As we reported, it has been a great day for the Trump administration so far, with the Supreme Court ruling 6-3 (with the liberal justices dissenting, surprise surprise) in the birthright citizenship case concerning nationwide injunctions that "Government’s applications for partial stays of the preliminary injunctions are granted, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue."
The liberal media, of course, is already fretting:
BREAKING: The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote, just handed Trump a major win by limiting judges’ ability to block his birthright citizenship order nationwide.
— POLITICO (@politico) June 27, 2025
Read more: https://t.co/Mnfv4yqNAA pic.twitter.com/9PE2MrFVNF
READ MORE -->> Big: Supreme Court Rules on Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Cases
The court's opinion was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who took the time to include a pretty stinging rebuke to the opinions of her colleague, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The comments have lit up Twitter/X, where many are cheering ACB for slapping down KBJ's flimsy arguments in a way that only she can:
"Justice Jackson ... chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever."
— Major Scobie (@GrahamGreeneEsq) June 27, 2025
Barrett is tired of pretending KBJ knows what she’s talking about. https://t.co/NwrpLKwyEM pic.twitter.com/L1iXGdTA6X
Amazing. Justice Barrett goes straight after Justice Jackson’s inability to do law. Jackson wants to tell the entire executive branch what to do and refuses to comply with Constitutional limitations. Insanely dangerous, and Barrett is right to call it out. pic.twitter.com/lRmkQvEgYZ
— May Mailman (@MayMailman) June 27, 2025
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary." https://t.co/5ZxmbCTZWz
— Robert (@TheCheekyTaurus) June 27, 2025
I don't think Justice Jackson is very good at her job. pic.twitter.com/VYiQBKyiEO
— Isaac Schorr (@isaac_schorr) June 27, 2025
"We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."…
— William A. Jacobson (@wajacobson) June 27, 2025
In her majority opinion for the Supreme Court nuking universal injunctions, Amy Coney Barrett also juked Kentanji Brown Jackson from orbit.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) June 27, 2025
“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the… pic.twitter.com/je6FsoXxCi
Justice Jackson nationwide injunctions dissent is going to be the most wrong SCOTUS opinion of the term.
— I work with my word (@iworkwithmyword) June 27, 2025
What's funny, is that her frame: a district judge issuing an order to the President with the words "follow the law" is so obviously not what courts do! pic.twitter.com/x6iDTvpgvq
KBJ realizes that part of her job is not to actively alienate and insult her colleagues, right? pic.twitter.com/cG4EzwFp07
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) June 27, 2025
This is a HUGE victory.
— M.A. Rothman (@MichaelARothman) June 27, 2025
Also Justice Barrett slapped the snot out of Justice Jackson who arguably is looking for Judicial Supremacy....
"When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is 𝐧𝐨𝐭 for the court to exceed its power, too." –JUSTICE… pic.twitter.com/Q5ejSUktes
The SCOTUS majority has no time for Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson's nonsense.
— Maxwell Meyer (@mualphaxi) June 27, 2025
Justice Barrett absolutely rips her apart on the nationwide injunctions case for her incoherent dissent. Barrett tries to nicely explain that Judges aren't dictators.
It's... beautiful 🥲 pic.twitter.com/tbvOAlJgtj
Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion on the nationwide injunctions case: pic.twitter.com/QTD8wTd2Bb
— BananaRepublican (@BananaRep405) June 27, 2025
More of Barrett nuking Jackson from orbit: pic.twitter.com/joKaIdtr0v
— Conn Carroll (@conncarroll) June 27, 2025
And perhaps my favorite reaction of all:
"We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary." -ACB in the universal injunctions opinion, clearly fed up with KBJ’s theater kid drama pic.twitter.com/7m3O6BWXw4
— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) June 27, 2025
... and we are so here for it!
FLASHBACK -->> READ: Clarence Thomas' Straight-Fire Response to Ketanji Brown Jackson in Affirmative Action Case Concurrence
Editor's Note: Partisan federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people
Please help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member