Did the Clinton Foundation Subsidize One Of Bill Clinton's Mistresses?

Former President Bill Clinton participates in the closing plenary session of the Clinton Global Initiative 2015 Annual Meeting at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel, on Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2015 in New York. (Photo by Greg Allen/Invision/AP)
Former President Bill Clinton participates in the closing plenary session of the Clinton Global Initiative 2015 Annual Meeting at the Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel, on Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2015 in New York. (Photo by Greg Allen/Invision/AP)
Former President Bill Clinton wows the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting by demonstrating the size of the breasts of his latest mistress as he makes a pitch to give her company money. (Photo by Greg Allen/Invision/AP;caption by streiff)
Advertisement

Well, slap my ass and call me Sally. I am totally surprised that the Clinton Foundation would have used charitable contributions to prop up the for profit business of a close Bill Clinton “friend.” From the Wall Street Journal:

The Clinton Global Initiative, which arranges donations to help solve the world’s problems, set up a financial commitment that benefited a for-profit company part-owned by people with ties to the Clintons, including a current and a former Democratic official and a close friend of former President Bill Clinton.

The $2 million commitment was placed on the agenda for a September 2010 conference of the Clinton Global Initiative at Mr. Clinton’s urging, according to a document from the period and people familiar with the matter.

Mr. Clinton also personally endorsed the company, Energy Pioneer Solutions Inc., to then-Energy Secretary Steven Chu for a federal grant that year, said people with knowledge of the endorsement.

The Clinton Global Initiative’s help for a for-profit company part-owned by Clinton friends poses a different issue. Under federal law, tax-exempt charitable organizations aren’t supposed to act in anyone’s private interest but instead in the public interest, on broad issues such as education or poverty.

“The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests,” the Internal Revenue Service says on its website.

Energy Pioneer Solutions was founded in 2009 by Scott Kleeb, a Democrat who twice ran for Congress from Nebraska. An internal document from that year showed it as owned 29% by Mr. Kleeb; 29% by Jane Eckert, the owner of an art gallery in Pine Plains, N.Y.; and 29% by Julie Tauber McMahon of Chappaqua, N.Y., a close friend of Mr. Clinton, who also lives in Chappaqua.

Advertisement

Wait. There is a familiar name there. Julie Tauber McMahon. Leave it to the New York Post to hit the lede the WSJ buried:

Bill Clinton’s foundation arranged a $2 million pledge to a power company partly owned by a wealthy blond divorcée — who some say is the frequent visitor to his home nicknamed “Energizer.”

Hmmm. Why would a wealthy blond woman who is a frequent visitor to the Clinton’s double-wide in Chappaqua be code-named “Energizer” by the Secret Service?

McMahon, 54, is rumored to be the woman dubbed “Energizer” by the Secret Service at the Clinton home because of her frequent visits, according to RadarOnline.

Secret Service agents were even given special instructions to abandon usual protocol when the woman came by, according to journalist Ronald Kessler’s tell-all book, “The First Family Detail.”

“You don’t stop her, you don’t approach her, you just let her go in,” says the book, based on agents’ accounts.

“Energizer” is described in the book as a charming visitor who sometimes brought cookies to the agents.

The book describes one sun-drenched afternoon when agents took notice of the woman’s revealing attire.

“It was a warm day, and she was wearing a low-cut tank top, and as she leaned over, her breasts were very exposed,” an agent is quoted in the book.

“They appeared to be very perky and very new and full…There was no doubt in my mind they were enhanced.”

“Energizer” reportedly timed her arrivals and departures around Hillary Clinton’s schedule.

Advertisement

In a more sane day and age, the fact that Hillary Clinton was casting about national secrets like confetti and her husband was using a non-profit to essentially pay for sex would have disqualified them for anything other than a reservation at a federal penitentiary. But then, again, an orange faced ignoramus wouldn’t have been the alternative.

Like it or not, we are getting perilously close to “vote for the crook, it’s important” country.

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos