Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt isn’t pulling his (legal) punches these days. As we’ve reported previously, Schmitt has been availing his office of the courts in order to combat COVID-related governmental overreach.

In July, Schmitt filed suit in St. Louis County seeking to enjoin the implementation of a mask mandate via an Executive Order issued by County Executive Sam Page. (Sidebar: Someday, when time permits, I’m going to have to delve into the many machinations of Page and the ongoing intrigue between him and the County Council.) Last week, the Judge in that action issued an Order barring enforcement of the mandate.

That suit also sought to enjoin enforcement of a similar mandate issued by Mayor Tishaura Jones in the City of St. Louis. The portion of the suit pertaining to the City has now been severed and transferred to the City of St. Louis for further adjudication.

Schmitt has also filed suit in Jackson County, Missouri, seeking similar relief as to the mandate in effect there.

Schmitt announced, on Tuesday, that he’d filed a class action lawsuit against Missouri school districts mandating masks on students and teachers.

🚨Breaking: Today I filed a class action lawsuit against school districts in Missouri forcing masks on schoolchildren.

Families should be making these important decisions not government bureaucrats.

This is America. We have to fight back. #NoMaskMandates pic.twitter.com/7SNXYTgwjH

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) August 24, 2021

From the official statement released by his office:

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt today filed a class action lawsuit against school districts forcing a mask mandate on schoolchildren and teachers. The lawsuit, which is a reverse class action that was filed earlier this morning, names Columbia Public Schools, the Board of Education for the School District of Columbia and their board members, and the Superintendent for Columbia Public Schools as defendants.

“Forcing schoolchildren to mask all day in school flies in the face of science, especially given children’s low risk of severe illness and death and their low risk of transmission. Additionally, forcing schoolchildren to mask all day could hinder critical development by eliminating facial cues and expressions,” said Attorney General Schmitt. “We filed this suit today because we fundamentally don’t believe in forced masking, rather that parents and families should have the power to make decisions on masks, based on science and facts. I am committed to fighting back against this kind of government overreach. Americans are free people, not subjects.”

The lawsuit, which incorporates three counts argues that the imposition of a mask mandate on schoolchildren is arbitrary and capricious, that the mask mandate is subject to § 67.265, and that the mask mandate is unlawful as to schoolchildren.

The Petition can be read in full below. The statement released by Schmitt’s office summarizes their contentions thusly:

The lawsuit, which incorporates three counts argues that the imposition of a mask mandate on schoolchildren is arbitrary and capricious, that the mask mandate is subject to § 67.265, and that the mask mandate is unlawful as to schoolchildren.

To support the claims that the mask mandate is arbitrary and capricious, the lawsuit argues that children are at an extremely low risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19, that children are at a low risk for spreading COVID-19, that masks fail to provide adequate protection against COVID-19 in children, and that masks are detrimental to the development of young children.

Citing Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services data, the lawsuit notes that zero children under the age of 10 have died from COVID-19. Further, the lawsuit notes that children make up less than 1 out of every 100,000 people who are hospitalized in Missouri. Citing a study from the United Kingdom, the lawsuit states, “Data from the United Kingdom regarding fatality rates from the delta variant show the case fatality rate from delta is lower than other variants, and it is near 0.0% for those under fifty years old.”

Citing numerous medical studies, the lawsuit also makes the point that children have a low risk of transmitting the virus to other children. A Netherlands study cited by the lawsuit confirms that, “(1) children play a minor role in the spread of the novel coronavirus, (2) the virus is mainly spread between adults and from adult family members to children, and (3) the spread of COVID-19 among children or from children to adults is less common.” The lawsuit, citing another study from the United Kingdom, states, “the author confirmed that there is very little evidence that the virus is transmitted in schools.”

Specifically relating to the efficacy of masks themselves, the lawsuit argues, “Mask use by the general population shows, at best, a marginal impact on the spread of COVID-19. And most studies show no distinguishable difference between places with mask mandates and those without them.” The lawsuit continues, “Though the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control advocates for universal public mask use, it has conceded that the evidence of the benefit in wearing a surgical mask was ‘of low to moderate certainty’ and failed to show statistically significant benefits.” Moreover, the lawsuit says, “One study found that ‘[r]ates of infection were consistently higher among those in the cloth mask group than in the medical mask and control groups. … The poor performance may have been because the masks were not washed frequently enough or because they became moist and contaminated.’”

Lastly, the lawsuit argues that masks are a hindrance to development, especially in young children and those with special needs. A study cited by the lawsuit, which surveyed 25,930 schoolchildren, noted that 68% “complained about impairments caused by wearing the masks.” The lawsuit, citing the World Health Organization, states, “The World Health Organization notes that masking young children raises social and communication concerns.  Specifically, researchers are concerned that masks may ‘hinder verbal and non-verbal communication.’”

Following the announcement, Schmitt shared his own thoughts on the matter on Twitter:

If you’ve been vaccinated and want to put on 6 masks outside by yourself or want your kids to wear a mask all day long — go for it — this is America, but stop using government to force other people to wear masks. #NoMaskMandates

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) August 24, 2021

It didn’t take long for the Biden Administration to take note of the filing. Press Secretary Jen Psaki let their displeasure with the suit be known during yesterday’s press conference. To which, Attorney General Schmitt had this to say:

I won't let Washington dictate what we do in Missouri.

I’m fighting against forced masking of kids and allowing families to make those decisions not government bureaucrats.

BTW, Next time @ me @PressSec & @JoeBiden. #NoMaskMandates pic.twitter.com/V47QeHTWWi

— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) August 24, 2021

State v. Columbia Public Schools by Susie Moore on Scribd