Megyn Kelly had Donna Brazile in her crosshairs last night (that is a metaphor for all you progressive hipsters who were triggered, it is not a literal statement of fact) and Donna Brazile emerged shaken and revealed as an obvious liar.
This is the background. One of the windfalls of the Wikileaks publication of emails pilfered from the DNC was the revelation that then-CNN contributor and current DNC co-chair (take a moment and savor that career path and tell me the press is not a Democrat preserve) had access to at least one question that was going to be asked of Hillary Clinton in a town hall and she sent that question to Hillary’s campaign. This would seem to be unethical conduct of the lowest sort. Not only was Brazile interceding to help her favored candidate she also betrayed the trust of her employer and her colleagues.
Megyn Kelly called her out on it and Brazile’s reputation as anything but a baldfaced and unconvincing liar will never be the same.
MEGYN KELLY: You’re accused of receiving a debate question whether a CNN town hall where they partnered with TV One that you had this question on March 12th, that verbatim, verbatim was provided by Roland Martin to CNN the next day. How did you get that question, Donna?
DONNA BRAZILE: Well, Kelly, as I play straight up and with you, I did not receive any questions from CNN.
Note the non-denial denial. No one has ever claimed Brazile got the question from CNN. The claim is that she got access to the question because of her CNN gig and promptly stole that information and passed it onto her buddies on the campaign of the Hillary Clinton.
KELLY: Where did you get it.
BRAZILE: What information? Allow me to see what you’re talking about?
Here Donna, I have a link for you.
KELLY: You’ve got the Wikileaks showing you messaging the Clinton campaign at the March 13th CNN debate.
BRAZILE: As a Christian woman, I understand persecution. your information is false. What you’re — well, for suggestive e-mails were stolen. You’re interested and you’re like a thief that wants to bring into the night the things that.
Donna, Donna, Donna. There is no real evidence that you are a “Christian woman” because a “Christian woman” would not steal information from her employer, betray the trust her colleagues have mistakenly placed in her integrity, tried to falsely aid one candidate over another when your job is to comment on politics, they would lie when caught and they certainly would accuse someone else of being a thief. That is called “psychological projection.”
Actually, Kelly is not like a thief and a “Christian woman” and all, Brazile should be familiar with Christ’s warning in Matthew 10:26: “For nothing is concealed that will not be uncovered, or hidden that will not be made known.”
It is also typically Democrat, particularly aged woman Democrat, that equates being caught in a lie or other misconduct with being persecuted as though having the correct age, genitalia (allegedly), and politics is a get out of free card.
KELLY: CNN’ Jake Tapper said this was unethical. Someone was unethically helping the Clinton campaign. He said this is very, very upsetting.
BRAZILE: I love CNN
KELLY: This is Jake Tapper: ‘My understand is that the e-mails came from Roland Martin and said this is very upsetting and troubling.’
That is your old colleague at CNN not Megyn Kelly. Who gave you that question?
BRAZILE: Megyn, I’ll say it on the record. I’m not going to try to validate falsified information. I have my documents. I have my files. Thank God I have not had my personal e-mails ripped off from me and stolen and given to some criminals to come back altered. I have my records and files. And as i said repeatedly, CNN, I never received anything.
This is gibberish gibbered by a gibberer. Is Megyn Kelly acting like a thief? Or is she passing an email that Brazile did not send? She can’t be both. If it is an altered version of an actual Brazile email and she has her “records and files,” well then, it should be damned easy to clear this up. Show us your “records and files.”
What you see here is a pathetic woman devoid of honor or integrity who has been caught in a lie — not that it really matters because CNN will gladly take her back — but she has never in her life faced hostile questioning and she’s reduced to an effervescent puddle of #FAIL.