Discipline Is Indigestable: Health Official Warns Against Workplace Cake, Compares It to Secondhand Smoke

Discipline Is Indigestable: Health Official Warns Against Workplace Cake, Compares It to Secondhand Smoke
(UKIP)

Have you ever caught secondhand diabetes? It seems that may be a possibility, based on statements by a UK academic.

Per a piece in The Times, University of Oxford Professor Susan Jebb has a bone to pick with food — or those who support it being sweetly served at work.

In fact, Susan likens complimentary cake to cigarette smoke:

Bringing cake into the office should be seen as harmful to your colleagues in the same way as passive smoking, [Susan] has said.

And she’s no mere educator; Susan is “Britain’s top food watchdog” — chair of the United Kingdom’s Food Standards Agency (FSA).

In the past, it was thought people possessed autonomous will; things shoved into their mouths and mercilessly ground came courtesy of conscious choice. These days, we appear to have moved beyond such simplicity; just as every person is acting upon the world, the world is doing a number on them.

So cake brought into the office? Like smoke in our surroundings, we can’t help but breathe it in. Not everyone’s extraordinary:

Jebb, professor of diet and population health at the University of Oxford and a member of The Times Health Commission, said it was not enough to rely on the “extraordinary efforts” of personal willpower needed to avoid overeating in a society that is constantly plying people with food.

“Speaking in a personal capacity and not on behalf of the FSA,” Susan dropped science. Don’t think too highly of yourself:

“We all like to think we’re rational, intelligent, educated people who make informed choices the whole time [but] we undervalue the impact of the environment.”

Hence:

“If nobody brought…cakes into the office, I would not eat cakes in the day; but because people do bring cakes in, I eat them. Now, okay, I have made a choice, but people were making a choice to go into a smoky pub.”

Above all, do no harm:

While saying the two issues were not identical, Jebb argued that passive smoking inflicted harm on others “and exactly the same is true of food.”

She argued: “With smoking, after a very long time, we have got to a place where we understand that individuals have to make some effort but that we can make their efforts more successful by having a supportive environment. But we still don’t feel like that about food.”

Is the assertion that we shouldn’t consume copious amounts of cake fatphobic? Or, rather, is bringing cake to work a microaggression? Or could both be simultaneously true? That debate is welcome to rage.

In the meantime, The Times talks of health:

At its first meeting on Monday night, Lord Rose of Monewden…suggested that workplaces should do more for people’s health. Rose, who undertook a review of the NHS for David Cameron, said that businesses already had to report efforts on equality, diversity and pay, asking: “Why don’t we lobby to say that also in that process as employers, we have a legal obligation to do something about our employees’ health?”

Two thirds of adults are overweight, including a quarter who are obese, a proportion that has doubled in the past three decades. By the time they start school, a fifth of children are already overweight, with most people in Britain now too heavy by the age of 25.

In our increasingly sensitive era, making such points may be problematic:

Professor Fights for the ‘Freedom of Fat Bodies’

Medical School Hosts Seminar on ‘Body Terrorism’ Against ‘Fat LGBTQ+ People’

Humiliation: Movie Review Condemns Whoopi Goldberg’s Non-Existent ‘Fat Suit’

So goes social progress. Even so, Professor Susan is anti-secondhand cake. Furthermore, she “told The Times that (the) advertising of junk food was ‘undermining people’s free will’ and insisted restrictions were ‘not about the nanny state.'” She’s “dismayed that a ban on advertising junk food…has been pushed back to 2025.”

If coworker cake can’t be boldly banned, perhaps we can apply Susan’s sentiment with a move from Bill Clinton’s playbook: If someone offers you carcinogen-adjacent cake, put a little in your mouth but don’t inhale it.

-ALEX

 

See more content from me:

College Founded in 1892 Offers Dorm for Transgender Students

Christian Shopper Is Ordered to Remove His ‘Jesus Saves’ Shirt or Leave — at the Mall of America

‘Devastated’ Transgender in Training Gets Whacked From Women’s Gym, Calls the Human Rights Commission

Find all my RedState work here.

Thank you for reading! Please sound off in the Comments section below.

Trending on RedState Video