WATCH: Undercover Project Veritas Video Shows Pfizer Scientists Countering Government Narrative

Pfizer scientist discussing effectiveness of natural immunity in undercover Project Veritas video.

Last night, Project Veritas dropped a video that pushes back in a big way against a mainline narrative surrounding the vaccines. The exchanges happened between undercover journalists and multiple Pfizer scientists who were involved in the development, all of it caught on tape.

The issue covered in the video is not whether the vaccines themselves work to stop serious illness, but whether natural immunity (already having and recovering from COVID-19) should be acknowledged as an effective alternative. That has become a hot-button issue because the federal government has repeatedly obfuscated in regards to natural immunity, not admitting that studies show it’s stronger than just being vaccinated. They’ve also pushed no exceptions for the naturally immune in regards to mandates and guidelines for the unvaccinated, whether crafted at the federal level or supported at the state level.

Now, this video offers further evidence of what many have suspected regarding the existence of natural immunity and why there is a total refusal to just follow the science in regards to it.

The first scientist is a biochemist named Nick Karl who claims that antibodies from natural immunity are not only likely stronger than those garnered from the vaccine but are more encompassing against variants of the virus. That could explain why, at least anecdotally, it seems as if the naturally immune are not catching the Delta variant at as high a rate as the vaccinated and unvaccinated who have never had COVID-19.

Your antibodies are probably better than the vaccination. When somebody is naturally immune, like, they got COVID, they probably have better, like, not better, but more antibodies against the virus.

So when you actually get the virus, you’re going to start producing antibodies against multiple pieces of the virus so your antibodies are probably better at that point than the vaccination.

Chris Croce, a senior associate scientist with Pfizer agreed when pressed on the matter, saying that natural immunity offers “probably more” protection than just being vaccinated, including the longer existence of immunity.

The last scientist, Rahul Khandke, concurs and notes that they are indoctrinated into only touting the vaccine even though they know natural immunity exists. He cites seminars and other measures put in place to keep Pfizer employees on message. He also concedes that those with natural immunity should be able to prove they have it in order to stop being classified as simply “unvaccinated.”

We’re bred and taught to be like, “vaccine is safer than actually getting COVID.” Honestly, we had to do so many seminars on this, you have no idea. Like, we have to sit there for hours and hours and listen to like, be like, “you cannot talk about this in public.”

Two of the scientists specifically cite money as a motivating factor for the refusal by Pfizer and others to acknowledge natural immunity as strong and long-lasting. One claims that the entire company now runs off COVID money. That’s hardly ground-breaking, but it does speak to the idea that admitting natural immunity works could cost these companies billions of dollars.

Lastly, Chris Croce is shown again explaining that Pfizer has concerns about myocarditis in younger people who have been vaccinated. He says they are testing 3000 samples to see if there is a connection. When asked to follow up, he said the results were not back yet but that “hopefully” they are good. Croce also cited a work environment where people are always “listening” and there’s a concern with saying anything negative about “big pharma.”

The video itself is not “anti-vaccine,” though it will likely be spun that way by detractors. Rather, it’s a look at how obfuscation in messaging helps push government policies, specifically regarding mandates, that run counter to the scientific data. Natural immunity is proven to exist and be highly effective. Yet, the vaccine companies won’t admit it, likely because of money, while the federal government won’t admit it, likely because of a desire for power. That’s not how a pandemic should be handled. People value honesty and they loathe being manipulated for the “greater good.”

There would be far less “vaccine hesitancy” in my view if these companies and governments gave a full-throated acknowledgment that natural immunity exists and is a public policy alternative for those that have recovered from COVID-19. That would coalesce people in protecting those who truly need protection. That’s not going to happen, though, because there’s too much incentive to keep pushing the “only vaccine” narrative.