Ach, the tangled skeins of modern journalism/politics/NGOs. Let me walk you through the timeline.

What’s the Colorado Health Foundation? Take it away, Colorado Peak Politics:

According to Colorado Consumer Health Initiative’s project website, it’s one of the backers to help implement the Colorado Exchange.

[snip]

Colorado Health Foundation has an interest in seeing the Colorado Exchange and Obamacare succeed and thrive because the organization helped fund its implementation. In fairness to Booth, he hasn’t started the job yet (to our knowledge) and perhaps he isn’t aware of the obvious conflict of interest, but we think it would have been most appropriate for him to disclose his new role in conjunction with the article that he wrote since he’s covering the beat.

Funny how that happens so often in policy reporting, isn’t it? And yes, it’s certainly relevant if an author of an article on a particular topic is going to go work for an organization that has a vested interest in that topic. It’s especially relevant when people already have what is apparently well-founded suspicion that most media entities seem to think that the First Amendment has Always give cover to Democrats written in invisible ink.

If you click on the Colorado Peak Politics site, you’ll see that Booth put out a tweet that ended with the pious entreaty “Support journalism.” To which I say: you first, sir.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: The Denver Post is sufficiently worried about this development as to be pushing back on it here and here. I will leave it to the reader to decide how well ‘Trust us’ works as a rebuttal…