Michael O’Brien over at The Hill is reporting that Congressman Barney Frank (D, Mass.) is backtracking on his previous support of Rep. Michelle Bachmann’s (R, Minn.) bill that would prevent federal money from going to the corruption plagued Association of Community Activists for Reform Now (ACORN).
Bachmann had initially gotten Frank’s support for a bill that would toughen regulations on community organizers preventing groups like ACORN from getting federal money if any of its employees came under indictment for voter fraud.
But this week Frank pulled his support saying he will instead back an amendment that prevents federal funding for groups with employee convictions, not just indictments.
Bachmann blasted Frank’s sudden reversal.
“Are we expected to keep forking over tax dollars to these organization when they’re under the cloud of suspicion of a public criminal indictment?” Bachmann asked in a statement.
“If nothing else, this shows us just how much influence ACORN and others have over Chairman Frank and the Democrat party,” she said. “Your tax dollars are being abused.”
I am forced, however, to agree with one of the most odious Congressmen in Washington D.C. on this one. Frank is right to say we can’t attack an entire organization merely because of one indictment of one of its employees. After all, an indictment is not necessarily guilt proven. As with the many false “indictments” on Tom DeLay in Texas, we on the right side of the aisle should admit that indictments are no proof of anything and can easily be politically motivated. Further a single indictment of an employee is also not necessarily proof of any collusion by the organization for which the employee works.
But this situation is being approached from the wrong direction, anyway. We should not be trying to determine when and under what circumstances these so-called community organizers should receive federal funds. We should be discussing the outright elimination of ALL such funding whether the organization is a criminal enterprise or not.
The federal government has NO business funding ANY of these groups. Period.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
freerepublic has a report this AM.....
wolfgang Saturday, May 2nd at 7:19AM EST (link)…about the Whitehouse threatening one of Chrysler’s creditors by unleashing the WhiteHouse presscorps on them and subsequently destroying their reputation.
Maybe el Rahmbo threatened Queen Barney by hinting loudly that he would release a minute by minute summary of the Banking Queen’s dalliances over on the wild side.
But how much worse can his reputation get? Unless the WhiteHouse has actual videos.
Actual Videos? They probably do.
papalee Sunday, May 3rd at 11:06PM EST (link)I walked into an office in City Hall in San Francisco where they were running a video of a member of the Board of Supervisors doing the wild thing all clad in black leathers. It got shut off quickly but I noted that he voted more frequently with the mayor that he had done previously.
But then James Roosevelt said that his daddy had every one wire tapped and listened to all of their most interesting phone calls. This is the reason that conservative politicians have to really toe the straight and narrow because they will never be forgiven the sort of things which never bothered Democrats about the activities of Franks and Gerry Studds.
With half the Clinton machine in the WH
Karina (Diary) Saturday, May 2nd at 8:18AM EST (link)Why are any of us surprised at their antics? Obama has taken them down to a whole new level. I’ll bet they’re learning a lot from the Chicago crowd. They have to make sure ACORN is taken care of so they can be ready for the midterm elections.
Blackmail
farstar99 (Diary) Saturday, May 2nd at 11:33AM EST (link)Truth is, no Democrat would ever actually DO ANYTHING against ACORN, naturally.
It’s all talk, to stop a popular uprising, and any Democrat doing the talking is just trying to extort some money for himself from the same Soros and taxpayer-funded trough as Obama and his cronies.