I have an alternative idea for the way we choose our presidential candidate. Instead of them campaigning in states like Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and even places like Nevada, Georgia, and Texas, and then relying on a few hundred phone calls or texts from polling companies to determine who the people prefer, maybe we should try something a little different.

How about having the candidates campaign in person in all the same locations? I know, but stay with me...And then, on a specific date in 2024, the voters in those states actually go to the polling places and physically cast their vote for their preferred candidate. You know, like an election. People would go in, get a ballot, and mark the box next to the candidate's name that they support.

Or, for Iowa, why not have big rooms throughout the state where voters can come together and spend a few hours debating? They can discuss why they think one candidate is better than the others. It could be like a caucus, where real voters engage in meaningful conversations about the candidates. And at the end, after this comprehensive process, certain candidates would emerge based on the level of support they received. First, second, third place, and so on.

Look, I'm no political scientist, but I think this would be a better way to choose the leader of the free world. Instead of relying on people who may or may not respond truthfully to some random survey or phone call, let's have voters actually "vote" for the candidates. I know it sounds crazy, but hear me out.

We can't be certain if the people who respond to pollsters are being honest. And let's be real, relying on a 30-second clip on Fox News or a 15-second glimpse on Newsmax isn't really an effective way to make informed decisions.

So, why not let the actual voters decide? Let them gather in person and have meaningful discussions about the candidates. Let them take the time to really understand what each candidate stands for. Let them cast their votes in a secure and proper manner.

I'm just brainstorming here, but I genuinely believe that this could be a better way to ensure that we choose the best candidate to lead our country. I welcome your thoughts and opinions on this matter because, at the end of the day, we all want what's best for our nation. Let's make our voices heard through a fair and transparent process.

But hey, who needs actual democracy when we can have the illusion of it? Let's continue relying on pollsters who claim to speak for the "silent majority" while dismissing the voices of the actual majority. Who needs to physically vote when we can just rely on small sample sizes and biased media coverage? After all, it's much more convenient to be told who we should vote for by pundits and politicians rather than engage in meaningful discussions and make our own informed decisions.

So, let's keep playing this game of political theater, where the real winners are the campaign strategists and the media outlets cashing in on our misplaced trust. Who needs a fair and transparent process when we can just embrace the chaos and uncertainty? Cheers to another round of superficial democracy!