Very Frail "Should Probably NOT Be Vaccinated,” Says Top Norwegian Doc After 13 Elderly Deaths Linked to Pfizer's Experimental Concoction

Dirk Waem, Pool via AP

Did you know that 1300 people—including 800 kids—had their lives irreparably destroyed after a shot of the rushed-to-market Swine Flu vaccine left them with incurable narcolepsy?

Probably not, I suppose, since our media has gone into full-time shilling for the vastly more rushed-to-market product Pfizer’s now peddling as a COVID-19 prophylactic.

Say what you will about that disastrous Swine Flu vax, however. Unlike the mRNA technology that Pfizer’s currently pushing on a mostly unsuspecting world, at least it really meets the definition of a vaccine.

The CDC defines a vaccine as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” And, whether or not those same exact words are used, so does every other authority you’d care to consult.

But that’s NOT what the stuff Pfizer wants to make a fortune injecting into your veins does. It doesn’t stimulate your system to produce immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

It doesn’t stimulate your system at all.

What Pfizer’s concoction does is insert a piece of the virus’s RNA into some of your cells to genetically alter them into human-virus hybrids (not kidding or exaggerating) so they start excreting proteins from the virus’s outer shell.

And it’s those SARS-CoV-2 proteins oozing out of your brand-spanking-new, genetically-altered, human-virus, tissue that are—IN THEORY—supposed to provoke your body into an immune response.

The mRNA tech used in both Pfizer and Moderna‘s products is NOT itself a vaccine, as the term has always been defined. Instead, the tech is supposed to genetically engineer some of your body’s cells with SARS-CoV-2 RNA to make them start excreting something that would ordinarily be defined as a vaccine.

Moreover, would you believe that, up until a few months ago, mRNA tech had never so much as been tested on human beings?

Oh, and almost forgot. Don’t even think about suing should anything go wrong. Pfizer and the other pharmaceutical companies had to be granted immunity from legal liability before they were even willing to enter the race to get rich selling a COVID-19 prophylactic.

The fact that government officials are calling this stuff a vaccine and not being upfront about how radically different it is from what we’ve become familiar with under that name is, of course, obscene.

It doesn’t just turn your cells into human-virus hybrids.

For no extra charge, it turns you into a human guinea pig as well.

But the way the media isn’t reporting the bad news already accumulating about the deadly effects of Pfizer’s mad-scientist brew is even more despicable.

For example, you probably didn’t hear that 23 frail and elderly Norwegians died after letting someone inject Pfizer’s mRNA tech into their veins.

And, if you did hear about it, it’s probably from some media source like yesterday’s New York Post, which reported on those 23 dead Norwegians but went out of its way to claim there’s nothing to see here nor any reason not to roll up your sleeve and get in line.

But what the Post’s story didn’t mention is that 13 of those deaths have been definitively linked to Pfizer’s experimental mRNA concoction.

Nor did their readers learn that, in light of its having killed those 13 elderly Norwegians, one of Norway’s top medical officials has explicitly advised that frail and elderly people probably ought to abstain.

We’ve known from the beginning that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in conjunction with zinc and another drug is remarkably effective at preventing COVID-19’s alleged symptoms from becoming fatal if administered within seven days after they start.

Anthony Fauci has duplicitously cited studies that either didn’t use the full cocktail of drugs or administered them more than seven days after the onset of symptoms to convince the public that HCQ doesn’t work.

Not surprising, since the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process used in the standard tests for COVID-19, Kary Mullis, warned us all before he died in August of 2019 that, in addition to being a fraud who “doesn’t know anything” about science or medicine, Fauci is also an unprincipled scoundrel “who does not mind going on television, in front of the people who pay his salary, and lying directly into the camera.”

Esteemed Yale epidemiologist Harvey Risch has also gone on record explicitly accusing Fauci of suppressing HCQ because he’s “in bed” with special interests who profit and thereby, knowingly causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Needless to say, the fact that government officials are pushing Pfizer’s mad-scientist brew on unsuspecting elderly people and their loved ones while dishonestly suppressing a cure that’s not only been shown to be effective but has also been used safely in other contexts for over half a century is not a good sign.

As I reported back in August, at least ten officials responsible for setting NIH COVID treatment guidelines have financial ties to pharmaceutical firms peddling COVID cures Fauci has aggressively touted.

Unfortunately, I can’t tell you whether anyone is lining Anthony Fauci’s own pockets since he doesn’t appear to be subject to the same stringent disclosure requirements that forced his 10 colleagues to reveal their own vested interests.

But I can tell you that eight of those ten are being enriched by Gilead Sciences, makers of the drug remdesivir, which Fauci touted in terms that could have come straight out of one of Gilead’s ads:

The data shows that remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery.

Since then, a study has shown that not only is remdesivir ineffective against COVID-19. Two-thirds of the patients wound up having adverse side effects.

Moreover, as Steven Hatfill noted in a damning exposé of Fauci’s murderous perfidy—unlike the HCQ cocktail, which can be taken by anyone at home—remdesivir is “an experimental drug that has to be given intravenously every day for five days” and, hence, was “never suitable for major widespread outpatient or at-home use.”

If Hatfill’s name rings a bell, that’s probably because he’s the U.S. Army bioweapons expert who won a $5.8 million settlement after Robert Mueller’s FBI spent seven years publicly trying to pin the 2001 Anthrax attacks on him. The real culprit committed suicide when they finally cottoned on to him and stopped making Hatfill’s life a living hell

Anyway, it’s going to be hard for a lot of decent Americans for whom evil of this magnitude would be unthinkable to accept. But, the fact is that our nation’s top health officials are suppressing known safe and effective cures while trying to turn us all into guinea pigs by touting experimental concoctions whose safety and effectiveness is very much up in the air.

You do what you want, obviously. But I wouldn’t let any elderly person I cared about be subjected to Pfizer’s experiment in genetic manipulation risibly being palmed off as just a regular old run-of-the-mill vaccine under any circumstances.

Heck, given that everyone involved knows full well that—should disaster ensue—the media will be happy to blame it all on the dreaded Orange Man rushing the manufacturers to get it done before the election and even make up any necessary quotes from “anonymous sources familiar with the matter” along the way…well, you draw your own conclusions. But it wouldn’t surprise me all that much if it turned out such stories were already written and filed away for future use before the first jab.

Regardless, just like the head of the Norwegian Medicines Agency, Steinar Madsen, those 13 elderly Norwegians whose deaths have been definitively linked to Pfizer’s experimental mad-scientist brew are more than enough for me.

***

UPDATE (Jan 16, 2021, 5:25 pm ET):

Make that 29 dead Norwegians.

But, no reason for concern since that only amounts to a mere 10,000 times greater than the flu vaccine’s post-jab fatality rate.

I’m sure it’ll be fine.

***

UPDATE (Jan 17, 2021, 9 am ET):

Seems a highly esteemed PRO-VACCINE microbiologist suspects that there’s a serious risk of an adverse reaction in people who get the Pfizer jab who’ve already been infected and that, moreover, this may also portend ill for people who haven’t been infected when they get their second jab.

This is obviously a developing story and I’ll continue to update as more dead bodies or data turn up.