he was doing was legal according to Sharia law. 

And this isn't an uncommon belief either. Here's a man saying effectively the same thing, and that he's actually to be rewarded for raping a non-Muslim girl. 

It's not just disrespect for people. It's disrespect for things. 

Perhaps you saw the viral video of a Muslim youth casually tearing down a wall that's probably older than America, because he wanted to go to the other side of the wall. 

They will tell you that pointing these things out is racism, but race isn't the issue here. It's effectively an entire world's difference in cultures that are not compatible with one another. High-trust societies operate on respect for your fellow man and allow for societal, technological, and economic advancement. Low-trust societies like Islamic ones do not allow for the building of societies and will actively tear other societies down in the name of their socio-politically based religion. 

But to put it more pithily...

Import the third world, become the third world. 

Recommended

Trending on RedState Videos