Shannon Bream Just Bodies Tim Walz on Border, Abortion and 'Misspeaking' During Fox Interview

AP Photo/Matt Rourke

You know that the Democrats have to be worried because they're finally having Kamala Harris and Tim Walz do more interviews, although they are still largely with friendly outlets. 

Advertisement

The only one that wasn't easy was an interview that Walz did on "Fox News Sunday" with Shannon Bream, who actually asked him some real questions. I suppose they wanted to be able to say they "did" Fox, but they didn't want to send Kamala so the only other choice was Walz. Naturally, he didn't really answer any of the questions and just lied his head off. But in this case, unlike probably some of the other interviews, Shannon Bream came back at him on some of the issues. 

If buying groceries is a concern for you, don't worry. Tim Walz says Kamala has a "middle-class agenda." 

Translation? It will be exactly the same and we still won't give you any real answers. So if you want four more years of this, that's what you'll get if you vote for Biden-Harris. 

Then when they spoke about tariffs, Walz lied and said former President Donald Trump wanted a 20 percent sales tax. But then Bream laid into him saying if you're talking about tariffs, you kept the Trump tariffs and even added some of your own. 

Advertisement

So you can't have it both ways, and have tariffs be bad only when they're Trump's. 

Bream also nailed him on a couple of points when it came to abortion, showing how what he was saying made no sense and/or he was lying. 

Bream asked him about the Minnesota law that he signed that had no restrictions through nine months. He claimed he and Harris only wanted Roe v. Wade restored. But Bream just bodies him over how what he signed went far beyond Roe v. Wade and how he's lying about Trump's position on abortion. 

Bream also decimated him over what he said about Amber Thurman, noting she died because of the effects from the abortion pill and not getting appropriate care soon enough. 

Bream asked him, why did he have language taken out of law for preserving life if the baby was born alive? 

He claimed it changed nothing, it just aligned with all the care that doctors are supposed to provide. 

Advertisement

So why did you remove it then? He couldn't answer that. 

Bream also asked him about his offensive comment that "anti-Israel protesters" were speaking out for "all the right reasons." 

His response? Oh, I didn't mean the "pro-Hamas" ones. So why did you say it that way without any distinctions? Bottom line, you were trying to appeal to the radical left, and now you've been nailed on it. 

Then she got to the question I think everyone wonders about Walz, which is basically, why has he said so much that isn't true? She went through the litany from stolen valor to IVF and his lies about his trip to China. He characterized it as "misspeaking." 

He said he didn't think people cared, but then he lamely tried to lie about Trump's position about IVF in the process. He tried to avoid lying about his military rank and record by saying he wouldn't disparage someone else's record. But he did just that when he lied about his own record. You can't cover up having a problem of lying by claiming you speak "passionately," especially if you lie, even now, as he was being nailed about lying. 

Advertisement

"I will own up when I misspeak," he said. But he didn't, as he lied even more. 

Then Bream really blew him up over the border when he tried to claim that Harris' policies were the "most strongest, fairest we've seen." Bream shot that down, saying most people see it as an "open border." 

Then he tried to fall back on the bad bill that they claimed they needed to do something when Trump did better than them without such a bill. Of course, they failed because they did away with the protections he had employed when they came in on day one. Illegal entry was much higher under Biden-Harris, and Trump built 450 miles of war even as Democrats were doing everything they could to try to stop him. 

Bream pointed out how the legislation they're claiming they support includes the wall that they disparaged. She also pointed out how that bill he was talking about was only negotiated by a few Republicans, and many came out against it. It also was shot down because it basically legitimized letting in thousands a day into the country. 

Then she completely finished him off, showing how radical he has been in Minnesota with his law providing free stuff for illegal aliens, including licenses, free college, and free health care for illegal aliens. Why should taxpayers pay for that, Bream asked, saying aren't those magnets for illegal aliens? 

Advertisement

Walz denied these were Harris' positions, but it was clear he thought they were just great. This was just a crazy response. 

Plus, Harris has said that she was for free health care for illegal aliens and for decriminalizing illegal immigrants, so this was a great question from Bream exposing how far left they both are. He even lied about this: 

Recommended

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Trending on RedState Videos